Originally posted by: gaurimisha
she is only trying to focus on this relationship as Akash rightly said coz the baby needs a happy couple
When has tht been conveyed through any of the scenes?
Her dialogues do not convey it. Her character has not been given any dialogues by creatives , more of silent grief and a lot of contemplating . Still u guys say she doesnt grieve for sAchin . And I wont blame the creatives for not reiterating the baby point now as they r frankly concentrating on making Archu a Devi currently and giving her many emotiobal dialogues . But the premise of this whole compromise thing was the baby and PLENTY was said earlier ..........once the decision has taken place what shud we expect to see , shravani constantly stroking her tummy and saying Baby oh my baby ? Or moving aside quietly in another room to give Archu Manav privacy ? Even we in real life dont do that when we get pregnant .Hell , ladies travel to job and forget the baby inside the tummy and work like men till 6 in the evening , come home and start cooking..........what is this exact display of Baby love that you guys want ?😆😆
But telling Varsha , Manav Vaishu that I want this marraige to proceed [ Shravni and manavs] and then in private going boo hoo hoo on his shoulder is indeed a blunt mixed signal . Like I said the man seemed to have more control over his emotions than her .She cud have congratulated him quietly and then sobbed her heart out in private .
She only said it when Manav asked her to move on.Had Varshu n vaishali asked her to move on,her answer wud have been same.Along with tht ,its really difficult to always stick to wht is right than wht u want...here in the kitchen Archu had her vulnerale moment. One vulnerable moment ?😆😆 My dear , before the engagement she had already told him I cannot bear to see u getting engaged [ in private again] while asking for ;permission ' to go to maayka for the day . After the engagement , right after telling the chawl girls off , again this vulnerable moment .In the temple when he is putting sindoor [ after putting sindoor in Shravnis maang btw] she has one more "VULNERABLE" moment where she shuts her eyes in bLISS as if she has been rewarded . Lady get a grip and dont demean urself this way as u represent women ! Clearly the man , although currently coming across a bigamist , is having marvellous emotional control over himself ......what the hell r u doing ? Just like the old saying too many cooks spoil the broth , too many vulnerable moments make a woman look pathetic !😆
agreeing to savitas demand that shravni shud sit for pooja and then wearing her sari coz someone forced her and sitting for pooja without having any bloody personal stand on the matter is again a mixed signal . If I were in Shhravnis place I wud start eyeing archna with disbelief and raised eyebrows . This woman says toh nice nice things and seems also sincere , but her behaviour is ekdum ulta , is she the chuparustom type ? Would be my nagging doubt .
As I said earlier,what shravani feels for Archu doesnt anger me as a viewer.She's perfectly natural tht way.
Archana for taking such blatant shit and abuse and degrading women in general inspite of being a lead . I dont feel like giving the excuse to both of them saying that they r emotional fools , they r made that way etc etc as then what is happening is creatives r getting succesful in their ploy of making us get used to their chauvinistic portrayal .........we r swallowing it and now gradually even accepting it
Had they showcased Archu as Damini or some strong woman,I wud hav thot otherwise.Accepting Archu n Manav doesnt mean accepting chauvinistic portrayal,rather its accepting two human beings for wht they r than to expect the contradictory.Meek n submissive people, most of the times fail to stand up for themselves,does tht mean we shudnt accept them as such.Ah but there ur ! Damini was NOT a dominating , feminist , hard as nails woman at all ! She was a simple , meek housewife who worshipped her hubby , adored him just like Archu . Her inner true strength came out when she stood for a principle ..............AGainst abuse of a woman , against rape of a woman although it was from her own sasuraal , her own brother in law who did it . Archu is ready to put Ajit behind bars but allows Manju to go scot free coz she is pregnant , and allows Savita to go scot free although she is a vile abusive woman simply coz she is her husbands mother . And this is what I am constantly talking about that this is a kind of double standard ..............The inner strength of Damini is NOT THE STRENGTH OF A WOMAN IT IS THE STRENGTH INHERENT IN EVERY INDIVIDUAL TOLD IN THE GITA . Damini earns our respect coz she stands for a principle ........Archu seems to have no principle whatsoever .She seems to have only one policy ........'unconditional , egoless love for Manav " which can easily be construed as pathetic weakness due to a misplaced idea of love , resulting from a lovesick condition that has arisen due to being bottled up for 26 years .😆
The fact remains tht PR is a show where the leads r meek,submissive,emotional,uneducated and suffer from inferiority complex,in short u can call them as losers.And wht I meant by acceptance is ,to expect otherwise from the CRs wud b rather foolish.Ah , so my expectations r foolish then !😆Well I dont mind if anyone says that but they stay . To each his own . In my opinion dear , thinking what nonsense Archu is doing as something great and 'understanding' Manavs acts as pressurized due to circumstances is incomprehensible .