Originally posted by: sadvita
I'm completely agree Savita is a monster and she need to be jailed for doing all injustice done to Archu but i personally don't feel Manav need to speak in support of Archu yesterday,if he would have spoken in support of his mom then she would have done more tamasha in the function and Archu would have felt more disturbed. I an not saying he had to speak anything at all [ although i would have loved it if he gave his great mom a blasting one day ] ..........who is talking about speaking up for Archu here . But if Manav was silent when Archu was being called characterless , why was he not silent when his mom was slapped? Dono point pe chup raho na . Besides , when Manav did finally speak up , Savita was quiet and chupchap , she was covering her face and was chup . So this argument that he spoke up to avoid a tamasha is baseless . The tamasha actually was already over when Manav spoke up . It was the right point to leave the woman there and walk inside with the whole group .by putting his hand around his father [ not his sainted mom] . In fact , by putting his hand around his stupid mom , Manav rather spoilt the effect of that slap . Aisa kiya toh woh kabhi nahi sudharegi . Manav use sir par chada raha hai , clear and simple .
I think even Archu aayi should be jailed with Savita for harassing Manav as Sulochana has done nothing good even she has done the same what Savita has done to Archu.Savita use to ask dowry from Archu directly but in case of Sulochana she is not sending Archu to Manav because he is poor and is not earning more money than Satish so she is getting Archu married to satish so what is the difference b/w Savita and Sulochana both are expecting money than they children happiness one is asking directly by harassing and another one is asking indirectly by not trusting her son-in-law.Why shud Sulochana be jailed ? She is not committing any crime . She is a good mother in law..........see how she treats Manju . She doesnt demand jewels from Manjus home although Manju comes from rich family . She doesnt even take Manjus salary for the monthly family expenses........Manju lives phookat there , using the excuse that her money is for Punni , Punni Punni . She took her daughter home when her son in law's character was badly damaged in public by that evil Ajit , but to her credit , the policeman lied , what do u expect her to do ? And taking your daughter home is definetely not a crime . Sul;ochana may not always be correct but she is definetely not in the same league as Savita . Yes , both are wanting wealthy jamais and bahus for their children but the biggest diffrence between them is Savita wants ALL the money for HERSELF that comes in the house via the rishta [ See how she grabbed Archu's jewels on the first day itself and how she is hankering after Sharvani's wealth now ] .............whereas Sulochana wants all the wealth , status , happiness , for her children , not for personally herself or her husband . This is a very big diffrence . People are jailed when they demand dowry like Savita pressurized them later to give jewels ...........to my knowledge , Sulochana never committed that crime . She slapped Manav once in a fit of temper that was wrong , but later she coldly withdrew from his life wheras Savita made Archu slog like a slave in that chawl and followed her around after the break up , constantly flinging her character in her face , even in the office place , market , mandap of engagement , everywhere . Ajit assasinated Archu's character once , Savita assasinated it over and over again . Frankly , the woman doesn't need a slap , she needs a whipping .
I know Manav should have spoken in support of Archu but when women he is in love with is only able to not understand and convice her how can he convince his mom whom he know she is very rude and can hurt to any extent regard of not seeing the situation.
As manav has started to love Archu much before marriage so does it mean that only he has support her,trust her not Archu who told Manav on Satyanarayana pooja day that she can speak anything to Manav as she is very comfortable with him so where is that why can't she speak to him and clear evrey thing in stead he scold him as she is confident that he won't speak any thing against her for instance when Manav came to collect dd Archu scolded him later she only felt bad.Precisely my point . She clearly states that ab jaake woh apne aap ko comfortable mehsoos kar rahi hai . Thats not love ..........thats just getting to know someone , the first stage . Arre , how many days did their relationship have ?Only 15 . Just now she was getting ready to talk comfortably with him and this whole drama occured . One can hardly blame her as such .
Manav has never been a person who speaks against any one if i am not wrong he did not even speak against Sulochana when she accused him with so many bad things not even during marriage or even function.Here i agree with u totally . He did not speak up even to Sulochna , very true . But again , i find that a weakness , this not speaking up business . Whether its his mom or mother in law , when its ur character or even ur wife's , Learn to speak up and clear urself . Manav is the lead hero , he has to be smarter .
Savita is kind of women who can do any thing for money and i am sure Girish is thinking of making Sachin ghar jamayi which i am sure Savita will get big shock and will realize Archu is good than her another daughter-in-law. Of course that will happen ..........the marraige for which she was jumping with joy will give her maximum pain as she will lose her son totally . And frankly i wont blame Sachin for it , she desrves it . I wont blame Girish either , why shud he send his daughter to live in that hell hole .
And please don't defend Manav's dad drinking habit i know he is very good and supports Manav so dearly and fights for his happiness which we all know and in that Manav's dad and mom both insult each other in front of every one for each other bad habit.