Mahabharat Retelecast Discussion Thread 5 - Page 15

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

Panchali was asked to be staked as political move. She was the princess of Panchal and Indraprastha's finance minister.

I do believe you're right about Kauravas wanting to create the rift. I think the marriage offer was genuine. If she changed sides, the Pandavsz wouldnbe forever finished.

Same for 2nd dice game. Her name was included in the exile contract. She didn't go out of special love for Pandavas or thirst for revenge. She went because she was part of the contract.

Which marriage offer ?

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Partially right but not completely.

Pandavas weren't into the staking spree only Yudhishtir was, and Yudhishtir didn't have the right upon the wives/children of his younger brothers. He only had rights on his wives/children and brothers (since their father was dead)

Staking wife was a right of the husband is something which was completely accepted in that court. They accepted completely that wife was a property of the husband.

The only bone of contention or legal loophole was if a person retains that right after becoming a slave.

As per Karna the three types of people who can't own a thing are Women, students and slaves, he meant to state that everything a slave owns becomes that of his master automatically, hence Draupadi and and Pandavas wives automatically became their property, but then Yudhishtir had replayed that game staking her, so how could it be legal. This was her point.

Coming to Devika, she isn't mentioned anywhere later, I think she could been dead by then

No devika was not dead 4 sure coz as very less had been said about Pandavas other wives but if devika was dead then it would had been told in d epic.

Bheem's son sarvang from balandhara also survived d war , he later became king of kashi I read somewhere.

I read she was present in Hastinapur when Pandavas returned 2 Hastinapur after marriage with draupadi , when she saw bheem she fell 4 him as she had already heard about him a lot later bheem 2 fell 4 her. Later he approached king of kashi & entertained him with his wrestling power & offered his strength to him in return wanted hand of balandhara.

Somewhere I read he won her in a swayamber.

Bheem was really handsome , well built , tall not fatty kind of .

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

No devika was not dead 4 sure coz as very less had been said about Pandavas other wives but if devika was dead then it would had been told in d epic.

Bheem's son sarvang from balandhara also survived d war , he later became king of kashi I read somewhere.

I read she was present in Hastinapur when Pandavas returned 2 Hastinapur after marriage with draupadi , when she saw bheem she fell 4 him as she had already heard about him a lot later bheem 2 fell 4 her. Later he approached king of kashi & entertained him with his wrestling power & offered his strength to him in return wanted hand of balandhara.

Somewhere I read he won her in a swayamber.

Bheem was really handsome , well built , tall not fatty kind of .

I don't think the deaths have been mentioned. She wasn't there during Rajsuya or Ashwamedh, while other Pandavas wife were there and her not being present at her husband's Yagyas does raise suspicion

Bheem Balandhra love story I have no idea about. Could be as you said

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

Panchali was asked to be staked as political move. She was the princess of Panchal and Indraprastha's finance minister.

I do believe you're right about Kauravas wanting to create the rift. I think the marriage offer was genuine. If she changed sides, the Pandavsz wouldnbe forever finished.

Same for 2nd dice game. Her name was included in the exile contract. She didn't go out of special love for Pandavas or thirst for revenge. She went because she was part of the contract.

@Bold genuine marriage offer after calling her into court dragged in a scantly clad attire? Sorry I doubt that was in the cards.

If that was the plan they didn't even need to insist that Draupadi was a slave, the moment Draupadi said that she couldn't a property of a slave they could have come up, that since wives are properties and since Draupadi denies being the same of slaves(Pandavas), she therefore becomes a lady with no husband.

Dusshashan had therefore got a lady with no husband from her chamber to the royal hall, this simply would constitute a Rakshas Vivah no other marriage ceremony or her acceptance was needed.

Yes Draupadi was surely asked to stake for political reasons, but they definitely hadn't realised her true potential until she gained her, her husbands' independence and all property.

Nothing there suggest they had thought of a respectful marriage to Draupadi if she allows, they didn't realize then that Draupadi could turn tables for them

Originally posted by: Mages

at least he is doing something rather than social distancing🤣

🤣

Vaise I read draupadi marriage with Pandavas were held for 5 days with suhaagraat will every pandav but consummation was not allowed in any marriage till draupadi get married 2 all 5 Pandavas.

In that serial it was shown correct even draupadi Sahara one also showed draupadi married Pandavas seperately in 5 days with suhaagraat.

Originally posted by: Mages

this is something rare...🤣

Nhi seriously till now, I had a crush on Sahdev. I often tell my husband that if ever time machine is built in our lifetime, I would divorce him and travel to Mahabharata era for marrying Sahdev.

That day after having watched Nakul Draupadi Suhagraat, I was like yaar now I am confused ki time machine banega to Sahdev se shaadi karun ya Nakul se.

Patidev kehte hain, tum jaana na wahan Duryodhan ko chhod kar koi nhi milega tumko

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

Vaise I read draupadi marriage with Pandavas were held for 5 days with suhaagraat will every pandav but consummation was not allowed in any marriage till draupadi get married 2 all 5 Pandavas.

In that serial it was shown correct even draupadi Sahara one also showed draupadi married Pandavas seperately in 5 days with suhaagraat.

This I don't know

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

Vaise I read draupadi marriage with Pandavas were held for 5 days with suhaagraat will every pandav but consummation was not allowed in any marriage till draupadi get married 2 all 5 Pandavas.

In that serial it was shown correct even draupadi Sahara one also showed draupadi married Pandavas seperately in 5 days with suhaagraat.

Yes I read somewhere. It was needed for Draupadi to remain virgin to marry all Pandavas because only virgin ladies can marry. Tbh it was a BS rule.

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Nhi seriously till now, I had a crush on Sahdev. I often tell my husband that if ever time machine is built in our lifetime, I would divorce him and travel to Mahabharata era for marrying Sahdev.

That day after having watched Nakul Draupadi Suhagraat, I was like yaar now I am confused ki time machine banega to Sahdev se shaadi karun ya Nakul se.

Patidev kehte hain, tum jaana na wahan Duryodhan ko chhod kar koi nhi milega tumko

@bold...🤣