Dharamraj or Adharamraj yudhisthira

Page

Next Last

Pamalo

@Pamalo

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

hai my dears i saw a post saying all righteous men wronged a woman in which it was said all the men in MB let VH happen to paanchali all were wrong tht day i completely agree with that but i have one question plz i know many would not like my question but still i'm putting this whom do you think was the root cause for paanchali's VH that day was it not yudhisthira? i know shakuni did namy *chals* & all but shouldn't yudhi have stopped playing the game wen they said to stake his brothers no he didnot he staked all of them.His brothers atleast should have stopped dushasan but no they wer following their brother & his so called dharam.Everyone were wrong in that sabha starting from Bheeshma Drona Pandavas Karna Duryodhan Shakuni but i think most of all its Yudhisthira he was not Dharmaraj that day but definitely Adharamraj.Everyone were taking care of their personal dharam which led to the biggest ADHARAM in the whole epic.

sorry if i have offended anyone this is just my perspective mahabharat is very vast & i know many have their own views im not saying anything is wrong this is just one view that's all.plz do comment & share ur views bt no bashing 😃.

yours,

Anya.

Quote

Frequent Posters

Justitia

@Justitia

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

As per the epic, Yudi's gambling addiction is what made him stake - and this point has been made time and again on the forum.

Yudi was NOT compelled by his dharma in any way.

And yes, he did feel guilty for his actions.

And regarding his bros, Yudi's redeeming moment was the yaksha prashna where he REVIVED his dead bros.

And I repeat - Krishna was on the Pandava side, and Yudi became king of HP after the war.

So make of that what you will...

Will you now question Krishna for being pro-Pandava and all?

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Pamalo

@Pamalo

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: -Shani-
As per the epic, Yudi's gambling addiction is what made him stake - and this point has been made time and again on the forum.

Yudi was NOT compelled by his dharma in any way.

And yes, he did feel guilty for his actions.

And regarding his bros, Yudi's redeeming moment was the yaksha prashna where he REVIVED his dead bros.

And I repeat - Krishna was on the Pandava side, and Yudi became king of HP after the war.

So make of that what you will...

Will you now question Krishna for being pro-Pandava and all?

yes i agree tht yudhi redeemed himself Krishna was on their side & all wat i'm asking is did he have the right to stake any of his bros ok leave them they are his bros so can be justified bt why did he stake paanchali tht was wrong i dont care if krishna was on their side or not bt yudhi did wrong tht day period.

sorry i dont want to offend or hurt you bt i dont like yudhi's actions tht day.

Quote

naq5

@naq5

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

krishna was on their side coz thy repented & realised their mistake. that is y while the kauravas did not.

Quote

Pamalo

@Pamalo

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: naq5
krishna was on their side coz thy repented & realised their mistake. that is y while the kauravas did not.

yes im not saying they didnt realise their mistake im saying they did mistake

Quote

Angeala

@angeala95

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

Yes yudi did a mistake! He was wrong! He repented it and did all he could to free himself frm that guilt!!
A person is nt defined by his mistakes, he is defined how he accpets his faults and tries to make up for them!!
Same goes for all the pandavas!!
But apart frm them, no one in that sabha tried to right a wrong!!

Quote

FlauntPesimism

@FlauntPessimism

Viewbie

+ 10

Posted: 11 years ago

I agree with you. No doubt that Pandavas repented that they couldnt support Draupadi but never did Yudi personally apologize Draupadi for staking her. All these brothers did was taking an oath to humiliated their beloved.

If that is the case whom do you think humiliated her the most? One who staked her knowing the nature of his opponent (Dont tell that Yudi had not assumed the fate of Draupadi if he lost before staking her. Dont tell me that he thought that after winning, Dury will respectfully ask her to stay as she always was. Come on Dury had already humiliated the Pandavas in the worst possible way.) So if Yudii staked her he was the first one to humiliate her. What Kauravas and Karna did was very wrong but I still find it was Yudi who was at a much greater wrong

As far as Lord Krishna is concerned, he supported Pandavas in the Mahabharat war, not during the Draupadi ficasso. Mahabharat was a war for their lost land and in no case for lost dignity (or Pandavas would have never agreed for IP to avoid the war). Krishna Bhagwan was in their side because He knew that the throne belongs to Yudi and not because he was at a lesser wrong during VH episode. What do you mean to say that had Dury apologised to Draupadi for his sin, Krishna Bhagwan would have favoured him at Kurukshetra??

And my question is if that day Lord had not come for Draupadi's rescue, what good would have Pandavas apologies done. At last I can think of a proverb -- "It is easier to get an apology than a permission"

Quote

FlauntPesimism

@FlauntPessimism

Viewbie

+ 10

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: angeala95
Yes yudi did a mistake! He was wrong! He repented it and did all he could to free himself frm that guilt!!
A person is nt defined by his mistakes, he is defined how he accpets his faults and tries to make up for them!!
Same goes for all the pandavas!!
But apart frm them, no one in that sabha tried to right a wrong!!

I think you dont know but there was a person at the Sabha who strongly condemned the ill act and tried his level best to stop it. And can you guess who he was?? His name was Vikarana, a son of Dhritrashta and Gandhaari and a brother of Duryodhan (in short a Kaurav) He was also killed by Bheem during Mahabharat (like his 99 brothers). I think if the case was only of Draupadi's revenge atleast his life should have been spared. (I mean if everyone did a mistake why wasnt Vidur punished?)

And sorry to say apologies are of mistakes, not for crimes. What Yudi did was a crime and not a mistake

Quote

Pamalo

@Pamalo

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

im not telling the whole of his character is wrong just tht day he was wrong & i noe he repented it 😊

Quote

Pamalo

@Pamalo

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#10

Originally posted by: shipreeta
I agree with you. No doubt that Pandavas repented that they couldnt support Draupadi but never did Yudi personally apologize Draupadi for staking her. All these brothers did was taking an oath to humiliated their beloved.

If that is the case whom do you think humiliated her the most? One who staked her knowing the nature of his opponent (Dont tell that Yudi had not assumed the fate of Draupadi if he lost before staking her. Dont tell me that he thought that after winning, Dury will respectfully ask her to stay as she always was. Come on Dury had already humiliated the Pandavas in the worst possible way.) So if Yudii staked her he was the first one to humiliate her. What Kauravas and Karna did was very wrong but I still find it was Yudi who was at a much greater wrong

As far as Lord Krishna is concerned, he supported Pandavas in the Mahabharat war, not during the Draupadi ficasso. Mahabharat was a war for their lost land and in no case for lost dignity (or Pandavas would have never agreed for IP to avoid the war). Krishna Bhagwan was in their side because He knew that the throne belongs to Yudi and not because he was at a lesser wrong during VH episode. What do you mean to say that had Dury apologised to Draupadi for his sin, Krishna Bhagwan would have favoured him at Kurukshetra??

And my question is if that day Lord had not come for Draupadi's rescue, what good would have Pandavas apologies done. At last I can think of a proverb -- "It is easier to get an apology than a permission"

oh thank u finally someone is agreeing with me tht yudhi was wrong tht day i'm not saying his whole character is bad just tht he made a horrible sin tht day by staking drau maybe he repented later bt wat use it wud've been if VH had really happened & i agree with ur proverb too dear.

Quote

1 2 3 4

Dharamraj or Adharamraj yudhisthira

Related Topics

Explore Topics