Are you serious? You think the two situations are remotely the same? The difference between the two scenarios is not of 40 lakhs.
The difference is of choice. The child has no choice. Eating out of garbage is his only option. Madhu chose to eat out of the dustbin. Free will. She chose to do so to follow an archiac custom. The beauty of traditions lies in the emotions behind it. There is no set formula of steps 1 to 4. She chose to interpret the customs in a manner i find stupid to say the least.
The difference is in survival. The child is already probably malnourished and if he does not eat this, he is probably going to die. There is obviously no one there to care for him and look after him. This does not apply to madhu.
The difference is that this boy is uncared for, with no one there to take his responsibility. He does whatever he can bec of a human instinct of survival. Want to count how many ppl are looking after madhu?
The difference is that he is a CHILD. Madhu is a fully functional adult.I get that this was a fun post. And usually i amvery good at laughing everything off under the freedom to express oneself. But the sheer insensitivity of this post baffles me.I get that this was a fun post. And usually i amvery good at laughing everything off under the freedom to express oneself. But the sheer insensitivity of this post baffles me.
Dont know what gave you the idea that this was a fun post that you wrote like this.. If I make a fun post I make it very clear that it is a fun post. I was not making fun of the boy in my post.. But obviously you didnt get the meaning behind the post.. Perhaps you should think more before replying in haste..
ETA: Obviously there will be many in the forum who just read what is written in the post and not care to dwell on whats behind the post. You might be just one among many.. So no hard feelings...