None of the arguments are making any sense.
She gave equal tracks to people? When. Not only the feb3 were reduced to being random non-entities who had no connect with the story. She brought in a new character AT the expense of old ones.
The story ended up revolving around Maddy. So how the heck..she opened the tracks. Did anyone not see what was happening to other side actors? The story was revolving around Maddy and Nandini was playing it off along with another newbie Arya.
Yes, Niti liked working with her buddy but that doesn't mean or relate to what happened in S2.
I am missing one comment from her about owning up to her own dismal performance as an actor. She has in her other iv blamed fans for not supporting S2 and said we didn't give them the chance when neither content/vision/acting was good.
Yeah, she had fun with karishma coz dollhouse tea parties..Great, such a parameter.
I think people are not getting the point that S2 continued from S1. There is bound to be a direct comparison. Had karishma tried her OWN story and different character then Niti's argument about working style would have made some sense. Because from where I can see- Karishma didn't give a shit about what she served to audience, nor did it matter what the character work and rode on the popularity of S1.
Edited by charminggenie - 9 years ago
Members Lounge
Book Talk
Current Affairs
