The Root.... - Page 2

👏😊

Nandini discovered the goodness in manik the day manik saved her brother. She knew his monsterous face was a facade he chose to show the world. He himself confessed in soha,s farmhouse with her. She has had so many occassions to know him reasonably well. and moreover who in their mind will chose to dillydally on such a crucial time when you are giving a statement in front of the magistrate which could mean jail or bail??

I agree with you...here is something I posted on another thread: :P

It was really very wrong of her to do that...no matter what anyone showed her or tried to manipulate things.
I would've never thought that she would utter those words. I expected that she would say that it was all done in self-defence and that he was a good human being and would never do that intentionally.
But saying that you're not sure! Thinking of all those times? Doubting him to be vindictive? I was like oh come on Nandini..dont you KNOW him?? he always had it covered. And he's not vindictive. Trust him.
I didn't get where her thoughts were taking her. Was she thinking he did that intentionally when she was in the magistrate's office? It sure seemed like that. How does him being overprotective or for a second lets say vindictive relate to him accidentally pushing Soha toward death in defence??(as known to Nandini)

I do not agree on the past memories haunting/affecting her somehow though.
There was never a situation this grave.
Fab5 were never murderers. They did stuff that played with the psyche of their victims yes but for this to leave an everlasting impression on Nandini? I don't think so... That was something else. This however is a matter of life and death. This is grave...


--But I'm not that angry with anyone. Read on--

--And, I get what you're saying. The problem lies in the roots. It is not Nandini whom we should be blaming. We should be blaming the fragility of their love.--



Yesterday made it clear that she still doesn't trust him completely and I'm angry about that. But why was this shown? For the final shift to utmost invincible untenable trust between the two. He trusts her completely or not as of yet remains to be seen. It will be clear on Monday. Whether he holds it against her...but I would be surprised if he didn't. It can't just be one way trust right? So if she didn't, he shouldn't. He can't.


My point is, this is what will lead to the establishment of blind trust between them. Once all this ends, they'll believe each other more than anyone. More than themselves. Their love is still naive...they need this.
And so I'm waiting to see how this plays out.


Great post Eve! This was needed!

Originally posted by: -bharti-

Nandini discovered the goodness in manik the day manik saved her brother. She knew his monsterous face was a facade he chose to show the world. He himself confessed in soha,s farmhouse with her. She has had so many occassions to know him reasonably well. and moreover who in their mind will chose to dillydally on such a crucial time when you are giving a statement in front of the magistrate which could mean jail or bail??

She had seen the video where manik was seen to have nudged soha only to save nandini. That was more than sufficient for her to speak in his favour. NO! she choses to dig deep n act dumb at the most crucial time. Anyone anyone including a saintly person can harm another person to save oneself or their luvd ones, thats called self defense. So even if manik was seen pushing soha aside it was a clear case of defensive act.

The CVs have messed up totally, nandini has chosen the worst day possible to display her honesty. If she coulld have saved someone by her statement then there was somethg to defend her, according to her soha is dead n manik is on the verge of being rejected a bail based on her statement yet? what has she achieved here by doubting manik in front of the magistrate?

Originally posted by: Sue101

Ok i will be kind ..yaar eve 😆🤗

so you wrote so much to say why nandu had to say what she said, and the reason being manik himself

so now tell be,'

- why the next moment she had to change her views and beg the judge saying she was wrong and manik is not involved

- why did she run behind the jeep, where manik was handcuffed and taken

- why did she cry to navya saying that she did something wrong?

so she feels what she did was wrong right?😆

ps : btw your other topic was so nice to read because fully it was manik's pain and you smart girl one topic supporting manik and other supporting nandu wah wah girl u be the queen ⭐️

totally agree eveline..this is the root cause..she somewhere still has doubts as how he will behave in an aggressive moment. the reason she had the flashback of harshad incident proves it...

Awesome analysis of Nandini's psyche. It totally makes sense. And I believe its true that, its easy to forgive but very difficult to forget.

Originally posted by: arathim

That was more than sufficient for her to speak in his favour.

In the court of law she was asked to state the Fact...the Truth...and that is what she did...

She was not asked for character certification...just to state the fact...

And the fact was she was not sure what happened...since she was not conscious...

She even cant say Dont know...as already Nyonica went with her being conscious story...

If she coulld have saved someone by her statement then there was somethg to defend her, according to her soha is dead n manik is on the verge of being rejected a bail based on her statement yet? what has she achieved here by doubting manik in front of the magistrate?

She doesnt doubt Manik...she always insists either it was an accident or an act of pure self defence ...She merely refuses be dishonest in front of Law and say that she was sure since she was conscious...Nandhini is Honest like that...its a characteristic that defines her...To stand for the Truth...No Shortcuts...

it is so convenient to say she is an honest person, really? how many times she has not lied to manik ?? where was her honesty ?? it was her intelligent brain which thought it was the best thing to do in a given situation. This present situation begged of her to be smart, she knew nyonika was not to be trusted, she knew the implications of her statement. she only had to know if she trusted her manik if he would have harmed soha without any reason? was that too big to expect from her.

Originally posted by: -bharti-

it is so convenient to say she is an honest person, really? how many times she has not lied to manik ?? where was her honesty ?? it was her intelligent brain which thought it was the best thing to do in a given situation. This present situation begged of her to be smart, she knew nyonika was not to be trusted, she knew the implications of her statement. she only had to know if she trusted her manik if he would have harmed soha without any reason? was that too big to expect from her.

Then we have so many saying she is just 17, then what about those times when she has behaved beyond her age. We cannot be selective to suit our needs. One has to accept she faltered big time here, honesty n age cannot come to her defense here.

There is a saying in english, straight trees are the ones to axed first.