Pallavi's flip flops, DT Note Page 4, 6 - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

44

Views

3.9k

Users

14

Likes

128

Frequent Posters

canuck-umz thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: Deus_Vult

@bold Only after very long time after marriage..His initial behavior towards Pallavi was not at all acceptable but she still forgave him anyway. And was willing to work with him to extend her business.. Not a behavior someone would expect from mahaan pallavi who would send people to jail for accidents.


Again this was not just an accident, it was a hit and run that resulted in someone's death. Neither Raghav nor Sulochana have killed anyone. If Keerti and Sunny had stayed at the scene and tried to help Mandaar then Pallavi wouldn't have been like this. If it wasn't Keerti and Sunny, say it was Sulo or RR who had caused the accident, Pallavi would have reacted the same way.

BlackWitch thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#12

Just because she was married for a day, is she supposed to excuse that her husband lost his life due to Sunny and Keerti? It was an accident, okay. But they didn’t help the victim and ran away. When confronted, there was no remorse in either of their hearts. How strange to compare the actual loss of someone’s life to a necklace. Both are very different crimes in terms of severity.


Pallavi and her family suffered due to Mandaar’s loss. Her life came to a standstill. She has been looking for the culprit for years. I find it perfectly normal for her to want to punish Keerti and Sunny for that, who have absolutely no shame for destroying a life.

And how is a murder (a hit and run is a deliberate act, unlike an accident) comparable to theft or even the kind of sick things Sulo or Raghav have done? They belong on vastly different planes. You don’t get a second chance when a life is lost due to the deliberate decision of someone.


Edited by braveheartdoc - 4 years ago
Deus_Vult thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: canuck-umz


Again this was not just an accident, it was a hit and run that resulted in someone's death. Neither Raghav nor Sulochana have killed anyone. If Keerti and Sunny had stayed at the scene and tried to help Mandaar then Pallavi wouldn't have been like this. If it wasn't Keerti and Sunny, say it was Sulo or RR who had caused the accident, Pallavi would have reacted the same way.

Not really.. Mandaar is not dead.

Deus_Vult thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: gurl-enchanted

I don’t understand the logic of duration of marriage to the severity of a hit and run crime. Just because she was married for a day, is she supposed to excuse that her husband lost his life due to Sunny and Keerti? It was an accident, okay. But they didn’t help the victim and ran away. When confronted, there was no remorse in either of their hearts. How strange to compare the actual loss of someone’s life to a necklace. Both are very different crimes in terms of severity.


Pallavi and her family suffered due to Mandaar’s loss. Her life came to a standstill. She has been looking for the culprit for years. I find it perfectly normal for her to want to punish Keerti and Sunny for that, who have absolutely no shame for destroying a life.

And how is a murder (a hit and run is a deliberate act, unlike an accident) comparable to theft or even the kind of sick things Sulo or Raghav have done? They belong on vastly different planes. You don’t get a second chance when a life is lost due to the deliberate decision of someone.

Blaming Pallavi for seeking justice is pretty much victim blaming here.

Nobody is blaming Pallavi here... I'm only saying that the story writers should write her character in a better way. She shouldn't be showing double standards to different people at different times.. That just makes her a hypocrite.

This was an accident... I agree that they ran away but still was an accident.

Is attempt to murder doesn't have the same severity in your eyes? What about taking nude photos and then trapping a girl on charges of prostitution?

canuck-umz thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: Deus_Vult

Not really.. Mandaar is not dead.


He was dead for 2 years and Pallavi wanted to bring the culprit to justice because she didn't know Mandaar was alive. Pallavi was doing the right thing. Anyways, the only reason Mandaar is not dead is because RR helped him not the people who did the hit and run. Him being alive doesn't negate that Sunny and Keerti committed a crime. Sunny should still be charged for that.

Phir_Mohabbat thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#16

This BWA and kirti comparison need to stop. We all need to re-watch the epi and understand what happened cause for some viewers it's still pallos fault that BWA got away. Huh?

LondonFan thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#17

You are comparing different crimes that didn’t involve death.


Abortion drama wasn’t criminal and Pallavi kept quiet for Mansi’s sake. Pallavi left the Kirti picture crime to Raghav to decide. Raghav is the one who decided to let Soluchana go. Even with jewellery theft, Pallavi in the end wanted to throw Soluchana into jail.

However, what Raghav did to her in the beginning was a crime and she should have punished him. I have said several times that Pallavi forgives Raghav too quickly. She let it go because only she was hurt and no one died so I can understand why she forgave him. I won’t forgive that easily but this is a show.




Deus_Vult thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago
#18

Originally posted by: LondonFan

You are comparing different crimes that didn’t involve death.


Abortion drama wasn’t criminal and Pallavi kept quiet for Mansi’s sake. Pallavi left the Kirti picture crime to Raghav to decide. Raghav is the one who decided to let Soluchana go. Even with jewellery theft, Pallavi in the end wanted to throw Soluchana into jail.

Nope Raghav said that BWA had to accept her crimes in front of VD but she didn't... And they didn't care about BWA after that. Yes Raghav decided to let sulochana go for which I'm extremely angry with Raghav...but then Raghav also decided to forgive Keerti for the accident but that didn't stop pallavi from plotting against her to send her to jail nah.. Now you will say that the victim was pallavi's ex husband but then in the case of Keerti, she is her sister in law when the truth about the leaked photos came out. Does Keerti mean anything to pallavi?


However, what Raghav did to her in the beginning was a crime and she should have punished him. I have said several times that Pallavi forgives Raghav too quickly. She let it go because only she was hurt and no one died so I can understand why she forgave him. I won’t forgive that easily but this is a show.




I didn't bring abortion over here but thanks for bringing that here..

Abortion is the deliberate killing of an unborn child and hence is state sanctioned murder but anyway...

Phir_Mohabbat thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#19

Hainh?? Abortion how it's related to pallo anyway? Amrutha did it, her body her choice.

Deus_Vult thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago
#20

Originally posted by: gurl-enchanted

Please don’t make such sweeping statement about a sensitive subject like abortion. The ignorance in this line is just shocking. Have you faced it? Has anyone close to you facedNOPE.

Do you know what happens in countries to women who don’t have the right to abort safely?

Women have an abortion for multiple reasons and should have the right to prioritise their health and well being over an unborn being. This battle has been hard won after years of struggle in many countries and in places where women don’t have this right, they go through a lot of mental and physical trauma. Some even lose their own lives. THAT is state sanctioned murder, not abortion.

The fetus (not child) does NOT have any rights as long as it is attached to another person. It’s existence does not override that of the woman who carries it in her own body. The mother has the right to decide whether she wants to carry through the pregnancy. No one else can decide what happens in her body.

What you have expressed on this subject is a terribly insensitive statement to make so casually. I request you to research more into this.

Sorry... Cant agree with ANY of your views.. Abortion is murder no matter how much you try to justify it. I support abortion in extremely rare cases of rape and when the mother's life is in danger BUT most abortions happen NOT because of these issues.

Your choice ends when you chose to have unprotected sex. Its not the baby's fault. RIGHT TO LIFE is the MOST fundamental right and nothing goes above that so NOPE.

Being attached to someone doesn't mean you have the right to kill them. Siamese twins are attached to each other and are dependent on each other. That doesn't mean that one twin have the right to kill another twin. Why should a child suffer for YOUR mistakes?

Also the baby has a different DNA, different flesh and different blood. That is NOT YOUR BODY AND THAT IS NOT YOUR CHOICE.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".