Guys,
I have been watching PR for days now though I have not done a rambling or a samachar patra but the entire time I was watching the show I noted certain instances that I thought were very ironic and I wanted to make a quick post to share.
Varsha – woman who had just rejected her own offspring was torn up at the fact that her mother had rejected her as a daughter because of her recent behaviour? If you think about it her mother had cut the invisible "umbilical cord" not entirely as a sign of rejection but more so to give her the independence she craved yet the logic of her mother's behaviour was seen as personal betrayal by a self-sustaining woman who had just severed the umbilical cord of her own and very dependent baby.
Girish - a man who accepted Manav's mahaanta to fix the situation of his compromised daughter found his mahaanta in helping a distraught Varsha frustrating and detrimental to his own daughter's wellbeing? Odd isn't it that we choose to accept someone's generosity selfishly for our own purpose but are not equally understanding when the same generosity is used to help others? His daughter falling in love with a man who had only promised her a compromised marriage is his daughter's own cross to bear, in my opinion. I don't condone his secretive liaison with Archu as that is being insensitive to Shravani though I think for anyone to expect him to fall in love with a woman he has decided to marry as a compromise is surreal. He knows Varsha because of Archu but somehow I think that he helped Varsha because he treats her as his muhboli sister rather than his ex-sis-in-law and I see no devious or conniving intentions there.
Not sure if you feel the same but do drop in your comments.
Hope