WHY ARENT POPULAR ACTORS AGREEING TO MB .... - Page 6

Originally posted by: mik07

Comparison is bound to happen but lets not forget that the character is AK now, not RK. AK wud surely have different personality traits. He is not RK. But, vivian as RK has set such standards that any actor will think twice before taking up the lead role. Second is the on-screen chemistry he had with drashti. Both vivian and drashti complemented each other. Their acting, screen timing were perfect. I doubt any other actor will be able to create that magic. If ST would have started a new serial with drashti wid a diff male actor, then this comparison wudn't be taking place.

I agree its Ak not RK ... BUT he is still a superstar

sree some vdians are still here to support u

Originally posted by: JOHNdaCENA

Agree but not all popular actors take home huge sum ... offlate i only know gurmeet he takes in a huge amount ... but the rest i doubt

Salaries are paid according to the popularity. Viv got a good hike after the first year.

Originally posted by: Opti

In the way they executed their earlier one film wonder senior madhubala track. Did you really get the feeling of a grand shooting going on? Or a grand movie release? Even the Ballu murder track (the sholay spoof) was more grand than that.

Second option is highly perfect at this situation koi maane ya na maane vd has set that standard that no established actor will agree to do his leftover show n all know how famous rk n vd were so its definately they dnt want to be compared n secondly st doesn't have budget to afford another popular face n lastly i think st wants to show vd n vdians that vd wasnt a star before mbeiej n st made him star so he is taking new face

second option...another reason can be they want 2 SAVE MONEY...coz well build actors will want more money ...

It Madhu Drashti show not about lead actor .lead actor will only be a second character . No actor can replace Vivian,salute the actors who give respect to RK .

Originally posted by: SVK1234

<font color="#990000" face="Comic Sans MS, Times, serif" size="2">great!!! first heroine track failed due to RK insecurity, MC and pabho drama and this time it will fail bcoz of no/ limited budget.even though i still cannot understand how can a heroine be a downfall for already established hero. no one can understand ST and his teams logic.</font>

i dnt agree wid u over here heroine track was bought at the cost of rks stardom first he was banned , then he was made to do heroine centric movie which no superstar wld agree to do his comeback , thirdly he was paralysed to make heroine centric film audience is not fool to accept that a man getting ruined bcoz ph wants hs downfall to make his wife a superstar if the track had got logic then it wld have been acceptable but it was nowhere thats the reason of heroine tracks failure

Originally posted by: NehaVdian

i dnt agree wid u over here heroine track was bought at the cost of rks stardom first he was banned , then he was made to do heroine centric movie which no superstar wld agree to do his comeback , thirdly he was paralysed to make heroine centric film audience is not fool to accept that a man getting ruined bcoz ph wants hs downfall to make his wife a superstar if the track had got logic then it wld have been acceptable but it was nowhere thats the reason of heroine tracks failure

cant agree more

Originally posted by: NehaVdian

i dnt agree wid u over here heroine track was bought at the cost of rks stardom first he was banned , then he was made to do heroine centric movie which no superstar wld agree to do his comeback , thirdly he was paralysed to make heroine centric film audience is not fool to accept that a man getting ruined bcoz ph wants hs downfall to make his wife a superstar if the track had got logic then it wld have been acceptable but it was nowhere thats the reason of heroine tracks failure

