Originally posted by: IFLove
Not much addicted to the show anyways, but still got a reality check today. The entire Mumbai is flooding, trains r stuck at a place, people r not able to reach their workplaces, some are losing out on their income for the day and when been through all this, I realise there r such grave problems around n we r stuck in petty fights here (including me). So let's take a chill pill guys n give our opinions nicely n let's not fight
Coming to the point, the story of this show has forever been regressive, hence never had great expectations from it. The disappointment is the same story is being recycled. But I seem to find one difference though.
Anurag agreed to marry komolika to save his business, their houses etc etc. He was totally wrong to give up so easily n not trying to find a way out after marriage as well. He was bashed left right n centre for humiliating prerna n her love, publicly. The viewers have not forgiven the writers for letting him go without a loud n clear apology, some have understood their way have of understanding though. At that time, komo was a vamp n was definitely wrong with her obsession and destructive personality. Anurag too was wrong in giving up and humiliating Prerna. What created a difference among Anu n komo was komo had bad intentions whereas Anu didn't. That made komo a vamp n Anu a hero. However, a fact remains that Anurag was wrong!
In Naveen babu track, prerna was blackmailed into marrying due to the mortgaged house. She agreed to that to save the property in which her parents were emotionally invested. She should have taken other ways to arrange the funds, she should have shared this with her family or her friend anurag, she didn't. She was wrong n was bashed left right n centre. Again, what made a difference was intentions. Naveen had intentions to sell her to the richies abroad which were wrong and prerna had intentions to protect her family's emotions n a roof on their heads which was good. Hence Naveen was a villain n prerna a heroine. Fact still remains undenied that prerna was wrong!
Now comes bajaj track. Bajaj has intentions to destroy Basu's. We don't know yet whether the agenda is personal or professional. Whatever it is, it is wrong. Destruction can never ever be justified, unless they show us a strong motive in future. Till then bajaj is a villain for me. Though he might not be intending to have a romantic marriage with prerna as of now, but doing anything in the name of destroying someone is vile. Coming to blackmailing part, it is wrong, no doubt n no arguments on that hopefully. About age, I guess any age gap is ok till both r in love. If an old man or woman forces a younger woman or man to marry using their power, it is cringy. Being blackmailed by a person ur age is bad too. But imagine being teased or molested by a person ur age n a person ur father's age or double Ur age. Who will give u more creeps? Obviously the uncle! I know bajaj has no lusty intentions as of now, this was just an example to explain y age difference is making the whole issue more worse for some. I'll wait to see what prerna thinks n does. If she easily gives up, she'll be wrong too. However one thing that differs here from previous tracks is that no sacrifice is being done for money or property or emotions. Prerna will bend down to bajaj to save Anu from the jail. She'll realise that bajaj is too powerful to be defeated, that this is the only way she can save her Anurag from being jailed n ensure his safety. It is about his life and death. It's quite realistic that there r such powerful personalities in front of whom u really can do nothing apart from bending down to them n choosing their ways. Naveen was not as powerful as bajaj and saving Anurag from fake murder charges is a more serious issue than saving Sharma nivas...this is the difference. My only hope is, writes leave no loopholes n show prerna trying every other way before giving in to bajaj. Or else, she will have her share of bashing.
PS-
1. A woman is not being humiliated for the first time, the post against it is not being written for the first time too. Like everytime such post was created, it is being created now too n hence should be taken in the same spirit.
2. A worse thing doesn't make a bad thing good. Just because bajaj isn't lusty, it doesn't make his destructive n blackmailing actions any great
3. Anurag n prerna have been as much wrong in their places too but what makes them better than komo n bajaj r their intentions, theirs r to save something n komo-bajaj's r to destroy something
4. Old age charm might appeal some people, boyish charm might appeal the others. Ruthless personality might be attractive for some, honest innocene might be for others. Let's all agree to disagree on that without mocking the choices of others.