Originally posted by: -Shani-
When Krishna met Arjuna for the first time in ⭐️B, Krishna did indeed tell Subhi,"Tum to meri Yogmaya ho, Subhadre..." Maybe, the viewers didn't pay attention back then...
Subhadra IS worshipped as a Goddess at the Jagannatha Temple in Puri (in case you didn't know).
Or, maybe the characterization of ⭐️Subhi makes it difficult for some people to believe that Subhadra is indeed an incarnation of the Divine. Of course, Draupadi is "divine" as well.
Point I'm trying to make is - If Draupadi can be "divine", why not Subhadra?
Regarding Draupadi's characterization, I have been complaining about it ever since the Pandavas stepped foot into Khandavaprastha. If you recall, THAT was when ⭐️Draupadi actually told the Pandavas that a warrior should be "scared" of fighting war since war causes loss of innocent lives. Yes, she actually said that!!
And despite fighting those snakes with a sword, she promptly turned on the waterworks when she saw the praja lying flat after the Takshak snake attack.
So, what exactly has changed since then?
And yes, this Krishna leela gyaan seems to be conveying roughly the same basic message as the Gita. And Arjuna is also listening to this Krishna leela gyaan. So, will Arjuna have any reason left to not fight in Kurukshetra?
And even if Arjuna does not want to fight, THIS same Krishna leela gyaan can be repeated once more in Kurukshetra. In such a situation, why give special emphasis on "aatma amar hai", karma, yoga, etc., if Krishna leela gyaan itself can do the job?