Manav's decision and character - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

12

Views

2.2k

Users

7

Likes

34

Frequent Posters

Rumii thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#11
GAURIMISHA- had no right to give his word to Shravani without Archana's consent in the first place.This is marriage n it cant b broken just by his sayin tht I dont want to hav any relation with Archana.Who gave him tht right to promise to shravani?
Archu herself gave Manav that Right because She herself had done that when She didn't even Care to listen to what Manav had to say n She accused Manav of Cheating her,insulted him unthinkably in Public ans eventually left him...Did She Ever ask Manav what did he have tosay? Did she take his consent while 'breaking;' their relationship???????????
So Manav has every right to decide about leaving Archana for good n Move on!!
After all It's NOT ONLY HUSBAND's Duty to beleive in his wife...it is Vice-Versa....that's one of the Vows of Hindu marriage So what's left for the Other person to follow that if one of them breaks that Vow..??
anjalisharma200 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#12
I am very glad that many of you expressed your opinions here,it made me see other point of views.

I agree with several opinions here that Manav did not need to consult Archana when he made that promise to Shravani. But Manav and Archana both signed the divorce papers regardless of under what circumstances because they know what it meant.

I also think that Archana's primary reason to come to back Manav was selfish- she wanted forgiveness and Manav to accept her. If she really loved Manav she should see that she has caused so much pain to him and his family. I know that Manav's family is no less and that they have caused pain to Archana. I think that Manav was more wronged by Archana than other way around.

Mostly, what i don't understand is that Why Archana inserts herself in Manav's life? she knows that Manav has made promise to Sharavani. Manav has told her that it is better for both of them to move on, then why does she play holi with him? why couldn't she say that i will not sit with Manav is puja? She claims that as a wife she will support Manav's decision-- is this how she plans to do that? if she loves him so much doesn't she see how hard this is for Manav and shouldn't she make it easier for him?
Edited by anjalisharma200 - 15 years ago
gaurimisha thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 15 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: iamindian

GAURIMISHA- had no right to give his word to Shravani without Archana's consent in the first place.This is marriage n it cant b broken just by his sayin tht I dont want to hav any relation with Archana.Who gave him tht right to promise to shravani?

Archu herself gave Manav that Right because She herself had done that when She didn't even Care to listen to what Manav had to say n She accused Manav of Cheating her,insulted him unthinkably in Public ans eventually left him...Did She Ever ask Manav what did he have tosay? Did she take his consent while 'breaking;' their relationship???????????
So Manav has every right to decide about leaving Archana for good n Move on!!
After all It's NOT ONLY HUSBAND's Duty to beleive in his wife...it is Vice-Versa....that's one of the Vows of Hindu marriage So what's left for the Other person to follow that if one of them breaks that Vow..??

If u remember Archana atleast went ahead to hav a talk with Manav before signing divorce papers,Manav hardly tried.
Both husband n wife should trust each other but trust is something tht builds up with time..not just bcoz they r in a relationship.Both didnt trust each other when needed,they were right not to trust.But wht I disagree with is if a husband doesnt trust his wife or they hav some misunderstanding between them,does that give him the right to promise marriage to another woman?I find it grossly unfair.
Archu never went ahead and promised marriage to Satish neither did she break their relationship,the only mistake she did was to not trust Manav.And yes she did listen to him(Oct 2nd epi India) and also said to her family tht somehow she's nt yet ready to believe Manav is guilty inspite of all those proofs.
Manav has right to decide and move on...but if u observe the recent episodes,he still loves her and hasnt moved on a bit...so wht gave him the right to ruin 3 lives by a promise?
Had Manav fell in love with shravani and decided to move on,I wud nt mind his doing so...but clearly this isnt the case.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".