Mahabharat Episode Discussion Thread #12 - Page 33

Originally posted by: -Shruti

Main Duryodhana hoon.

^ I didn't get it. Duryodhana was Kali, a demon. How Narayana can say that he's Duryodhana? Someone enlighten me please.

Originally posted by: -Shruti

Main Duryodhana hoon.

^ I didn't get it. Duryodhana was Kali, a demon. How Narayana can say that he's Duryodhana? Someone enlighten me please.

Originally posted by: TheWatcher

So, its like we believe one book and we can change change the book because it supports our base.

Changing the book for proving one point is not right. Bhagvatam is sure reliable but this part is from Mahabharata and KMG has to be used. I can give citations which call Karna a big fish while Arjuna was only a small fish - but would it be right against a debate on Karna vs Arjuna?, it wont be. The same reason is applied to this point too.

When did I say Bhishma took a 2nd vow?, he was quite during the Vastraharan because he was bound by his vow. ( Please correct me If I am wrong on this one )

It was an absolutely amazing episode today,everybody is discussing that.Why are u so angry .cant u put aside these citation arguments once

Originally posted by: -Shruti

Main Duryodhana hoon.

^ I didn't get it. Duryodhana was Kali, a demon. How Narayana can say that he's Duryodhana? Someone enlighten me please.

i belive they ment to say that paramatma(krishna) is also the evil duryodhana while simalteniously being the good paarth, waise bhi un dono ki jeevatma kaa srot toh ek hi hain.

Originally posted by: -Shruti

Main Duryodhana hoon.

^ I didn't get it. Duryodhana was Kali, a demon. How Narayana can say that he's Duryodhana? Someone enlighten me please.

In short understand that he is the supreme being, he is Kali - because Kali too is an ansh of Parmatma. Everyone, whether he is a demon or an angel, is a part/ansh of Parmatma.

Secondly, don't go by literal sense of SP, there were dialogues posted by someone where Krishna was stating his position. Here is it -

" Of Adityas iam Vishnu, Of Rudras iam Sankara, Of Devas iam Indra, Of Punishers iam Yama, Of Weapons iam Vajra, Of Celestial Stars iam Moon, Of Bright Radiannt Bodies iam Sun, Of Pandavas iam Arjuna, Of Water Bodies iam Oceans, Of Mountains iam Himalayas, Of Rivers iam Ganges, Of Cows iam Kamadenu, Of Serpents iam Vasuku, Of 5 Senses iam Mind, Of Humans iam Soul, Of Devastaters iam Devastating Agents, Of Cheaters iam Gambling, Of Trees iam Banyan, Of Devarishis iam Narad muni, Of Panchabhootas iam Fire, Of Captains iam Karthikeya, Of Justice iam Harmony "

The people mentioned above are supreme in their genre and hence Krishna is saying he is the supreme one.

yes, he is EVERYTHING, yet he is NOTHING.

Originally posted by: pooja123ar

It was an absolutely amazing episode today,everybody is discussing that.Why are u so angry .cant u put aside these citation arguments once

Don't worry this topic is not related to todays episode, it is an another argument which has been going on for a few days. My bad I should have quoted the person.

Originally posted by: TheWatcher

In short understand that he is the supreme being, he is Kali - because Kali too is an ansh of Parmatma. Everyone, whether he is a demon or an angel, is a part/ansh of Parmatma.

Secondly, don't go by literal sense of SP, there were dialogues posted by someone where Krishna was stating his position. Here is it -

" Of Adityas iam Vishnu, Of Rudras iam Sankara, Of Devas iam Indra, Of Punishers iam Yama, Of Weapons iam Vajra, Of Celestial Stars iam Moon, Of Bright Radiannt Bodies iam Sun, Of Pandavas iam Arjuna, Of Water Bodies iam Oceans, Of Mountains iam Himalayas, Of Rivers iam Ganges, Of Cows iam Kamadenu, Of Serpents iam Vasuku, Of 5 Senses iam Mind, Of Humans iam Soul, Of Devastaters iam Devastating Agents, Of Cheaters iam Gambling, Of Trees iam Banyan, Of Devarishis iam Narad muni, Of Panchabhootas iam Fire, Of Captains iam Karthikeya, Of Justice iam Harmony "

The people mentioned above are supreme in their genre and hence Krishna is saying he is the supreme one.