why KS is not working? - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

57

Views

7.9k

Users

21

Likes

162

Frequent Posters

VARUNI2014 thumbnail
7th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#21
The Frank reason is
First of all the work regarded by historians close to vyasa mahabharat is Ganguly book on Maha Bharat

Even star plus Maha Bharat was taken from Ganguly book

And br Chopra mahabharat was also inspired from Ganguly book

Both producers told that

And no where in Ganguly mahabharat there's a mention of uruvi character

And mahabharat ramayan are NOT MYTHOLOGY they f called ITHIHASAS

That means they happened at some point of time

And Kavita book on urvi is completely fictional


People don't like to tweak ITHIHASAS Might be some youngsters don't have no problem but those youngsters are more interested in Netflix any way so they don't watch this show

And people who tend to watch this don't like getting mahabharat tweaked



They are more interested in pandavas Krishna story rather than katns that too tweaked fictionally


Even before this show started I said to some tejaswi fans this show is doomed and thus wI'll be a failure and tejaswini .Made a wrong choiceg

I won't expect this show trp to pick up and according to star plus rules any bad trp show less than 1 trp willl be there for 6 months I suppose

AngelicNee thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#22

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

The Frank reason is

First of all the work regarded by historians close to vyasa mahabharat is Ganguly book on Maha Bharat

Even star plus Maha Bharat was taken from Ganguly book

And br Chopra mahabharat was also inspired from Ganguly book

Both producers told that

And no where in Ganguly mahabharat there's a mention of uruvi character

And mahabharat ramayan are NOT MYTHOLOGY they f called ITHIHASAS

That means they happened at some point of time

And Kavita book on urvi is completely fictional


People don't like to tweak ITHIHASAS Might be some youngsters don't have no problem but those youngsters are more interested in Netflix any way so they don't watch this show

And people who tend to watch this don't like getting mahabharat tweaked



They are more interested in pandavas Krishna story rather than katns that too tweaked fictionally


Even before this show started I said to some tejaswi fans this show is doomed and thus wI'll be a failure and tejaswini .Made a wrong choiceg

I won't expect this show trp to pick up and according to star plus rules any bad trp show less than 1 trp willl be there for 6 months I suppose

i remember we had talked once regarding this..
AngelicNee thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#23

Originally posted by: musicalstorm

The thing is not to accept a new story, not even what is told is wrong. It is mythology so it is a myth. You can interpret anything from it. Various scriptures have different story to tell.

Now coming to accept a new show. You say when Star Plus started Mahabharat people were not ready to accept it as BR Chopra was the best. I am a 21 year old girl will not like it. I was so curious to watch Mahabharat. That Mahabharat is the best for our generation.

Even the actors have set the bar. The show can go good only if there are good actors. Change is good but you will not like the change when you have already seen a better change. I will not say no to change. . If you have seen than they also took some shots from Mahabharat for Karna sangini

I also know the following actors through Mahabharat only Shaheer was perfect as Arjun, Aham was perfect as Karna, SRJ undoubtedly good as Krishna, Praneet was perfect as Shakuni. The guy playing Duryodhan does not even look like Duryodhan. Big sets are good but proper selection of actors also matters

i too feel older people not able to accept the fictonal story.. MB clips were used by star in promos.. but Karnsangini is not mahabharat.. so comparing is not possible... it is a fictional story set up in MB background..
mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#24
Puranas are our rich scripture treasure. Shruti & Smriti forms the very base of our scriptures. Enlightened rishis saw them during their meditations. Some rishis themselves were part of these stories. They told their disciples, who in turn told others, whatever they remembered. So puranas can not be termed as Myths. They were actual events. People present in that era had experienced them. Even today evidences are found about some events happened earlier.
It's our Human brain which sees them as Myths & considers as open to interpretation to validate limited understanding.
Ramayan & Mahabharat are read & heard by many of us since childhood. Very few will accept fictional characters added unless the character is quite Authentic & genuine like, "Samay", narrating story in old Mahabharat.
Makers & channel should have taken an unexplored or least explored story to get viewers interested.
Edited by mnx12 - 6 years ago
riti4u thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 6 years ago
#25

Originally posted by: mnx12

Puranas are our rich scripture treasure. Shruti & Smriti forms the very base of our scriptures. Enlightened rishis saw them during their meditations. Some rishis themselves were part of these stories. They told their disciples, who in turn told others, whatever they remembered. So puranas can not be termed as Myths. They were actual events. People present in that era had experienced them. Even today evidences are found about some events happened earlier.
It's our Human brain which sees them as Myths & considers as open to interpretation to validate limited understanding.
Ramayan & Mahabharat are read & heard by many of us since childhood. Very few will accept fictional characters added unless the character is quite Authentic & genuine like, "Samay", narrating story in old Mahabharat.
Makers & channel should have taken an unexplored or least explored story to get viewers interested.


