Coordination - Page 8

Originally posted by: monu1101

One more e.g. of Judges being unfair is this week elimination episode.. i dont say the performance done by both the teams were great one. No it was not, but the judges in their own comments said Kanjali had good dance number with mistakes and Chetan-Lav dance though looked good was no way a dance. So in that case how do they give same marks to both.. For me as a smart viewer I can understand that it was actually done to make the episode more dramatic..

Thats ok pksanam.. everybody have their views.. I dont think so Chetan dance was worth a 8 that day..nope.. On any friday that kind of performance by any jodi would have earned a 6 or 7..

I think we are looking just one aspect of dance here i.e coordination, there are a lot more aspects to choreography and execution. I am not an expert in dance so I am not in position to comment if others deserved a 30 or Shajit did not deserve it earlier just for some mis coordination. But yes, I do agree on one point that at times judges do give ambegous reasons as Arjun told Kanjali that he expected something more. I expect them to be more clear like mis coordination in mirror act of Naman and Megha. If they pin point on why they are deducting marks for a mistake or why they are overlooking the same, of course with valid reasons, would actually clarify a lot of webs from our minds. I support Shajit and I found all the performances outstanding where they got 30, I think they deserved it, as per dance forms, all the dances we have seen have already been performed even like that of sholder act or jugalbandi at different shows etc. Anyway, choreographers do not find new dance forms but they apply existing forms to a song to bring the best effects and convey the meaning to the fullest at the same time.

[quote=kaushikbasu]I think we are looking just one aspect of dance here i.e coordination, there are a lot more aspects to choreography and execution. I am not an expert in dance so I am not in position to comment if others deserved a 30 or Shajit did not deserve it earlier just for some mis coordination. But yes, I do agree on one point that at times judges do give ambegous reasons as Arjun told Kanjali that he expected something more. I expect them to be more clear like mis coordination in mirror act of Naman and Megha. If they pin point on why they are deducting marks for a mistake or why they are overlooking the same, of course with valid reasons, would actually clarify a lot of webs from our minds. [/quote]

Agree with you

I think, there should be an episode in which all the jodi's get a 30, no matter how the performance.

My god.

Its just a show, their just people, its for entertainment.....


Reality shows will NEVER please everyone, there will always be someone finding qualms regarding something, just accept it for what it is, and I honestly don't think anyone is technically bashing a jodi, Its just that when one gets a bit passionate about their favorite, the connotation might seem negative.

It's a never ending debate.

Originally posted by: monu1101

Thats ok pksanam.. everybody have their views.. I dont think so Chetan dance was worth a 8 that day..nope.. On any friday that kind of performance by any jodi would have earned a 6 or 7..

Originally posted by: tashmin

I think, there should be an episode in which all the jodi's get a 30, no matter how the performance.

My god.

Its just a show, their just people, its for entertainment.....


Reality shows will NEVER please everyone, there will always be someone finding qualms regarding something, just accept it for what it is, and I honestly don't think anyone is technically bashing a jodi, Its just that when one gets a bit passionate about their favorite, the connotation might seem negative.

It's a never ending debate.

Originally posted by: pksanam

they gave marks according to the concept plus dance, both.. Kanjali had more dance but lots of coordination mistakes.. even Chetan-Lav had coordination problems but since they were doing totally different things.. their mistakes seemed less magnified.. and with Kanjali dance, the mistakes looked even bigger.. hence the marks.. although, Kanjali did deserve to stay.. so i am glad..

Originally posted by: pksanam

well, yes.. if i was a judge, i'd give Chetan-Lav 7, max.. but also, for Kanjali.. they didn't fare that well, so about 8 max.. that when we are comparing the two..

but from their usual standard, Kanjali didn't do that great.. normally, i'd give them 9 or 10... and Chetan-Lav around 8 or so.. hope that makes sense.. 😕

Well thats the whole point here.. The point is not that Kanjali should have got a 9 or 10 for that performance.. But the other important thing is even Chetan Lav could not have given marks same as Kanjali.. I mean as you say a 7 for Chetan and a 8 for Kanjali would have been enough.. But judges didnt do that..Why? Thats the question mark here..

This is all I have to say….Just because we support to different jodi..doesn't mean everyone has to argue…!!!

Arguing is not always the answer…we should appreciate each other for having difference of opinion..

If we all had the same view on things then there would be nothing to discuss…

Ppl please lets not offend each other…and appreciate everyone for their individual outlook on things as well…as well admire all the Jodi's for putting in long hours in rehearsal and wonderful performances