So does this revelation change everything? YES and NO.
Yes, in that she harbors anger for the loss. Anger at the person she holds responsible. In her mind, because of Dutta, the family lost out, of a father and a provider. That she and her mother and her sisters had to suffer because of that loss. Remember, it is NOT the lost love of a father for a daughter that she is angry about...it is the hardship of losing a provider. AS in the past mentions the pressure she put on Dutta to provide for the family, and the hardship they had to endure because he could not in the beginning.
And this is where the "NO" part comes in. Kala is fixated, I mean completely fixated on money, on the fact that she is ENTITLED to all this that Dutta has provided for: a big house, fancy clothes, jewelry, money, financial security, power, control. It is what Dutta OWES HER, since he took away the person who would have provided for her. IT IS HER RIGHT...TO EVERYTHING. That is Kala's world view.
So, today, I saw--NOT a person who lost the love of a father and hence was angry at her brother for causing the death of her second father--BUT RATHER, a person who had seen "something" taken away from her. Someone who saw hardship unleashed on her family once again...the lack of protection a father provides and financial security. I think this in part explains her desire to control money, to control Bhao. Yes, her anger is real, she blames Dutta, and hence feels she DESERVES to control him and the family. Perhaps she sees herself as the person who looks after the whole family--RAAJ. But, in reality, it is all about HER, HER, and HER.
What say you?