saying the truth then and saying the truth now...

saying the truth to abhi then and saying the truth to abhi now...what would of been the difference...at that time there was the present of a live baby...the evidence was not there...pragya did not know who was the father...now that the evidence has been gotten...the father is known...but the baby is no more now ...the truth is told to abhi... is it that the cv's wanted this truth out only when the baby was no more...so that abhi will have no physical connection to the baby anymore... and as such it will be easier for him to release himself from all attachments...for even if he found out the truth whilst the baby was alive...it would of been a lot harder for him..

Thats a good point Ann! I thought it was more for CVs to find another way to add another blame on Pragya and have Abhi resent her. *sigh* But I like your reasoning better.

Basically truth isn't going to unite them. Just an excuse to drag.

If Pragya's phone was cracked and they couldn't see the video couldn't they have hooked it up to a computer and watch the video? Was her phone damaged by the rain? So many proof she got and all went down the drain!