Originally posted by: .Arjun
Pooja was indirectly fighting for Anu's rights .In the last conversation, both Nigam's conviniently declined to appreciate what Pooja did. I think that pissed off pooja and then she probably called her "rakshasi" and tore that letter ! Which ofcourse was rude on Pooja's part ! But I feel somewhere pooja's actions were justified too. Anu did face raw deal in house but at the same time she was judgement about Pooja not being a good mom. In elite circle, we will hardly find any mom making garam fulka's for kids n eating in hall.
If it's about being judgemental.. then Pooja was also judgemantal.. she herself decided that because Anuradha is a housewife and does all the house work herself.. she needs an advocate to fight for her rights.. isn't it possible that Anuradha does it out of choice??
About not eating on dinning table and mom making garam fulkas for kids.. I agree it was not necessary for Anuradha to force it.. but just like elite people don't eat in living room... middle class people don't go out and spend couple of thousand rupees on decor items just because the decor color combination is not balanced..
And Pooja was right in showing her displeasure after the show by tearing Anuradha's letter.. she could have avoided "rakshasi" comment but then Rajiv also called her "Rakhi Sawant" which is not any less than "rakshasi".. but the Nigam's were not at fault for not appreciating what Pooja did and Rajiv did agree about the full time maid suggestion by Pooja.. but Pooja didn't have anything positive to say about Anuradha.. nor did she agree that her maid was at fault.. so it was even😊