Posted:
Me too agree GU shdnt be negative or villain for d show now becos to be a villain u need strong acting skills n screen presence particulary in front of DVD! GU has a long way to go in acting dept n he has zero screen presence. no offence to d actor as it is his second fiction show only. bt if he is showed in a poor light, his future chances wd be affected.
i remember a parallel. i dont know how many knwo this. in Lamhe, for older sridevi one model guy ws the pair. he looked good n ws ok in acting. bt whn he spoke he had such a weak voice. when he called out 'palloo', i remember d whole theatre audience laughed out aloud. poor guy left d film world forever. he remained as a model co-ordinator. GU shdnt end up like that.
he migh thave his strengths, cvs shd have worked on it instead make him look like a joker in some scenes. less closeups wd also be better for him. today whn they showed him removign somehting from his inside shirt, it ws done so badly it turned out to be yucky. again no fault of GU, ppl shd have told him na. why didnt they?
so i too agree he shdnt be turned negative for being a villain is not easy. u need strong acting skills and good screen presence for it. GU needs more experinece for making a good villain. the way he looks at pam, evn LW today ws misleading! director shd have taken more care becos GU is not that experienced. he needs more help!
Book Talk
Anupamaa
