Latest Developments - Page 7

Originally posted by: PARADOX 1

and they didnt consumate... they just kissed.

Originally posted by: Kavya_KraZQueen

Hawww Caro, how can you question the 'purity' of MN's lowe? Mayank only 'worshipped' Nupur yesterday and then she 'worshipped' him back - how could you not see the 'passionate worship' ? 😳 😳 Stop being a hypocrite now 😡.

Actually people stuck in barns 'worship' using twigs, don't you know? 'Twig worshiping' between couples 'emotionally bonds' them forever no matter how far they go from each other, that is what our dearest PD ji tried to convey to us 😳 😳 I hear a similar 'lowe technique' worked in Timbaktoo a few centuries before we were born.

Originally posted by: Kavya_KraZQueen

Hawww Caro, how can you question the 'purity' of MN's lowe? Mayank only 'worshipped' Nupur yesterday and then she 'worshipped' him back - how could you not see the 'passionate worship' ? 😳 😳 Stop being a hypocrite now 😡.

Actually people stuck in barns 'worship' using twigs, don't you know? 'Twig worshiping' between couples 'emotionally bonds' them forever no matter how far they go from each other, that is what our dearest PD ji tried to convey to us 😳 😳 I hear a similar 'lowe technique' worked in Timbaktoo a few centuries before we were born.

Originally posted by: sarah1024

PD, at this rate they might as well have consummated. What was left anyway? They'd already gone through with half the process. That didn't look like just kissing in any shape or form.

And by the way, why the assurance that they didn't sleep together? What's the big deal even if they had? Is it ONLY sex that would make their act blasphemous? As long as they didn't go all the way through, the rest of the chuma-chaati was perfectly okay? Come on, that reeks of double standards!

I'm not narrow minded; nor am I opposed to intimacy. But it's rather strange that in order to satisfy the fans, a scene that would OBVIOUSLY classify as a sex scene is passed off as "just kissing". Why? Because the writers do not want to portray their protagonists as sinners but at the same time, they'd like to capture the fans' attention. The solution? Simple - show the couple frolicking around in a deserted barn and doing pretty much everything BUT the one technical thing that would make them "impure". As if that makes a difference.

Either show the couple doing the deed after frolicking around or don't show that scene at all. In a normal world, there's no such thing as "pure" passionate encounters that lead nowhere. Most desi people are either are advanced enough to sleep together OR they prefer not to engage in anything that's inappropriately sexual until they get married. What's with this new middle ground that these youth shows seem to have invented?

And speaking of random barn escapades, MJHT isn't the only Star One show I'm talking about here.

Originally posted by: carolinecj

my bad!!! i thought all products are adulterated and so is love.. except this is adult-rated instead of adulterated😆

he was PASS-ON-ATE-LY worshipping her😲Sahi Jawaab! He would have built a temple for her with the 'twigs of pure lowe' if the editing hadn't played the spoil sport 😡


oh right so the twigs were incense sticks for the worship!!!!!! and he was talking about candles jalao-ing too!!! in the fire-proof barn!!


moi..the hypocirte.. me likes bring the hypocrite😳


I did see the "BONDING"..nothing emosanal about that except the BGM..it was more AHEM AHEM ish!

Originally posted by: sarah1024

PD, at this rate they might as well have consummated. What was left anyway? They'd already gone through with half the process. That didn't look like just kissing in any shape or form.

And by the way, why the assurance that they didn't sleep together? What's the big deal even if they had? Is it ONLY sex that would make their act blasphemous? As long as they didn't go all the way through, the rest of the chuma-chaati was perfectly okay? Come on, that reeks of double standards!

I'm not narrow minded; nor am I opposed to intimacy. But it's rather strange that in order to satisfy the fans, a scene that would OBVIOUSLY classify as a sex scene is passed off as "just kissing". Why? Because the writers do not want to portray their protagonists as sinners but at the same time, they'd like to capture the fans' attention. The solution? Simple - show the couple frolicking around in a deserted barn and doing pretty much everything BUT the one technical thing that would make them "impure". As if that makes a difference.

Either show the couple doing the deed after frolicking around or don't show that scene at all. In a normal world, there's no such thing as "pure" passionate encounters that lead nowhere. Most desi people are either are advanced enough to sleep together OR they prefer not to engage in anything that's inappropriately sexual until they get married. What's with this new middle ground that these youth shows seem to have invented?

And speaking of random barn escapades, MJHT isn't the only Star One show I'm talking about here.

Originally posted by: Kavya_KraZQueen

@blue: Ahem ahems are also emosans , only they are of an 'intimate' kind , you are so 'narrow-minded' , you should learn to be 'broad-minded'. Can't you watch these scenes on MN when you can watch scenes in Bollywood movies n umreecan shows that need to be censored? 🤢