The Warped Sense Of Dharma and The Man Who Rose Above It

Medha.S thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#1

The only real man that day was Krishna, and he wasn't even present there.

This was appallingly depressing and I will stab anyone who dares to come too close to touch even a strand of my hair.šŸ˜†

Everyone in the dice hall, and there thousands of Kings present mind you, all of these great learned men were busy either:

Protecting and following their false sense of Dharma and duties.

OR

Being entertained and laughing at the woman being dragged by her hair and being perverted lustful imbeciles

OR

Being spiteful and satisfied that they were finally getting their revenge and now can happily say 'Tit for Tat, Lady" You laughed at me so I laughed at you, you offended my honor so i destroyed yours.

Yudhishtira lost her, his everything, all the hard work their brothers did to build a city just for him to rule, he even lost those brothers. His gambling addiction paid off, every bad thing you do will come to hurt you one day.

He let his Empress and his wife down; He let those brothers who gave him the status of their Father down. He let himself down.

And he knew it. Seeing his wife verbally and physically abused while he was some measly slave was his punishment.

But not even in his worst nightmare he would have anticipated that these men would stoop so low as to assault her and humiliate her in public, because he is that person who just can't accept that everyone cannot be goody and dharmik.

He was too good for his own good because even after all that, when it came time to either leave Duryodhna or free him from the Gandharvas, he chose to help Duryodhna like the foolish person he was.

And Draupadi was a Kuru woman, a royal bride, a kuru daughter-in-law. A woman doesn't just marry the man but adopts the whole family. Why only the Husbands? Every man of the Kuru dynasty was accountable for her. They all were her guardians. Women of the family are to be protected by the Men.

They all were obliged to protect and defend her honour. But no!

As Krishna said, and this is so significant, Customs and workings of a society have essence of Dharma in them but not all the customs are Dharma.You cannot just say I have to follow these men -made customs of the society because it is dharma.

This is just a warped sense of Dharma.

When Draupadi asks Bhishma that why won't he do anything? Well, he says that she has been won by Duryodhna so..

He could see that he doesn't have any right to meddle because he was too busy seeing everything from the perspective of Duryodhnas ownership and rights.

He didnt even think of just forgetting his duties towards his King and look at it from the viewpoint of a woman standing bruised and almost naked in front of him asking that why wont he help her when he accepted her as a daughter and blessed her, extending his protection to her.

Now that when it truly mattered, his duties towards his Kingdom are his first priority and a woman's honor comes way later. And he feels angered and disturbed but he wont go against his King and the King's sons.

Even if Pandavas had lost their freedom and their weapons, it was not the case for all those other mighty Kings sitting there laughing and leering at Draupadi. Vidura spoke and tried to defend her, Vikarna tried to stop the assaults only to be shot down by Karna as being too young and childish to understand these BIG MANLY MATTERS.

Even if Karna didn't knew that Draupadi was her sister- in- law, he knew well enough that she was a daughter-in-law of these great Kuru men, Dhritrashtra and Bhishma. She belonged to the family that has given him so much.

And moreover she was 'Per-Istri', someone else's wife. He was probably drowning in his jealousy towards her husband and whatever petty hate he had towards her to call her stuff and then ask that she be stripped in front of her Father-In-laws.

And then he told her that 'Lady you have a loving soul, You don't have husbands now, so become a slave-Woman for the Kauravas. "Choose" anyone for your Lord."

There was never hope for Duryodhna and Dushasana and all their brothers, but you would think that they would have enough shame and adequate of princes of such a celebrated kingdom, that they wouldn't drag a family matter in a public court and get down to insulting their sister-in-law(even if they won't accept it for reasons you can imagine🤢) verbally and physically!

Alas, no such luck!

Dhritrashtra, the King of the court, sitting in his royal chair, probably assuring himself that 'Oh I am Blind, It is not like i can see my daughter-in-law being stripped"

He was a vindictive insecure man himself that is why he sat quietly, being 'BLIND' when his sons were cheating the sons of his younger brother, making them slaves and insulting them.

And suddenly, when Draupadi had enough and started cursing all the Kaurava wives widows and all their children orphans, Dhritrashtra childless and the large HP castle all empty and bare, instead of Dhritrashtras son laughing all around and their children shrieking and playing in the halls, only Women crying and lamenting the loss of their sons and husbands.

THAT is when he remembers that he has a voice and he can do something to stop all his daughter-in-laws from becoming widows.šŸ˜†

Krishna, only Krishna who was above it all, he was not tied down by the 'Reeti-Reevaz' of this society, the only one who saw everything from Draupadis standpoint

He was the only one who put a woman's honor above any other Dharma, Vows and Duties. He was able to put everything aside and just concentrate on the woman standing in the court being stripped naked and verbally insulted while everyone just laughed.

So really, Krishna was the only man that day. Others were dishonorable excuse of Men.

