Great analysis. I have always said that Pallavi, and even the Deshmuks, aren't obliged to accept and love Raghav or the Raos in general. Even if she forgives him (because she's a kind person and accepting by nature), she may not forget, she may not trust him or choose him as her life partner. There is nothing wrong with it and no one can do anything about it. She doesn't owe him anything. For that matter, even after Pallavi forgives Raghav and their 'scores are settled', he doesn't really owe her anything, not even to stay married to her. If she chooses to treat their relationship as a marriage of convenience, that is her call, but in no way is there a guarantee that she will love him back.
The main issue I see with Pallavi is that she is too selfless for her own good. It hurts her in the end, unfortunately. I understand her nature is so, but it gets her in trouble repeatedly. She doesn't take time to process things when people hurt her, doesn't hold people accountable, and doesn't demand that she is given her due. Even with Raghav, she didn't ask him to fix things, she just decided to quietly leave for Kolhapur. He was the one who stopped her and put forward the 30-day challenge, which she agreed to.
Her love, no obsession, for the Deshmukhs may be hard for most of us to digest - heck, I find it over-the-top - but that's her reality. Amma did mention something interesting, that just because Raghav thinks the Deshmukhs are a crazy bunch of egoistic people doesn't mean that Pallavi has to sever her bonds with them. We don't choose our families and she didn't either. I won't bother getting into my annoyance at her treatment of Siddhesh and his apparent lack of importance in her life, as it's been done to death here. Back to the Deshmukhs, if she had indeed been the daughter of the house, i.e. related to them by blood, and they had behaved this way with her, would we have been as judgemental of the Deshmukhs. It's easy to play the sautela/paraya card but often in real life we see dysfunctional families where the parents fail to understand their daughter, do not really care for her wellbeing and do kick them out, disown them, or punish them in some manner for bringing 'shame on the family'? Because they are legally and socially her in-laws, it's easy for us to say she should leave them? Would we have said the same if they were really her family? Many would, in the name of women's emancipation, but a lot of people wouldn't. She has to work with what she has, like many of us do. Based on what Sharda said in an earlier episode, Vijay and Mandaar would also argue about many things, presumably differences in philosophy, and Sharda would be sandwiched in between.
One more thing, I know she rarely talks about Mandaar, but from the few comments she's made about him, especially to Krishna and Raghav, it's clear she has put him on a pedestal and has signed a lifetime contract with herself to keep his memory alive through her actions and interactions with his family. They in turn keep him alive in their memories as an extension of Pallav, in many ways. Pallavi feeling indebted to them, as we heard when she explained to Raghav what they did for, is what ties her to them to a large extent. However, I am sure that even when she gets her wings and has a successful career and life as simply Pallavi, she will still feel some emotional attachment to them and will make sure they are looked after. Mandaar's promise is a huge deal for her, she has always wanted to do for his parents what he would have done had he been alive, and I doubt this commitment of hers will go away any time soon, if ever. Raghav will have to understand this, accept it, and live with it.
Raghav and Pallavi as husband-wife, soulmates, life partners in the true sense? Again, there are no guarantees. I know they both have a lot of trauma and loneliness to deal with, but can they overcome their respective past to help one another heal and build a new life together? Possibly, if the family drama doesn't wear them down by dragging them into endless cycles of problem-solving where they do not spend quality time together. Pallavi doesn't see herself as a member of the Rao family 100% yet because her heart and mind are always with the Deshmukhs, longing for them. If there hadn't been a fallout, she may have been able to focus on the Raos more. I am guessing this is why she hasn't focused on Keerti, Amma, or even Raghav so much beyond what is connected to the Deshmukhs.
I know a lot of people think Raghav is in love with her but I am still skeptical as it's too soon. The Raghav Rao I saw in the early episodes would have a different fire to him when in love. I think he's remorseful and laser-focused on repairing the damage he caused, and she is his first priority now. He may have tried to gauge if she'd consider spending the rest of her life with him but I don't know if he himself has thought through what being married to Pallavi for good would actually mean for his life. He is very lonely, even after Amma and Keerti have moved in with him, as they haven't really bonded. They have not addressed their tragic past and have are just maintaining the status quo. Even Pallavi was quick to notice this. In Pallavi he finds a distraction, as well as a companion. He wasn't being flippant when he told Farhad or her about them being friends first. If he hadn't been so fixated on making amends, I am sure sooner or later he would have started to feel troubled by the emotional distance between Amma, Keerti and him despite living under the same roof.
His past has not been explored yet, but we know there is bound to be a lot ugliness there that we'll learn about when the time comes. His panic attack and feeling of suffocation before Pallavi fainted was not just because of his realization of his grave mistake but also because the trauma of his past was weaved into it. He went into a dark spot for a moment before Farhad and Amma helped him refocus on the present, and on helping Pallavi. For a man who is principled, to have gone against his principle of not hurting innocents and in fact causing her such grave harm, is not easy to take. His conscience is not dead, it has never been. He just chooses not to dwell on it too much in general, but this time he could not look away.
You've pointed out something that we often don't pause to reflect on. We see the 360 degrees of the show, its characters, their motivations, and their dynamics, but the characters individually don't. Pallavi cannot see a lot of what Raghav does and why, she just sees the end results and goes by that. Raghav does the same too. Now that they are living in close quarters, they actually have the opportunity to observe each other in more detail, but keep in mind Raghav is living with the Deshmukhs and not really telling Pallavi what's going on or what he's planning. How is she to know and see his efforts. Also, we know Raghav is the kind of person who keeps his cards close to his chest, so no one else knows what he's strategizing and how he'll execute his plans. So expecting Pallavi to understand this is futile. Similarly, he misjudged her in earlier tracks because he was only seeing the impact of what he thought she was doing without being privy to he details.
I have said this on many other threads but will say it here again. Aside from the fact that they were forced to get married, everything else in their relationship is pretty much like an arranged marriage where they are getting to know one another and slowly adjusting to and accepting each other's quirks. It takes couples a while to settle down, and some never do. Same is the case for our leads. They don't really know much about each other beyond the superficial but things have started to move gradually on that front. Pallavi explaining to Raghav why the Deshmukhs were so important to her and then talking about her dreams (that also involved them) gave him a much better insight into her wishes and pain points. There will come a time when their roles will be reversed, and she in turn will learn more about what makes the way he is.
Sorry, this response became longer than I had intended but it was lovely to read your thoughts. Please do post more as we love discussions on this forum.
Edited by inlieu - 4 years ago