WHY ARENT POPULAR ACTORS AGREEING TO MB .... - Page 7

Originally posted by: JOHNdaCENA

Heard this many times but i remember the shows name was first kathputli . then shikhar ... then madhubala ... and vds name was speculated in 2 months after pkyek ended ... they rejected many popular ksg .. kw .. rajat ... abhinav shukla...

Originally posted by: leelaa9

Agreed, Neha. Male leads are shown getting violently adverse in their reactions for far less reason. Here, first RK was shown as idiot enough to waste money on producing a non-RK-centric film which was totally useless to secure his stardom and win his challenge that he could produce a hit RK-centric film not produced by any other producer.
Everything - RK's money, Madhu's supported director and that director's story - were all sure weeks in advance as going to benefit only the career of the then undecided heroine.
They gave RK grandiose dialogue that the heroine and story wouldn't matter, but it was clear nonsense.
His money for a story focussing on the heroine - no male star does that.
Maximum is a cameo, not a secondary role in 60% of the film and no role for the remaining 40% of the film.
Then the RK who would never tolerate being disrespected now quietly and for reason accepted being insulted by a director dependent on RK for the film, and it was a film which was clearly going to benefit career of not RK but only the director and the heroine.
Then RK's wife slapped him for real because the director wanted the scene to look real. Madhu not only didn't refuse, RK just pretended to be angry but actually was amused.
So he magically lost not only his brains to make the non-RK-centric film possible at his own expense, but also lost his ego until it was convenient for that ego to reappear.
Tracks of female lead being tortured and humiliated can continue for months without major loss of viewership. Viewership may or not may not increase, but there is no worry that millions of the mass-audience will change the channel for such scenes.
But if male lead is treated even occasionally disrespectfully, they have to limit the scenes to a wrap within weeks with the triumph of the male lead.
Here they showed him increasingly majboor and humiliated for a film that was totally guaranteed to showcase only his wife.
Mass-audience is mostly not fandoms, and has the unfortunate habit consistent over more than a decade that they if they think something is going to result against their preference, they won't watch regularly to see excuses until the end on the offchance that they are guessing wrong. They just skip episodes for days or weeks, resulting in track getting modified on weekly basis to regain their interest. There is no public outcry against a track, simply the channel getting switched - and it's enough to get the track first modified and then closed.
Pabho nivaarans would not make anyone who wanted to watch heroine track abandon the series. And majority-audience has never watched any track of female lead in a glamour career except as an occassional mention alongside other tracks which are more focussed on.
Pabho track was presumably supposed to draw majority-audience to get adequate viewership for the heroine-track. But since all of Madhu's sufferings and RK's sufferings were all predictably sure to result in a film that would be Madhu's success and RK's meaningless suffering in the process, there was assurance that the 'cruel saas' was not not going to work as a sympathy gambit that would get mass-audiecne to tune in enough millions of viewership to watch the heroine-track alongside.
Miscarriage track always works for separation because it is built on misunderstanding. Wife misunderstands that husband doesn't want the child. Husband misunderstands that wife was careless about the pregnancy.
Here there was no scope for misunderstanding. Husband definitely didn't want the child - he asked wife to have abortion. Wife definitely was careless about the pregnancy - she insisted on doing a fire-stunt. The dratted track showcased to the mass-audience that husband and wife both prioritized the film over the unborn child. It left nonexistent expectation of adequate viewership if they were to separate after miscarriage and the wife were to yet again benefit in stardom career - first unintentionally from her husband's majbooris, then unintentionally from her bereavement as a mother.
If the CVs want to know a track's success, they should tell the sponsors exactly what they intend to show from all angles in the coming track, not just one of the angles. Then they will have a clear idea how much financial backing they can expect.
CVs/channel can show any track they want for as long as they want as grandly as they want, but only if they are willing to themselves bear the financial brunt of it.
This is a situation where poor viewership is also many millions of people. Viewership being enough millions or not enough millions results in a track being continued or closed - unless the CVs/channel are willing to spend their own money.
If sponsors think there's even a chance of adequate viewership, they will back a track reasonably generously. So if they refuse to back a track beyond minimum or at all, it's an almost certainty for the CVs/channel that if they spend their own money without sponsors backing, they will be somewhat sure to be financially at a loss.
Sponsors have been with the channels since the get-go, and far more so after globalization and satellite TV started. They have watched each channel start, over 20+ years of serials and programmes, and dozens of track in every variation succeed or fail, and may be expected to have a reasonable comprehension of how many millions of viewership they may expect in what context.
And the expenses and income of the channels, production houses, crews, supporting actors and lead actors are all for the most part backed by the sponsors.
It is a huge amount of money on a daily basis, and is made worthwhile by there being enough millions of viewers to make that many a worthwhile investment.
Out of the many millions of people watching an episode, some may go and buy the products advertised in the little ad-slots in between. And that 'some' is enough millions of people to make the sponsors money on each serial commensurate or noncommensurate. Less millions of people watching is less people buying. Less profit as that endgame means less budget worth backing for a serial if enough millions of people don't watch the episode without changing the channel.

u said it all leela cant agree wid u more
The cvs need to have shown logic n reality in their tracks wen basically they were showing bollywood track audience might be unaware of bollywood life but they're not fools to not understand that how a male superstar is being ruined to get the undecided heroine into spotlight n all tracks after heroine track mercilessly butuchured rk cvs can forget that rk wanted three kids wen he was faking love button audience didn't forgot that n wen rk asked for abortion stating his helplessness it was all making him emotionally n physically weak which was not the rk audience loved they liked the old cunning manupulative calculative n caring n loving at the same time but cvs completely forgot his characterstics to suit their own needs in order to always gain sympathy for madhu they butuchured rk n thats wat the main reason for their low trps audience knew the intelligent n sharp rk who planned the revenge all alone but after april he was nowhere even after falling in love they cld have maintained his intelligence but no they must have decided long back that they will kill his character at end so this continuous butuchuring resulting his brutal end n now result is infront of us ppl dnt hate rk but they hate ph n that is the reason no established actor wants to come here if not vd other person wld have left the show if his character wld have got this much butuchuring by its own cvs

Originally posted by: NehaVdian

i dnt agree wid u over here heroine track was bought at the cost of rks stardom first he was banned , then he was made to do heroine centric movie which no superstar wld agree to do his comeback , thirdly he was paralysed to make heroine centric film audience is not fool to accept that a man getting ruined bcoz ph wants hs downfall to make his wife a superstar if the track had got logic then it wld have been acceptable but it was nowhere thats the reason of heroine tracks failure

Originally posted by: Looteri_Dulhan

Soul of the show has left so why would anybody risk their career by associating with 'Zinda lash' MB?😆

true and cvs should know that another soul will never make this dead show alive

😆

Originally posted by: JOHNdaCENA

true and cvs should know that another soul will never make this dead show alive

correct 😆 after seeing such a beautiful dark love story and rishibala death mb has fulfilled its journey though 3-4 day mb was good😆 ek baar ak ko aane de phir band bajegi 🤣

1 and 2 options..

Agree it's all those reasons in the poll and as well as listed in the post too.