nishr
Thanks for saying that my posts make you re think about issues ......i appreciate it .
Good recap about the mothers but i wud request you to look at Sulochana if you can from the perspective of a girl's mother in a simple traditional society .
As nikita very rightly pointed out , a man does NOT leave his home and family to go and live with a girl ..........his adjustment , from day one in the so called marraige is not even one fourth of what the girl goes through .
Since it is the girl who leaves her blood family and goes to live in a totally strange house and accept totally strange people as her own , the responsibility of seeing that this stay is every bit comfortable for the girl comes on the girl's parents .......in this case , Sulochana and Manohar .
They first ensure that the girl does not lack food or clothing , the basics , just as she was accustomed to in their house , that same standard of living she continues with it as adjusting even in that will really make this adjustment tough . And hence the insistence on a boy with the same status . It is not greed or selfishness at all , it is being practical , ratonal and imminently sensible by falling back on your experience .
Now to Sulochana's credit ..........she actually adjusted on the financial factor and sent her daughter to live in a standard of living that was below them . Why ? Because she was told , the boy was good .
Sulochana never was pissed off about the poverty . Not once do we we see her calling the Deshmukhs bhikaari . Yes , Savita is ulta calling Archana bhikaari..........that speaks a lot for her level and mentality . We never see Sulochana criticizing the poverty of the Deshmukhs in Archu's absence .
What pissed her off were the lies that Savita told right in the beginning of the marraige .........if at all trust is expected in an arranged marraige , the foundation of that trust is laid in the talks between the two families where everything is disclosed .......like the guys income , his degrees , his character , his future goals . Savita broke this very foundation although Manav later tried to rectify it .
Inspite of that , sulochana came around and actually decided to give that marraige a chance . She sent her daughter there and not once did she influence her like Rasika does in a negative way . She never made enquiries about the standard of living , or other aspects .........she just let them be .
But in those 15 days she saw a very ugly side of the boy's mother .........greed for money , threats to harm her daughter if the money wasnt given and a total inactivity or unawareness on the boy's part of his mother's deeds . Still she went on giving that marraige a chance . But her worst fears had come true . The boy's mother was uncontrollable and both.........the son in law and her own daughter , who was unlike Varsha , were incapable of controlling her or stopping her .
Her patience snapped when photographhs of the boy with prostitutes were circulated in public , and the police vouched that the boy was biling pimps out . She had tolerated everything , for the sole reason that the ' boy was good ' . When even that fact was belied , she snapped and slapped Manav .
Today she is hated for that action . But Sulochana never insulted Manav or tried to insult Manav like Rasika subtly sets out to insult Vinod or control him . The slap was more a reaction of horror about her daughter's safety . Sukochana never made Manav sit down in front of her and shame him by telling him of hos mother's dowry demands . Had she done that , wud Manav have ever been able to hold his head up ?
She never even went to Manav's garage and tell him about the character assasination of Archu that Savita was doing by standing on road , or Satishs office , and neither did she use her influence with Satish to stop him from giving a loan to that terrible family or Manav .
That was because truly speaking Sulochana did not hate Manav as much as she feared Savita . And was she so wrong?
What wud Savita have done if pictures of Vandus husband with prostitutes wud have been shown to her ? She wud have caught her damaad's collar and sat on his chest demanding an explanation . What wud Rasika have done ? Vinod is so decent yet she attempts to demand explanations about Manju's happiness . So wud have Bhavna if she had a daughter . What does Girish do ? He is extremely demanding about Shravnis happiness .
So why this unreasonable hate about Sulochana by viewers ?
It is the mentality , nothing else . The mentality of viewers moulded by serials and films that tell us that a girl's mother has no right to be concerned about her happiness , or ask questions or demand explanations from her son in law about it. It is sacrilege ! Sulochna has comitted sacrilege by taking her daughter home , demanding explanations ........she shud have let her daughter continue staying there and NOT DEMANDED EXPLANATIONS .
Sulochana never even filed for divorce , SAvita did , and Sulochana never even taught her daughter to demand alimony .
Thats where she went wrong . Had she taught her daughter that , today this rut that Manav keeps repeating about Shravani being his responsibility ...........his eyes wud have opened as if an electric shock was given to him . He wud have realised that Archana , his legal wife was his social and legaL RESPONSIBILITY .........AND THAT ALL OTHER THINGS CAME LATER , THAT FIRST AND FOREMOST HE HAD TO SHOW THIS AWARENESS BY GIVING ARCHANA HALF OF HIS FINANCES , HOWEVER MEAGRE THEY MAY BE . RESPONSIBILITY BEGINS THERE .Ultimately my dear what Sulochana is truly guilty of is accurate foresightedness .........that just the boy being good is never enough , the boys mom matters too if the boy is not gonna live seperate . And by being foresighted , Sulochana committed sacrilege in the eyes of viewers .
W
Edited by koolsadhu1000 - 15 years ago