Well if that be said TheWatcher, then almost every character brought upon Kurukshetra War.
Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discusdion Topic - 2nd Nov 2025 - WKV
🏏ICC Women's World Cup 2025: South Africa W vs India W, FINAL🏏
BILLI IN BASKET 2.11
BEIJJATI AT PEAKS 1.11
🏏India tour of Australia, 2025: AUS vs IND,3rd T20I, Oval🏏
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 03 Nov 2025 EDT
Should Salman Khan finally find a girl to marry on his 60th birthday?
Amitabh and Abhishek don’t wish Aishwarya Rai on social media
Favourite couple : Nov.1, 2025.Best epi. HD Clip. 😆😆
Aishwarya Rai at fault for ruining Salman's life?
Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2 - Banner Contest
Hahahahahahaha: New nicknames for Gen 4 lead couple.
GOLGUPPA PARTY 3.11
Well if that be said TheWatcher, then almost every character brought upon Kurukshetra War.
Originally posted by: TheWatcher
Maybe I got carried away with Starbharat, So, was Bhima was born with the strength of 10,000 elephants?
If he was, wasn't it unfair for Duryodhana that his rival was born with immense strength and bullied him throughout his before gurukul days. At least Arjuna and Karna were sons of major gods unlike Duryodhan.My opinion is that Bhima himself bought the destruction of Kuru's by mercilessly bullying Duryodhana , no big brother would silently see himself (and his brothers) getting insulted infront of his 99 brothers, let alone Duryodhan who had a large ego.
U r right. No one is completely evil.Originally posted by: Sabhayata
@amritat:I don't think dury was evil though
Yes he did commit some inexcusable crimes against pandavas for which he deserved to get punished
but he wasn't terrible towards the society at large only towards panadvas.there are instances in the epic where it is mentioned that he indulged in welfare of the other's and Brahmins ,where he shows great respect to Bhishma even Narad in the end says to Yudi that dury has obtained heaven because he did preform his other kshatriya duties well
So yes he wasn't as righteous as pandvas but i wont call him evil as well
U r right. No one is completely evil.
I called Duryodha evil, coz that's how he is addressed in the epic.Duryodhan is called wicked, every many times by the narrator.So, going by the epic, and some of his deeds, he was "evil", atleast from one angle.
Originally posted by: TheWatcher
Maybe I got carried away with Starbharat, So, was Bhima was born with the strength of 10,000 elephants?
If he was, wasn't it unfair for Duryodhana that his rival was born with immense strength and bullied him throughout his before gurukul days. At least Arjuna and Karna were sons of major gods unlike Duryodhan.My opinion is that Bhima himself bought the destruction of Kuru's by mercilessly bullying Duryodhana , no big brother would silently see himself (and his brothers) getting insulted infront of his 99 brothers, let alone Duryodhan who had a large ego.
Draupadi, coz no woman should reject a King 🤢. And no woman can let her molesters be unpunished. Hence the war.
Originally posted by: ..RamKiJanaki..
I agree with all your points but this one.So as per this point, I do not agree she did wrong.
I don't think dhrit could really do duty of a king.no kingship quality is there apparent.a king is not just supposed to sit on throne. a king is leader who leads his army, who takes decisions, who keeps everyone in check, sometimes even personally go in praja and look for wrongs. dhrit could do none of these. may b I sound cruel but this is truth. how dhrit could do these.let us say hypothetically some minister like bheeshma(if he was not bheeshma we knew) try to unsurp him from throne, or did something really wrong to praja how would dhrit b able to forge his authority?if drit can do the duties of the king when Pandu was in forest , then he could as well be appointed as the king in the first place .. If you think like that , then Vidur has caused the war ...
I have to say Mahabharat is the most intriguing and exciting piece of literature ever written ...