Why Babita has to provoke him to drink Alcohol? - Page 2

Originally posted by: riti4u

Yeah I agree her intentions were right..just method was wrong. She tried to be Imarti rather than Babita in solving this issue..

My point is, if he is drinking himself and try to stop that’s a different issue. You don’t need to provoke him to drink and try to stop that a unrealistic, in real life it won’t happen.

Originally posted by: Indulatha

My point is, if he is drinking himself and try to stop that’s a different issue. You don’t need to provoke him to drink and try to stop that a unrealistic, in real life it won’t happen.

Babita wanted him to quit drinking. She wanted to put a full stop for once and forever.

Hence she laid the trap. The problem was, she overestimated herself. The emotional cause didn't work and the Imarti thing backfired.

both were equally right & wrong.......😆

babita had it in her mind that she'll go twisted way despite of knowing hs's typical attitude while HS as usual couldn't control his ego .

The showmakers could have easily taken the regular route where both of them could have confessed and started living together but as hatke and unconventional as they are they saved the whole Hanuman and Imarti angle for this part. I am happy that hanuman's past became an integral part of their writing. About yesterday's episode, they wanted to show that they are not on the same page yet and this Arch is here for two reasons. One Babita needs to step up and two Hanuman needs to move on. Even when the spotlight is on HS ... The story remains about Babita. Great work writers!

Originally posted by: Mishti_Dahi

That's cause she is unsure what effect can she have on him, directly. But since Imarti is a verified weapon, it's safe and easy to use it for her.😆

His blatant refusal might deepen her worries of being unworthy but I'm sure it'll get clarified soon.

I think it’s wrong of her to use his dead wife’s name to get him to do what she wants. It is cruel. It will be equivalent to Hs using Ashoks name to manipulate babita. She is guilty of doing this often when she doesn’t get her own way thru emotional blackmail, she resorts to using his wife.

It would be the end of the word if Hs kept bringing up ashok and babitas past to get her to do what he wants.

In the name of female emancipation (which I am ALL FOR) we should not step on man to gain it. Especially a good man. We cant demand equality yet special treatment in the same breath

Originally posted by: Mishti_Dahi

Babita wanted him to quit drinking. She wanted to put a full stop for once and forever.

Hence she laid the trap. The problem was, she overestimated herself. The emotional cause didn't work and the Imarti thing backfired.

She does not have a right to want this nor try and control his life. She is not his wife. Not so long ago she didn’t take too kindly to him “interfering” in her life yet now just cause she realises she loves him, yet isn’t willing to do anything about it, she wants to control his life.

You don’t help someone quit drinking by shoving it in their face and challenging them to drink. You do so by getting to the root cause of WHY they drink and helping them get through THAT.

I think they have showed babita being really ignorant here. To me it appeared about controlling him (the way she said to mini TODAY I WILL STOP HIM DRINKING). It is very insensitive of her not to support him and instead use her go to method of manipulation and that’s emotional blackmail.

Originally posted by: deefy89

She does not have a right to want this nor try and control his life. She is not his wife. Not so long ago she didn’t take too kindly to him “interfering” in her life yet now just cause she realises she loves him, yet isn’t willing to do anything about it, she wants to control his life.

You don’t help someone quit drinking by shoving it in their face and challenging them to drink. You do so by getting to the root cause of WHY they drink and helping them get through THAT.

I think they have showed babita being really ignorant here. To me it appeared about controlling him (the way she said to mini TODAY I WILL STOP HIM DRINKING). It is very insensitive of her not to support him and instead use her go to method of manipulation and that’s emotional blackmail.

Completely agree with you here. She has a massive ego herself and her insecurities make her want to stake her claim on him by proving that he will do as she asks. Why does loving her necessarily mean obeying her commands?

Especially, as you said she does not let him interfere. So why is it ok for her to.

Her intentions may have been good but the execution failed.

Originally posted by: deefy89

I think it’s wrong of her to use his dead wife’s name to get him to do what she wants. It is cruel. It will be equivalent to Hs using Ashoks name to manipulate babita. She is guilty of doing this often when she doesn’t get her own way thru emotional blackmail, she resorts to using his wife.

It would be the end of the word if Hs kept bringing up ashok and babitas past to get her to do what he wants.

In the name of female emancipation (which I am ALL FOR) we should not step on man to gain it. Especially a good man. We cant demand equality yet special treatment in the same breath

@bold

ITV has a hard time with this, though I think our writers will not go this way. Otherwise, they would not have shown HS calling her out for this or in the past for using the victim card. Great writing!

Originally posted by: deefy89

She does not have a right to want this nor try and control his life. She is not his wife. Not so long ago she didn’t take too kindly to him “interfering” in her life yet now just cause she realises she loves him, yet isn’t willing to do anything about it, she wants to control his life.

You don’t help someone quit drinking by shoving it in their face and challenging them to drink. You do so by getting to the root cause of WHY they drink and helping them get through THAT.

I think they have showed babita being really ignorant here. To me it appeared about controlling him (the way she said to mini TODAY I WILL STOP HIM DRINKING). It is very insensitive of her not to support him and instead use her go to method of manipulation and that’s emotional blackmail.

In the SBS interview she said she is trying this philosophy of giving someone excess of what they like. In that case they will start hating it after having too much of it. I don’t have a stand on her manipulating him. Also I think she got the confidence because Nayeem Bi kind of told Babita there are only 2 ppl who can stop him from drinking. It’s her and Imarti. Imarti isn’t here anymore and Babita doesn’t want to do anything about it. I think Mini’s and Nayeem Bi’s plan backfired.

Originally posted by: inlieu

Completely agree with you here. She has a massive ego herself and her insecurities make her want to stake her claim on him by proving that he will do as she asks. Why does loving her necessarily mean obeying her commands?

Especially, as you said she does not let him interfere. So why is it ok for her to.

Her intentions may have been good but the execution failed.

I don’t know if you have noticed but she does the same with mini. She forces her to do what she wants even if mini disagrees. It is ironic that when she needs advise she blindly does as mini says but other times mini is not meant to have a say. If mini objects she resorts to ridiculous threats and statements like “don’t you love/trust your mother” or “I’m not going to eat any food”. Like wth they need to show her seriously growing up. She can’t want control of others but at he same time have her daughter control her life. If it’s control she’s after she should apply it to her life.

I appreciate that she’s got insecurities, but she’s not the only one. Mini has them (which she often has to disregard for babitas sake) and Hs has them also. Very few ppl don’t