Originally posted by: slippery_chilka
Ah, that's true. Maybe Ruby chose to become Dayan after her graduation. There maybe an age where the female has to chose what she wants to be. Human or Dayan.The irony part. That is the sad truth isn't it? Even now with show people tend to get attracted, root for and defend the evil creatures more, while they find the protagonists boring and dull. What an era.I have noticed that..maybe Davansh have a harder time controlling their evil side than females do.___________(OK, the quote is messed up.😕 My answer from here)I believe humans are the most dangerous creatures that walk/ed the earth. I agree that humans are evil for killing for food but we are trying to change and more and more people are turning vegan. But comparison with humans donot make Daayans right, Rein. Just because I slapped someone and you joined in doesn't make you any less wrong. A wrong is a wrong. Do you get it? We both did wrong. So just because humans kill for food doesn't mean what Mohana and Ruby are doing is right or fair. They are still evil and antagonists of the story.I agree that both of us are wrong here, no one is more or less wrong than the other person when what we do is pretty much the same thing, and i never said what they are doing is right, all I am saying is they have their own reason for doing whatever they do. Moreover like you mentioned people are turning vegan and joining the vegan movement however there are also people who equally and passionately oppose it, which is why I say there are good and bad elements in every community. Ved herself is an example in this case if she doesn't turn out to be negative character as per my speculated guesswork. What i'm trying to point at is when we dont judge or incriminate humans for killing and eating defenceless animals and just plain accept them or ignore them for their choices why are we doing something different in case of daayans when they do the exact same thing to humans?You may not think the lineage reason maybe why Ved didn't have children. It may or may not be, until the reason is shown, you can't dismiss it just because you don't think that can be the reason. We will just have to wait and see. You asked why Ved may not have had children of her own and I gave you a reason.
Fair enoughI respect but don't agree with your POV over Ved raising Ansh and Kajal as her own and teaching them their sanskaar. She didnot snatch them but took them in when Mridul died and Mohana got imprisoned.I dont think she could have taken her children when they were still new borns given that they lived separately, moreover since Mo is a pretty powerful daayan if not the most powerful Ved getting her hands on the children would have been very difficult without the help of the Rathore family and Divya who cut off her choti rendering Mo powerless. My take is she was probably just waiting for the right moment to corner Mo.From what I understand she only took actions and ousted Mohana when Mohana killed Mridul and his mom. As long as everyone in the family had been safe, Ved wouldnot have ousted Mohana. Also, she has double the right to raise them as her own. One as Mohana's sister and one as Ansh and Kajal's aunt from Mridul's side. Also, Ansh and Kajal were protected from evil influence because Mohana was imprisoned. If Ved had had children, how would she have protected her children from Mohana? It would have been impossible.I do agree that Mohana seems to genuinely care for and love her children after the extension. Same with Ved, she is her little sister and I am sure she has some genuine affection for her even if it's mixed with anger. Which intrigues me and I can't wait to see her side of the story. But I do think Ved's hatred has to do with Mohana harming her family and nothing else because she seems to have tolerated/maybe even loved her as a sister before Mridul and his mom were killed by Mohana.BTW people Ved is not a Daayan. That is 100% obvious. As shown in the show, Dayans can't touch/bear anything holy without their Dayan side coming out.