Yes evidences are found thats true but the story in narration can be deviated from the actual events. There is no actual proof of written scriptures being that old when story was actually narrated. Its been oral form for many years and there is a possibility of deviation too and indeed it is not possible to include all the characters in the story especially when they are not Key characters leading to war. Karn's wife is unknown in the actual narration. She doesnt even have a name. Thus that possibility of what her journey would have been gives an author countless possibilities to explore. Yes ofcourse her being so involved and being so close to pandavas ,one can argue but original novel also takes this liberty. So far i dont think they are altering the events that took place. Mahabharat does not focus much on feelings unless it is in the important events like VH and war related stuff.. there is always a possibility to explore unseen side of women who were widowed on the other side.. Makers are already exploring unseen side.. 😊
Doreman thumbnail
5th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#26

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

The Frank reason is

First of all the work regarded by historians close to vyasa mahabharat is Ganguly book on Maha Bharat

Even star plus Maha Bharat was taken from Ganguly book

And br Chopra mahabharat was also inspired from Ganguly book

Both producers told that

And no where in Ganguly mahabharat there's a mention of uruvi character

And mahabharat ramayan are NOT MYTHOLOGY they f called ITHIHASAS

That means they happened at some point of time

And Kavita book on urvi is completely fictional


People don't like to tweak ITHIHASAS Might be some youngsters don't have no problem but those youngsters are more interested in Netflix any way so they don't watch this show

And people who tend to watch this don't like getting mahabharat tweaked



They are more interested in pandavas Krishna story rather than katns that too tweaked fictionally


Even before this show started I said to some tejaswi fans this show is doomed and thus wI'll be a failure and tejaswini .Made a wrong choiceg

I won't expect this show trp to pick up and according to star plus rules any bad trp show less than 1 trp willl be there for 6 months I suppose


Hi, how are you? Hope you remember me .

MAHABHARAT is vast , it's like an ocean. It contains several substories .
May be this serial is fictional , but when compared to some of the so called fictional and mythological serials I think KS is far better. The problem is with CVs , they doesn't know to promote their shows and also how to get trp ( Same happened with RLHN). They should learn from EK , even though the show is below average how she will manage to get higher trp.

VARUNI2014 thumbnail
7th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#27

Originally posted by: AngelicNee

i remember we had talked once regarding this..

Yep reason for me not watching this show also us the sane reason .I don't like tweaking of ithihadas like mahabharat and ramayane
VARUNI2014 thumbnail
7th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#28

Originally posted by: Doreman


Hi, how are you? Hope you remember me .

MAHABHARAT is vast , it's like an ocean. It contains several substories .
May be this serial is fictional , but when compared to some of the so called fictional and mythological serials I think KS is far better. The problem is with CVs , they doesn't know to promote their shows and also how to get trp ( Same happened with RLHN). They should learn from EK , even though the show is below average how she will manage to get higher trp.

Yes I remember you .I did not forget any one from rlhn forum 😊
Problem is not with direction or taking .problem is with story .karna is known as one among dusta chatustaya in mahabharat .people won't be interested in a fictional show on him

But if u make a fictional on Krishna they r interested or even on Arjuna
What ever we might make fun of ekta ...but ekta knows how to get audience hitched ..she will never make blunders like by choosing karnsanginiii type subject
She willl choose supernatural .Or drama with triangular lovevstory
Her .. Intelligence is choosing naagin as supernatural show since she knows people if all ages fascinated always with naaglok and it is nentioned in magabgarat too and people do poojas to naagins too ..

She did not choose any foreign super natural series as it would not attract trp auntiesv
Edited by VARUNI2014 - 6 years ago
riti4u thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 6 years ago
#29
Well Karna is one of most liked character of Mahabharat and interesting conflicting personality makes him most sought after character for books, TV and films.. thats the reason there have been already two shows recently on him.. and yes in past also there has been one show called Maharathi Karn on him.. People like his story.. and thus these novels on him are best selling ones...
mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#30
@ riti, We are discussing the reasons for why the show is not working. Those who are convinced are already watching the show. But ratings shows viewers are quite few.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".