SPOILERS thread 4: BTS and upcoming arcs - Page 21

Originally posted by: _OrChiD_

Katha's whole conversation is so problematic and insulting. I don't know how Vanya sat there, listened those nonsense. Like women can't live without man in home? She literally defending and telling this with confidence.

She would have get married a old man too if man of the house asked her, after all she declared she is slave of man of the house.

Originally posted by: saakkabc

I didn’t know how to react after listening to yesterdays dialogues by Katha. WTH was that? Not at all relatable making a child man of the house. Making your child independent doesn’t mean he can be man of the house. Very poorly written dialogues. She is worried for him, that’s fine to an extent. But rest 😡

Originally posted by: divine_16

Have u heard her recent dialogues in the reunion bts?? She was advising Aarav that they are a team and that he has full rights to get offended, angry on them but "aisey chodkey nahi jatey".I was like...woman preach yourself first than feed those thought to your child. I was hoping that Vanya will for once ask Katha how would her marriage to Raghav can hide whatever happened...but thank God atleast she said that the truth will come out at some point of time and it's better to find a solution.

@red, really? How soon this women changes her views!!

Nowadays I don't watch offscreen staff, it had become habit to scroll, trying to stop habit.

Every child is protective towards their parents if they have good bonding with their parents.

In old ages, parents wielded absolute authority over children and had a difficult relationship with their children. Any disagreement with parent was punished severely. The kind of openness and freedom we experience now was not present in previous generations.

In male children (not only for humans but for other mammals as well), this protectiveness is amplified.

Originally posted by: _OrChiD_

Katha's whole conversation is so problematic and insulting. I don't know how Vanya sat there, listened those nonsense. Like women can't live without man in home? She literally defending and telling this with confidence.

She would have get married a old man too if man of the house asked her, after all she declared she is slave of man of the house.

What is this conclusion? How did you conclude it?

Originally posted by: divine_16

Have u heard her recent dialogues in the reunion bts?? She was advising Aarav that they are a team and that he has full rights to get offended, angry on them but "aisey chodkey nahi jatey".I was like...woman preach yourself first than feed those thought to your child. I was hoping that Vanya will for once ask Katha how would her marriage to Raghav can hide whatever happened...but thank God atleast she said that the truth will come out at some point of time and it's better to find a solution.

Marrying Raghav is something can't be justified. But, this means staying away from Viaan is justified. Right?

Originally posted by: Neutral2

Nothing, I was just pointing how she really remember Aadi which is natural. Even the first proper talk with Viaan was related to Aadi and how she started liking Viaan (more as a friend).

While few people said she started behaving like wife/gf after ONS, I am pointing that how painful it is for her even now that she can't properly talk about it.

@Bold I don't think she ever got comfortable talking about that night. It was never shown that way. Even during Dargah track, her face tells how uncomfortable and appalled she was on hearing Viaan. Then, she regained composure on seeing Viaan and consoled him. Its just a consolation and nothing else. Don't see how that concludes she was happy about the ONS. She also consoled Aarav during his treatment does that mean she was happy about his cancer treatment? She always consoled people no matter in how pathetic of a condition she was in.

@Red Was this theory discussed before as well? I haven't seen anything like this till now. I also read first 5 DTs of forums (in fast forward mode) I don't remember anything like this.

Originally posted by: divine_16

U know what....y'day after hearing Katha's dialogue I was totally in a trance.I mean I couldn't believe what even she was saying to Vanya.So didn't comment anything in the EDT .I remember long ago in one of my comment replying to someone I jokingly wrote that Katha made him man of the house and the kid took it seriously.But after y'days episode I was shocked that both Ma-beta took it seriouslyI mean WTH?? And she didn't even felt the need to rectify her child about this thought.She didn't make him realise that she is the head of the family and has the authority to take the decisions of their lives for the betterment of both of them.I now feel that I wasn't wrong in thinking that if Aarav thinks that it's good for her mother to marry a old man then she will abide by his whims. Now,if this was their mentality then why even as a viewer we are cribbing about Aarav taking decisions on Katha's behalf??"Aarav independent baccha hai" that's really good but becoming the man of the house in true sense and Katha encouraging that...I really have no words for such bull shit writing!! ITV shows always protray FL as mahaan and sacrifice ki devi...redemption of FL...that is far fetched bcoz in ITV shows FL can never be wrong !!

Its ironic that KA is exactly showing that. Everyone is bashing Katha. Now, Even Ehsan taunted Katha

Perpetrator, whether they did wrong or not, will always think what they are doing is right with full conviction.

Aarav is a boy/male/purush toh man of the house kahenge na. Woman of the house toh nahi kahenge

Originally posted by: _OrChiD_

Watched few clips from yesterdays episode and I am glad it's ending

Aarav bana mera protector, he thinks she protects me Hello, you are her mummy, he is not your father.

Aarav bana man of the house Hello what women does in home? Follow mans order to exist? Downgrade architect Do not even want to talk about kids overstepping.

We (Arav) can handle everything he is your son women

Problematic women A to Z.

Katha needed redemption badly but ITV is so obsessed with FLs ethicless ethic.

https://youtu.be/ODqhefccdQA?si=J2n2yDZ6lB_oEbuy