Indian Sanskar NOT to defend a married lady? - Page 7

Originally posted by: teletubby

well krishna came as draupadi's brother...bhai too can defend as much as he wants platonically!!! par usse toh din raat madhu ke sapne aate hain!!!😳 n i guess here male intuition is sharper than female one!!madhu is clueless whil RK has sensed bhai's interst!!😆

on top of it...'agar meri biwi hoti' etc also doesnt exactly make a hubby very amenable to indian sanskar type shishtachaar!!😆

as fr bhai biwi ka shradd was more like a biwi-memory-eraser puja...lighter ke to darshan hi nahi huye phir!!

Originally posted by: Oh_No_Soaps

And Sultaan maaring dialouge that, "Auratoon par haath uthaya not in his duniya" I really cudn't digest it. Firstly when did he see RK haath uthaying on Madhu?😕. I think Sultan was referring to the scene where he stopped rk's car and pointedhis gun at rk and told rk to let go of madhu's wrist as he was hurting her. Yes THAT is called "haath uthaying"!! Not just slapping is haath uthaying! In this country the police would arrest a husband for physically restraining his wife. It is physical violence. I think it is also possible that Sultan assumes that rk hits madhu because he has seen the wrist twisting.

Yes thats what I am trying to say, He shouldn't just ASSUME things w/o knowing the fact. There's a HUGE difference b/w wrist twirling and beating somebody. I can say this to u with an example, How did Madhu react when he held her wrist forcefully? And how would u imagine Madhu would react if he beats her???😲 So yes there is a difference b/w both.

Moreover, RK twist her wrist...But Sultaan kidnapped her under gun point😕 didn't he???...( The reason might be noble ) But a wrong act doesn't count reason. Isn't forcing some-one by gun point is more of a crime than twisting wrist?

He was WRONG in doing ALL that. BUT HE WAS NOT WRONG IN DEFENDING MADHU. HE WAS CORRECT..HE DOES NOT ABUSE WOMAN SO HE TRIED TO STOP RK VERBALLY ABUSING AND HUMILIATING MADHU.
I may steal from shops, I may physically assault ppl and steal their purse. But if I don't hit old ladies on the head and steal their gold chains, then I AM NOT DOING WRONG IN STOPPING SOMEONE ELSE WHO IS HITTING OLD LADIES AND STEALING THEIR CHAINS. And stopping someone else doing it DOESN'T make all my other crimes ok! Hope you get what I am trying to point out.

I get you dear, but i think it like this,For example - A murderer asking a thief not to do chori. Sultaan has KILLED people and done worse things. And women abuse, how can u say he never?? As i mentioned above what was the kidnapping then? Isn't it worse than verbal abuse?
I AM NOT TRYING TO JUSTIFY RK please note that ( even though i am RK fan ) , he's hell wrong and did damages which r irrepairable, I feel its Madhu who should have NOT TOLERATED crap in public.
PS: I hope nobody bashes me here, i presented my view in very pleasant manner😳
You sure did hon! Thx! 😊 Anyone bashing your comment would have me responding and most ppl don't like me responding!!
Aww ur soo sweet.Good to see at least healthy discussions can still happen in a forum like this😳

Originally posted by: Oh_No_Soaps

So is it an Indian value, sanskar, tradition, moral, ethic...call it what you will, not to defend an Indian woman if it is her husband who is abusing her?

Am asking genuinely - so many here saying that what rk did is understandable since what sultan did was VERY VERY wrong...defending madhu against her husband!!

Ummm wasn't Dhraupadi a married lady? Heck she had FIVE husbands! Didn't Krishna come to her aid when she was being humiliated? And YES her 5 husbands were indirectly responsible AS WELL for what dushaasan was doing. They should not have treated her like PROPERTY in a game of dice.

Why did Vishnu take avatar as Krishna..oh yes!! To play with the gopis so that tellywood and bollywood can make nice romantic scenes!! Gita Gyaan and Vishnu bhagwan taking avatar to SHOW PPL HOW TO LIVE. What VALUES to have , gaya bhaad mein.

Waise hona hi tha...arrey kaun Gita padhta hai har roz? We all take our instructions from daily TV soaps!! No no we don't...WE ALL KNOW ITS NOT REAL!! RIGHT??? OUR POV IS NOT INFLUENCED BY TV RIGHT?