Created

Last reply

Replies

23

Views

3.5k

Users

19

Likes

148

Frequent Posters

Sukanya_Datta thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#2
Gal, you are back with a bang (and some more..šŸ˜‰)...
Missed you and your sarcasm-laden posts a lot.. šŸ¤—

Loved your post and agree with it whole-heatedly.. šŸ˜›
Edited by Sukanya_Datta - 11 years ago
--Royal-- thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#3
Very nice post yr šŸ‘
Edited by -abhi-pundir- - 11 years ago
Regina_Lupa thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#4
Medha thank you for such an awesome post!!!

Could feel your heat dear!!!! Wow
Justitia thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#5
šŸ‘ šŸ‘ šŸ‘
Medha - brilliant post.

But, just a question - Don't slaves have a duty to protect their wife too if she needs them? Or is it all too convenient for a slave to say "I am subservient to my swami, therefore, I am completely helpless in this particular situation"? In other words, why didn't the Pandavas put their pati dharma ahead of everything else?

If it was someone like Kunti who was being treated like this, surely, the Pandavas would've protested against this appalling treatment of their beloved mata...
RosChel.Lobster thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#6
So true he was the only man that day who saved Draupadi's honour even though he was not physically present there unlike the men who were mum in the court!
Apt post medha šŸ‘šŸ¼
starsshinex thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#7
Fabulous post! :) Totally agree with you! :D
Medha.S thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: shani88

šŸ‘ šŸ‘ šŸ‘

Medha - brilliant post.

But, just a question - Don't slaves have a duty to protect their wife too if she needs them? Or is it all too convenient for a slave to say "I am subservient to my swami, therefore, I am completely helpless in this particular situation"? In other words, why didn't the Pandavas put their pati dharma ahead of everything else?

If it was someone like Kunti who was being treated like this, surely, the Pandavas would've protested against this appalling treatment of their beloved mata...


Pandavas lost their freedom, their weapons, themselves. Have you noticed that slaves were treated as commodities. Every king was gifting and receiving thousands and thousands of Human slaves right along with Horses, Camels, Elephants. That just shows what status slaves had in the society.

The slave thing is disturbing for me, personally. But everyone from HP folks to Pandavas to Krishna were gifting and receiving human slaves like it sending thousands of humans to serve someone from one place to another and so on was everyday thing. It probably was.
Female slaves separately were given too, all handsome and with big eyes and this type of body blah blah šŸ¤”Ewww.🤢

So whoever their masters gifted them to, the slaves accepted them as their master.So did the slaves had wives and husbands.

All these slave women who will probably be serving their masters in EVERY WAY possible (disturbing, disturbing), do they really have husbands back home waiting for them? When these woman will probably be gifted and received from one King to another?

And for a moment consider the male slaves had wives back home, waiting for them. Had Pandavas been slaves and Draupadi had ran off to live with her father. What do you think? She would still be considered married to men who are slaves? Maybe. Maybe not.

But here Pandavas are slaves and even Bhishma agrees that Draupadi belongs to Duryodhna as a slave woman, Bond-Woman since he did won her fairly.

Firstly slaves don't have freedom, and then their wife herself is not just some woman but a slave herself.

All these men who had power and status left in society, they all just sat and watched, what were 5 slaves going to do? They could have fought with bare hands but only Bhima would have been able to take them to some extent.
If all the soldiers and Kauravas with all their King friends had ganged up on the five brothers, would they to play fair and leave their own weapons and start wrestling with the five of them? How many soldiers would be in a public court, there were thousands of kings.

Also now that Yudhishtira was a mere slave, his status was even lower than that random soldier standing guard in that corner.
And Kunti could have staked her own sons but could Yudhishtira have staked his mother as possession. Not Likely. The fact that Draupadi was now a slave herself who Yudhishtira probably thought has been won fairly probably made him feel even more helpless. Telling you, it was all just a false sense of Dharma they had.


And Krishna, when he came to meet he Pandavas, never blamed them. He included them all in the Victimised Group.
He was angered and vicious, even then he did not blame the Pandavas.
Krishna said that he will murder Duryodhna and Karna.😈

And everytime after that when he mentioned the game, he bluntly blamed Dhritrashtra for being BLIND and a bad king. Blamed Dusahsan, Karna and Duryodhna.
Blamed Bhishma and Dhritrashtra for being Kuru men and not doing anything because they all were "IMBECILES".
You know it is serious business when Krishna calls his elders THAT. And that too right in front of Sanjaya who will go to Dhritrashtra and tell him everything.

Krishna fears no Blind Bad King.





mythili2 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#9
medha awesome post ā­ļø agree with u completely.. nothing was more important than protecting drupadis honour bt all f the so called elders of kuru clan kept quite 🤢 n i consider drithrastra to be more responsible than anyone else 😔 it was only krishna who helped her ..
Medha.S thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: mythili2

medha awesome post ā­ļø agree with u completely.. nothing was more important than protecting drupadis honour bt all f the so called elders of kuru clan kept quite 🤢 n i consider drithrastra to be more responsible than anyone else 😔 it was only krishna who helped her ..


He symbolises deliberate and selective blindness like no ones buisness really.
He was even involved in the Lac House theory, what do you expect.
But that was done privately, this became a public spectacle and he only spoke when it the time when his Sons mangled and bloody future was being written by Draupadi with her anger and devastation on the page of time.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".