Under no condition I doubt attachment between Diwans and AD.
But fact is Siddhi is his mother. Sulekha is supposedly well-wisher of Siddhi so why not inform her son and AD about Siddhi? Try to build a good image?
Yes she coudln't tell where was Siddhi, as Kunal too have not told Ac about his real mother.
Fact is Sulekha made decision for Siddhi she was not entitled to.
I agreed that Siddhi's decision to take AD with her was wrong to say least but she is still his mother.
About Diwan's reputation; well Sulekha herself was in jail so really????
Also Sulekha assumed Kunal married Richa without substantial proof.
Now Kunal making enough money or not is irreverent to how Diwans have raised AD.
If Kunal had taken up expenses for AC than AD is spoiled? What kind of logic is that?
So you can either give good values or money?
Sure Sulekha has never said anything bad about Siddhi; but Kunal too doesn't let anyone speak of Siddhi in front of AC. AC too doesn't know about his mother and same goes for AD. So why such difference in evaluating both? AD is not just rude, he has no value of a mother what so ever. Sure Kunal didn't take expense for AC, but AC still yearns for and respects his mother. But if Diwan's have told Ad about his mother, it would not turn out very good?
Would we like if Kunal made enough money and AC was the way AD is? If Kunal was rich and raised his son to be the way Ad is right now, would we give excuse that's just how rich people raise their kids?
Seems Kunal's irresponsible behavior can serve as an excuse for everyone's behavior. Tomorrow others can kill someone out of malice but it won't be as bad as Kunal, right?
Edited by jay_bpm - 13 years ago