Originally posted by: ..BlessedOne..
Krishna breaking his vow, dat was meant for Bhishm too, so it cant be taken as example. Breaking vow for two devotees nd using that type of language for non-devotee, there's a difference.
Him praising Karna's warrior skills is contradictory due to Satyaki statement bt him counting Karna's sins isn't contradictory. Krishna was delighted after his death nd never praised him after dat.
Nd Karna never ever defeated Arjuna. He was highly jealous nd obsessed wid him.
it does not hold anything when said that Krishna infuriated Arjuna by his dialogues.
Krishna said those to that Arjuna would anger up. And secondly, the citation which was provided ine EDT does not say anything about Krisha breaking his vow for Bhishma, it only says that Krishna is paying respect to him by personally rushing to kill him. This can be further argued in EDT or D&D thread.
You are contradicting yourself mate, first you said that - Krishna's word is the ultimate thing, and now when his words were in Karna's court, 'contradiction' is seeming to occur from your side.
Well, in Kurekshetra - some highly powerful people never left his side did they?, they protected him from Karna at all times, first the Nagastra, secondly saving his chariot from exploding, thirdly - using illusive powers to prevent Karna from killing Arjuna.
Edited by TheWatcher - 11 years ago