Agreed, Neha. Male leads are shown getting violently adverse in their reactions for far less reason. Here, first RK was shown as idiot enough to waste money on producing a non-RK-centric film which was totally useless to secure his stardom and win his challenge that he could produce a hit RK-centric film not produced by any other producer.
Everything - RK's money, Madhu's supported director and that director's story - were all sure weeks in advance as going to benefit only the career of the then undecided heroine.
They gave RK grandiose dialogue that the heroine and story wouldn't matter, but it was clear nonsense.
His money for a story focussing on the heroine - no male star does that.
Maximum is a cameo, not a secondary role in 60% of the film and no role for the remaining 40% of the film.
Then the RK who would never tolerate being disrespected now quietly and for reason accepted being insulted by a director dependent on RK for the film, and it was a film which was clearly going to benefit career of not RK but only the director and the heroine.
Then RK's wife slapped him for real because the director wanted the scene to look real. Madhu not only didn't refuse, RK just pretended to be angry but actually was amused.
So he magically lost not only his brains to make the non-RK-centric film possible at his own expense, but also lost his ego until it was convenient for that ego to reappear.
Tracks of female lead being tortured and humiliated can continue for months without major loss of viewership. Viewership may or not may not increase, but there is no worry that millions of the mass-audience will change the channel for such scenes.
But if male lead is treated even occasionally disrespectfully, they have to limit the scenes to a wrap within weeks with the triumph of the male lead.
Here they showed him increasingly majboor and humiliated for a film that was totally guaranteed to showcase only his wife.
Mass-audience is mostly not fandoms, and has the unfortunate habit consistent over more than a decade that they if they think something is going to result against their preference, they won't watch regularly to see excuses until the end on the offchance that they are guessing wrong. They just skip episodes for days or weeks, resulting in track getting modified on weekly basis to regain their interest. There is no public outcry against a track, simply the channel getting switched - and it's enough to get the track first modified and then closed.
Pabho nivaarans would not make anyone who wanted to watch heroine track abandon the series. And majority-audience has never watched any track of female lead in a glamour career except as an occassional mention alongside other tracks which are more focussed on.
Pabho track was presumably supposed to draw majority-audience to get adequate viewership for the heroine-track. But since all of Madhu's sufferings and RK's sufferings were all predictably sure to result in a film that would be Madhu's success and RK's meaningless suffering in the process, there was assurance that the 'cruel saas' was not not going to work as a sympathy gambit that would get mass-audiecne to tune in enough millions of viewership to watch the heroine-track alongside.
Miscarriage track always works for separation because it is built on misunderstanding. Wife misunderstands that husband doesn't want the child. Husband misunderstands that wife was careless about the pregnancy.
Here there was no scope for misunderstanding. Husband definitely didn't want the child - he asked wife to have abortion. Wife definitely was careless about the pregnancy - she insisted on doing a fire-stunt. The dratted track showcased to the mass-audience that husband and wife both prioritized the film over the unborn child. It left nonexistent expectation of adequate viewership if they were to separate after miscarriage and the wife were to yet again benefit in stardom career - first unintentionally from her husband's majbooris, then unintentionally from her bereavement as a mother.
If the CVs want to know a track's success, they should tell the sponsors exactly what they intend to show from all angles in the coming track, not just one of the angles. Then they will have a clear idea how much financial backing they can expect.
CVs/channel can show any track they want for as long as they want as grandly as they want, but only if they are willing to themselves bear the financial brunt of it.
This is a situation where poor viewership is also many millions of people. Viewership being enough millions or not enough millions results in a track being continued or closed - unless the CVs/channel are willing to spend their own money.
If sponsors think there's even a chance of adequate viewership, they will back a track reasonably generously. So if they refuse to back a track beyond minimum or at all, it's an almost certainty for the CVs/channel that if they spend their own money without sponsors backing, they will be somewhat sure to be financially at a loss.
Sponsors have been with the channels since the get-go, and far more so after globalization and satellite TV started. They have watched each channel start, over 20+ years of serials and programmes, and dozens of track in every variation succeed or fail, and may be expected to have a reasonable comprehension of how many millions of viewership they may expect in what context.
And the expenses and income of the channels, production houses, crews, supporting actors and lead actors are all for the most part backed by the sponsors.
It is a huge amount of money on a daily basis, and is made worthwhile by there being enough millions of viewers to make that many a worthwhile investment.
Out of the many millions of people watching an episode, some may go and buy the products advertised in the little ad-slots in between. And that 'some' is enough millions of people to make the sponsors money on each serial commensurate or noncommensurate. Less millions of people watching is less people buying. Less profit as that endgame means less budget worth backing for a serial if enough millions of people don't watch the episode without changing the channel.