Indian society in India has correct value in this regard? DO NOT defend a married woman from husband abuse. Its between husband and wife. Krishna...you are everywhere and know everything since you are God. So Im sure you have heard me. Next avatar dhyaan rahe!!!

ps..Those of you who might jump on the bandwagon of me bashing Indian values..NO I am not. I am questioning ONE, CURRENT and COMMON new value tradition of a lot of Indians. Have said nothing about Indian culture or tradition in general. So pls stick to topic if you post.

Originally posted by: Escape.My.Love.

Don't even go on Krishnaa. He was a sick political manipulator who had turned brothers against brothers despite knowing everything which paandvas themselves didn't know! he is the reason why karna was humiliated so much in draupadi's husband conquest thing! krishnaa had provoked her to defend her brother despite her brother humiliating karnaa of being a chariot driver's son.krishnaa knew what was in Draupadi's heart and he still provoked her against karna for the sake of her brother.she wanted the love she deep down inside had for karna without her permission to be fulfilled from arjun as the image of arjun appealed her with all the battle scars on his forearms .She wished to get love from Arjun so that she forgets Karna but it never happened. Krishnaa knew Draupadi from childhood and KNEW what she felt.He is the one who knew everything and used it manipulation instead, having a ball instead of resolving matters righteously! sadly arjun was not able to give her the love she wanted the minute draupadi got shared between the 5 brothers , and her silent love for Karna without her permission remained. Krishnaa had provoked a brother against another brother to kill him in a battle despite knowing they are half brothers.Krishnaa knew Karna was a Pandva but just causeof Karna's loyalty had the best of him he didnt join their force!what did krishnaa do DESPITE arjun not wanting to hurt in the last battle between them? he provoked arjun telling him the only way to kill karna.in the end all the pandvas broke down in killing their only brother, since they did not know then but KRISHNAA DID. draupadi got heart broken and kunti broke down knowing her sons are killing each other and she feeling helpless! all because of MAHAAAN KRISHNAA who couldve easily resolved matters!!!!!!!!!

He would have been a better corrupted politician than sonia gandhi and sheila dixit if he was a politician as a human in present india. dont even start on the "ever good" krishnaa. where is the women respect when you fling around with more than 3000 of your girlfriends and make girls like Radha and Meera hopelessly in love with you , become psychos bhatkaaoing in jungles just for you. Don't even mention THAT CURSE IN THE NAME OF A GOD AND CURSE IN THE NAME OF A MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 😡

Originally posted by: butterfly15..

I think you're in the wrong forum if you think you're going to get many logical responses.😆

This is the same forum where members thought it was ok for RK to force Madhu to go to his house and handcuff her to his bed, and that no-one should interfere in a husband-wife relationship no matter what.
RK could physically do something to Madhu, and people thought it was acceptable.
So I'm sure a little insulting is nothing to them, and no-one should interfere when a husband verbally abuses his wife.


It's hard to know what Indian Sanskar is termed as on this forum.
I'm with those that believe the right thing is to help someone who is in trouble, regardless of whether they are married or not.
Sanskar aside, it's a basic thing called humanity. How can anyone stand by and watch a women being insulted and hurt, and forcefully being taken away by her husband, and do absolutely nothing? Are people really that heartless that just because they think you shouldn't interfere in a husband and wife relationship, they wouldn't help a woman who is so obviously being hurt by her husband?
I'd like to believe that if ever I was in Madhu's position and by husband forcefully took me to his house, and insulted me time and time again, my family and friends would interfere and help me leave such a situation, and if they didn't or couldn't, I would happily take the help of a stranger.

Originally posted by: rajla

Kat...i could simply 🤗you for this

Originally posted by: Oh_No_Soaps

Platonically??? What has sultan done that is not platonic?! Yes I agree he is beginning to like madhu. But SO WHAT?? Yes as far as he knows she is married but there has been nothing that has gone even near the limit let alone beyond limit in terms of the maryadaa he keeps with madhu!! THAT is one of the reasons we love him so much btw!!

As for rk's senses or intuition. Watch just watch...he will hate the Aaryan's guts too not because he is sultan's son. With rk it isn't about the fact that another man likes madhu. Its about ANYONE liking madhu and getting even a lil bit of attention from her. If the neighbour's cat liked madhu, rk would kick it!

His wife died at least 6 years ago..Aaryan looks about six years ago. Honey most men wouldn't wait 6 months before remarrying especially if they had a baby to look after!!!

And I am glad lighter ke darshan nahi hue. He is moving on (is rk)? ! That is normal and as it should be. Obsessing over a dead wife isn't. Just as obsessing over a living BIWI isn't healthy!!!