Okay, so this woman has been the target of a lot of negative emotions from us fans. But I've been thinking about her character and I'm curious to discuss her in a healthy (that is, non-bashing) way that might cast some light over her intentions.
First thing that I cannot understand is how a woman who abandoned/betrayed her so-called first love for money can claim to love him seven years later? This really had me thinking. But then, she has been through a lot (been punished, perhaps, for her greediness) and has come to realize that she made the wrong choice all those years ago. Had she chosen Dutta's love, she might've been in a different place right now.
But Dutta has changed. Seema seems to be in love with the idea of the boy that once loved her so much that he was willing to do anything for her. The realization that she gave up that for money and ended up a kothewali... well, it's bound to make her regret, right?
I do believe that she has changed. The circumstances have changed her and made her realize that she could've had it better. But isn't this a selfish thought? Isn't her "love" still a bit selfish? She wants to take care of him, protect him, so that she can redeem herself and be forgiven - for the peace of her own mind.
Second thing that I wondered about is whether she was ever in love with Dutta in the first place? Whenever I see the flashbacks, I feel that - from her side - it was more of a crush. She was spoiled by him. He bought her things, showered her with his love, and any young girl would feel special if a boy gave her that much adoration. She enjoyed it - until she found something better, or should I say - someone with a heavier wallet.
If she was never in love with him, then how can she claim to love him now? Now when she has changed, but he has, too. Now when she doesn't know him.
In the end, isn't she still being partly selfish? Her redemption, her love, her peace of mind. The only part where I see her being not selfish is when she helps Nakku.