deleted

wow wow superb post yaar..<3

Nw d Q. is who is poor in reality?

no words...excellent post👍🏼

agree.. nice post.. 👍🏼

one of the best posts I have read...I have no idea why people find it a big deal that she ate that from the garbage. When you want everything to go right, you do everything possible to make it right and that's exactly what madhu did. If eating the sargi from MIL was part of the tradition and part of KC, then whatever she did was right if that's the only way she can eat sargi, then I'd say you go girl...

Also, I don't know why people have problem with the remarriage, what I don't understand is why we have to judge everything, we judge every episode and every track we get, I say sit back and relax and watch the drama unfold. If until now the CV's have given us something nice to watch, I am positive they will not dissapoint us in the future. I, for one, have never judged any episodes, I am loving everything I see and everything I will see in the future. I am grateful for CV's to give us a nice drama to watch and amazing chemistry between RISHBALA.
Every show has been perfect for me, yes I do love more of DVD, but I am fine with what I get.

Originally posted by: emptyworld

very nice post

Shahi, You sound very subdued.. Whats wrong?

Excellent post Sonu👏

Are you serious? You think the two situations are remotely the same? The difference between the two scenarios is not of 40 lakhs.

The difference is of choice. The child has no choice. Eating out of garbage is his only option. Madhu chose to eat out of the dustbin. Free will. She chose to do so to follow an archiac custom. The beauty of traditions lies in the emotions behind it. There is no set formula of steps 1 to 4. She chose to interpret the customs in a manner i find stupid to say the least.

The difference is in survival. The child is already probably malnourished and if he does not eat this, he is probably going to die. There is obviously no one there to care for him and look after him. This does not apply to madhu.

The difference is that this boy is uncared for, with no one there to take his responsibility. He does whatever he can bec of a human instinct of survival. Want to count how many ppl are looking after madhu?

The difference is that he is a CHILD. Madhu is a fully functional adult.

I get that this was a fun post. And usually i amvery good at laughing everything off under the freedom to express oneself. But the sheer insensitivity of this post baffles me.