Aa..haa.. So Mannubaba is actually sharing!😈 Nothing wrong guys, unless innuendoes are intended. But then even on then count why such a fury?😲 Come on guys, he is entitled to some company considering an otherworldly self restraint so far. Lol.😆😆
But fair minded fair ones, be not perturbed.😉 As far as 'propriety' is the demand of the hour (nightly), our Yogibaba is known to have resisted even the loveliest or the sweetest, so what power an 'acid' can have on him?👏 Oh yes suddenly found camaraderie or domestic bonhomie with the 'shrew' is…uh…oh..lol…Kools , friend please don't frown, I know your stand on the matters of unjustified name calling but please listen to my side. O.k. serious…
Shravni is a character; you are right on most counts while defending her 'upfront' actions. She may be well within her right to feel entitled (though slight different opinion on the way that 'entitlement' has come about) and rightly offended when spurned or 'unrequited', more so when prevented from 'quitting' twice (or thrice?!) with further assurances. Her over all 'persona' is not villainous neither unreasonable and as a 'human being' she can not be morally wished away just like that. But Kools precisely here is the problem. This 'CHARACTER' is continuously being portrayed in –righteous, victimized, more realistic and absolutely- difficult- to- wish- away MODE. And in all these she beats the leads hands down, but how? -In my opinion- deliberately and artificially (For I see her only as the product of a plot induced character and not real person- which is what 'she' is). They can as well pen her negative but no, she is always kept 'propped' up- just on the border- but propped up, she always is. A rational mind may as well end up defending it and they are successful in their 'goal'. What goal? I vaguely perceive, though better analyst s should dissect it more correctly. My contention is this-(out of idleness- quoting directly from a previous post on the same matter…)… "I think, this help them perpetuation, a skill they have mastered. Previously they were coming up with the clear black gourds, the villains of only one shade. But that would exhaust them of the 'obstacle' options- for they have to show resolutions sooner then later. Else they would be quickly identified with the evil for showing continuous victories of evil and viewers would drop them fast. In this new kind of' victim villains', the leads themselves help them 'create' obstacles and thereby help them suspend the resolutions.
But this scheme is leading to a serious compromise of the leads. We can't stay sympathized to them for a long time and stop liking them. (Actually this too must be suitable to the producers. This will keep the lead actors in check and no one would grow too much out of their shoes, or out under from Her shoes!)."
But this leads to a deep dissatisfaction on the viewers (most of them) part. The leads could as well have been assigned more realistic portrayals or more relatable persona or sounder rebuttals to her debates but no every thing on their part is kept on hold till as long as possible and that's where the fatigue sets in. Better heed to their own arrogantly cynical advice- "Don't watch if you don't like."
p.s. just my POV- no offence or 'lecturing' intended.
CID
Music Corner
