Karan-Nandini sidelined - Page 13

Originally posted by: muscleprotein

guy and girls already chatting 😆
ok to further elaborate on the theory
2 joodas paid for, 4 free, there were 6 joodas.
if Nandini was there would hvve been the 7th jooda and against the theory 😆 because 2J = 6J and not 7J 😭 hence she had to be sidelined !!
Got it PSJI 😛 , have I clarified the matter!!! 😆
and in the process the entire KN track is bound to be sidelined too 😉

oh k fine nw i got t..all da other bahu's except nandz s equal to 0 rite😛😆. .only my beautiful nandz has more value😳cz she s da besttttttttttttt👏👏👏

Originally posted by: princessunara

oh k fine nw i got t..all da other bahu's except nandz s equal to 0 rite😛😆. .only my beautiful nandz has more value😳cz she s da besttttttttttttt👏👏👏

hey too much of IF is affecting your Maths brain 😉 no one they are all +ve intigers and non zero , however if nandini was also a +ve intiger then theory would have been dispproved and she would NOT Have been sidelined !!😆

but proof of theory clearly shows she is being sidelined 😛

I really dont know what to say........ 😆 i have gone thru all the pages but dunno what to reply...

One thing is sure, that this topic beats CNS 😆

Lata ji, will u exaplain this einstein theory to me aswell?? 😆 😆

Originally posted by: muscleprotein

hey too much of IF is affecting your Maths brain 😉 no one they are all +ve intigers and non zero , however if nandini was also a +ve intiger then theory would have been dispproved and she would NOT Have been sidelined !!😆

but proof of theory clearly shows she is being sidelined 😛

well i dnt knw abt da affect n my math brain..bt wt i understood was dat every other bahu s commenly represented by "J" n 4 da equation 2J=6J to be correct J shud equal 0..thrfore all da bahu's except my beautiful nandz s ZORO😆

Originally posted by: muscleprotein

hey too much of IF is affecting your Maths brain 😉 no one they are all +ve intigers and non zero , however if nandini was also a +ve intiger then theory would have been dispproved and she would NOT Have been sidelined !!😆

but proof of theory clearly shows she is being sidelined 😛

i totaly understood u lata di😆..
u r a genious😆😆😆

anyway i take ur theary as base and can conclude something or the other😆

se if we want guari back she needs to be a +ve integer

so wat i think is
if 2j= 6j and guri 7j
then i think one way to bring back gasuri is to exchange it wid one of the +ve j

i mean if gauri needs to be there then 1 of the person included in 6j is to be relaced by gauri
then we can have kn track

wat do u think guys on this one😆

^^^^i even dont want to read all those 😆 i am a commerce student, so my maths isnt much strong. Plus i read in only class 9, therefore have no knowledgfe about what u people are talking.... 😳

Originally posted by: stranger@mirror

^^^^i even dont want to read all those 😆 i am a commerce student, so my maths isnt much strong. Plus i read in only class 9, therefore have no knowledgfe about what u people are talking.... 😳

itsvery simple labib

see if we want kn track then nandini shud replace one of the current showing bahu's (strictly acc to the theory)😆

Nandini shud replace----??? means??? Gauri pradhan shud be repolaced, or what???? not getting anything 😆

I guess we had had enuf of discussion on this....now its time for both the topic to get closed!!! we all are repaeating the same points again and again 😆