{|VIJAYADHARI Karna: AHAM Sharma's AT#9|}

First Previous

Page

119

Next Last

Poll

What was Karna's point of no return as far as his enmity w/ the Pandav

Frequent Posters

582445

Hibernated

Posted: 11 years ago

#91

Originally posted by: ...Diala...
I know we have many reasons to hate Kunti.. but I cant agree that she wanted the baby to die.. she did have the basic sympathy on baby Karna that any common living being deserves.. This sounds too harsh for me..

Diala I know its difficult to imagine so .. but think practically being a princess she cud just gave the child for adoption .. she herself was an adopted daughter of Kuntibhoj n we all know every royal family used to have der little-BIG secrets .. de don't need to be scared of it. See how Satyavati was all open with her relationship with Vyasa n nobody in kuru vansh ever asked her a question about it. This was because society then wasn't harsh on illegitimate child or their mother. Again if she has not enough courage she has a many sakhi, Dashi n neighbor kings who wud have happily accepted a son from Sun without revealing her secret .. floating a newborn in high current sticking the basket with wax!!?? I don't think it was needed at all

Quote

riti4u

@riti4u

Stunner

+ 7

Posted: 11 years ago

#92

i read in another thread here that Sahedev knew about past world history too apart from events in future... is that true..? if that was case , is there chance of him knowing already that karna was their brother..😕

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

panchaali

@panchaali

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#93

Originally posted by: riti4u
i read in another thread here that Sahedev knew about past world history too apart from events in future... is that true..? if that was case , is there chance of him knowing already that karna was their brother..😕

But Sahadev even though foresee incidents he could not reveal it to anyone..

Quote

riti4u

@riti4u

Stunner

+ 7

Posted: 11 years ago

#94

Originally posted by: panchaali

But Sahadev even though foresee incidents he could not reveal it to anyone..

hmm..yeah i read that part also.. though Vyas doesnt mention this i think but still knowing that he is their elder brother... his reaction to karna wud have been always different from other pandavas who didnt knw it at all..

Quote

panchaali

@panchaali

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#95

I don't know how he reacted after finding out Karna his elder brother...

As the youngest Pandav and his twin brother is kind of guest characters in Mahabharat...

Edited by panchaali - 11 years ago

Quote

Diala D

@...Diala...

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#96

I dont think Sahadev theories are true.. anyone who knows would do something about the upcoming dangers.. which he dint know.. he was a normal guy I would say...

Quote

Diala D

@...Diala...

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#97

Originally posted by: SayaneeH.Lecter

Diala I know its difficult to imagine so .. but think practically being a princess she cud just gave the child for adoption .. she herself was an adopted daughter of Kuntibhoj n we all know every royal family used to have der little-BIG secrets .. de don't need to be scared of it. See how Satyavati was all open with her relationship with Vyasa n nobody in kuru vansh ever asked her a question about it. This was because society then wasn't harsh on illegitimate child or their mother. Again if she has not enough courage she has a many sakhi, Dashi n neighbor kings who wud have happily accepted a son from Sun without revealing her secret .. floating a newborn in high current sticking the basket with wax!!?? I don't think it was needed at all

Sayanee.. am not going into the other parts of the story or other options she had.. but it is clear that she did want the child to reach the hands of a better mother.. and what is this problem with wax? I dont think she sealed the basket with wax.. Will check that..

Kunti has enough sins to her account.. this one I wont add..

Quote

Rumjhum Laha

@Patrarekha

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#98

but kunti did sin floating karna

Quote

Diala D

@...Diala...

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#99

Floating was unsafe I do agree.. but it was not intended to get the child killed.. this is not my assumption as a woman or human being.. this is what is there in the book.. had it not been there I would have joined you all in loathing her for this..

Edited by ...Diala... - 11 years ago