Mahabharat Episode Discussion Thread # 17 - Page 117

I hope we get a promo for the final episode.

Originally posted by: AnuMP

Sadhana

Since they are doing a creative interpretation, I want them to show Draupadi dying a peaceful death in her bed in ArDi year. Then the Pandavas can go and fall off the mountain. I dont think they will ever show Krishnas death, they may show it as news brought to Pandavas

But I do hope, they show an epilogue with the characters' ends. And as you said one good scene between ParAv and GoLi. Too bad they wont be able to do a KaJu in an epilogue - they have been the supercouple of the show😆

😆 That is some really CREATIVE interpretation. Could I add on to it-Arjun too dies with her, before he hears of Madhav's death. I somehow cannot imagine what that loss might have meant for him, so I would want him to be spared of some pain in his last moments.

Originally posted by: AnuMP

Sadhana

Since they are doing a creative interpretation, I want them to show Draupadi dying a peaceful death in her bed in ArDi year. Then the Pandavas can go and fall off the mountain. I dont think they will ever show Krishnas death, they may show it as news brought to Pandavas

But I do hope, they show an epilogue with the characters' ends. And as you said one good scene between ParAv and GoLi. Too bad they wont be able to do a KaJu in an epilogue - they have been the supercouple of the show😆

Originally posted by: -Shani-

I hope we get a promo for the final episode.

The last promo we got was for the "Dharmayudh" mahamovie.

And if you don't count that, then it was Drona vadh.

Too many episodes have since gone without a promo.

Perhaps, if a promo does get released for the final episode, it might clear up a few things about what the CVs intend to show in the end.

there is a new promo divya, u can't call it brand new cos it's d combination of satyavati promo,bhishma pratigya, kaurava birth, VH n all...it had krishna in d BG saying smthing which I don't remember😛

Originally posted by: Sadhana_pr

😆 That is some really CREATIVE interpretation. Could I add on to it-Arjun too dies with her, before he hears of Madhav's death. I somehow cannot imagine what that loss might have meant for him, so I would want him to be spared of some pain in his last moments.

well, i have only one thing to say, let's just wait and watch.

Originally posted by: amritat

It was no war for "Samaj ka Kayan", atleast by the Pandavas. However, they did want their share of the land back, which they thought were rightfully theirs. And Draupadi's revenge honestly had no meaning. Yes, Draupadi wanted revenge, but her husbands didn't care. Yudisthir wanted to forget all insult of Draupadi in return of land. So, this Draupadi's revenge excuse, shown by the CVs is really getting irritating now.

It's only when Duryodhan refused the deal, that they waged war, and then remembered Draupadi's revenge.

If Duryodhan had accepted the peace-proposal, then Draupadi's "revenge" would have gone down the drains, and all those people who caused her insult would have lived on happy ever after. so, it's not Draupadi urge for revenge, but the Pandavas' urge to get back their land that caused the war.

This is my opinion.

Originally posted by: KHUSHI-99

Yes Yudhishthir sent the peace deal...moreover it was nothing like Krishna confirming that Dury would not accept it...A war for the throne has been turned in a 360 degree manner to make it war for samaj ka kalyan and Draupadi or rather only Draupadi's revenge...plus what is wrong if Pandavas or Yudhishthir wanted back the throne which they thought they were the rightfull heirs and same with Dury...

There's actually nothing wrong in fighting for one's rights. So, if seen that way, the Pandavas had reasons to wage war especially after they tried to send peace proposal. However, i just hate the way, the real motive of the Pandavas are camouflaged everywhere, n the whole blame is shifted on Draupadi. Being a fan of Draupadi it really pinches me to see how every rendition of Mahabharat tries to put it all on the shoulders of Draupadi...as if the war took place just bcoz she wantrd it. And as if,everything depended on wat she wanted, which is not true.

you know what, duryodhan was the main reason for the war.