Heya guys, whatever I am writing is completely my personal opinion, and I have no intention to offend any sentiments here regarding the original text. What I am trying to point out is the twisted Ramayan context of the 3 main families here - Sharmas, Mathurs, and Singhanias. It's like the families are designed in a very weird style which reminds me of Ramayan.
Sharmas and Mithila
Four Sisters, Sita the adopted sister, avatar of Lakshmi. Favorite of Janak.
Four Sisters, Bani the adopted sister, and the one with special powers (Naagin). Father completely dotes on Bani. The only difference is the Cinderella-type twist added to it. One step-sister adores her, and the other two stepsisters and mother hardly care for her.
Singhanias and Ayodhya (**I know its the weirdest thing, but I told you its a twisted Ramayan.)
Four Brothers. Ram the favorite son and also an avatar of Vishnu. Dasharath the overprotective dad. Stepmother Kaikaye.
Five Brothers (Daksh who may not live too long). Two brothers belong to the younger brother. Veer the favorite sarphira son. Overprotective greedy dad Balwant on the lookout for Naagin. A stepmother (maybe??). The twist in the tale is that they are shady, filthy rich, and criminals. They don't have a moral compass or conscience, to begin with, and they feed on the dead.
Mathurs and Lanka (**Now, don't get me wrong here either. But main kya karun? Sabki family setting hi ajeeb hai.🤔)
Ravan, the big brother. Surpanakha - the annoying tantrum oriented sister, Vibhishan - the wise brother
Big brother Jai looks after business. Two other siblings - Arohi, the borderline overprotective sister and Ayush, the loving goofy brother. Absent senior members, only shown once.
Can someone please care to explain, why these 3 families have been written this way?
Will all four Sharma sisters marry all the four existing Singhania brothers like in Ramayan?
Will Jai turn into Ravan?
Is Veer, a Ram in the making or something?
I really want to understand why have these families been written this way because it has been a while since I am getting this feeling. Sharmas are still fine. But in Singhanias and Mathurs case, the Ayodhya and Lanka context is totally reversed.
**And please again, don't take it personally. I don't mean to offend anyone. It is just a personal view.**
Please do share your views on this.😳