Being the Devil's Advocate here - Page 3

Very well analyzed , Reshmi. I think everyone was justified to an extent in acting the way they did in the heat of the moment. Rohit’s frustration and blaming Sona was understandable, him keeping at it was irritating but Sona seemed to get it that Rohit was just venting unreasonably and in anger. He does gain some measure of control over himself and shuts up at the Rastogi house.

I totally agree that Pari was not after Rohan for his money, doesn’t make what she did less despicable but I don’t think she is a gold digger, she is hot headed, has a vengeful streak in her, is selfish to the core but money was not what she was after.

Also true that Suman’s character has been considerably softened from the initial portrayal of her. She chastises Pari more, is more caring of Sona, and has overall been made palatable for the audience.

Btw, Pari is the one who alludes to Rohan’s string of affairs prior to her. Tanya was going to expose Rohan and Pari publicly and that would not have been less of a tamasha. It just got averted by Tanya’s heartbreak at seeing that video so it would have been a Sippy that humiliated the Sippys by washing their dirty linen in public.

Suman, in her defense, was not specific with her taunts but the moment the great Naren Sippy called the guards to throw her out is when her vitriol came gushing out.

Rohit stopped questioning Rohan not because Rohan asked him to stop but because Sona stopped Rohit by cautioning him to talk later.

in Sona’s defense, she did try to tell Rohit about the blackmailer, he was too lost in his nervousness about the surgery and instead of adding to his worries, Sona decided to handle it herself. Things have been unraveling too fast, she hasn’t had time to digest about Ajit’s gambling habit to tell Rohit about it. She forgave Rohit in the blink of an eye, no questions asked when she found out the truth about Rani. She stood staunchly by his side at the hospital when Rani tried to instigate her. Sona is a nice person, too much in love and a tad bit too idealistic, therein don’t lie her flaws. Her flaw is her compulsion to please Veena and be a perfect bahu which leads her to interfere in situations she should stay far away from. Rohit is not wrong in his POV either just a bit too impulsive with his words.

The only person I felt was not justified in her actioins was Veena. Don’t get me wrong, Veena is sweet and kind and is the glue that binds the Sippy family. But her rushing to berate Pari, slapping her twice and accusing Pari of being unable to contain her raging hormones and being a cheap gold digger was not warranted as Veena had not yet accosted her own creep of a son and had not chastised him for his grave sin. Her son had strayed in spite of being married after knowing he was to soon become a dad. The guy is shameless, tells Pari he doesn’t care, he still loves her and won’t let her go, he tells Rohit not to question him. Rohan is cheap, he plots and snares young vulnerable girls - his friend had warned him, Tanya had questioned him, he himself had seen the tracker but he shamelessly carries on. With such a son, Veena was wrong in assuming butter will not melt in Rohan’s mouth ‘cos of her faultless parvarish.

I still hold by what I had written yesterday, glad the Sippy’s’ truth was brought to light. I saw no one standing up for Sona when that friend of Naren’s was talking crap about Sona’s character. She had to defend herself, Veena did not open her mouth.

Deepa gives me the creeps sometimes, she was seen to be envious of the love and attention Sona was getting from Veena. She has slapped Pari too. Deepa could have disclosed the truth to the family and nipped the affair in the bud, she didn’t, instead she plots alongside of Tanya to do a public expose of Pari. The Sippys are so protective of Puja and even pay a woman to come act as her mother but they care two hoots about Pari’s reputation, airing the video in front of their friends at the party would have further ruined Pari’s (maybe nonexistent?) reputation.

I would say the Sippys got what was coming to them. Truth will out somehow and it did.

Originally posted by: soapwatcher1

Very well analyzed , Reshmi. I think everyone was justified to an extent in acting the way they did in the heat of the moment. Rohit’s frustration and blaming Sona was understandable, him keeping at it was irritating but Sona seemed to get it that Rohit was just venting unreasonably and in anger. He does gain some measure of control over himself and shuts up at the Rastogi house.

I totally agree that Pari was not after Rohan for his money, doesn’t make what she did less despicable but I don’t think she is a gold digger, she is hot headed, has a vengeful streak in her, is selfish to the core but money was not what she was after.

Also true that Suman’s character has been considerably softened from the initial portrayal of her. She chastises Pari more, is more caring of Sona, and has overall been made palatable for the audience.

Btw, Pari is the one who alludes to Rohan’s string of affairs prior to her. Tanya was going to expose Rohan and Pari publicly and that would not have been less of a tamasha. It just got averted by Tanya’s heartbreak at seeing that video so it would have been a Sippy that humiliated the Sippys by washing their dirty linen in public.

Suman, in her defense, was not specific with her taunts but the moment the great Naren Sippy called the guards to throw her out is when her vitriol came gushing out.

Rohit stopped questioning Rohan not because Rohan asked him to stop but because Sona stopped Rohit by cautioning him to talk later.

in Sona’s defense, she did try to tell Rohit about the blackmailer, he was too lost in his nervousness about the surgery and instead of adding to his worries, Sona decided to handle it herself. Things have been unraveling too fast, she hasn’t had time to digest about Ajit’s gambling habit to tell Rohit about it. She forgave Rohit in the blink of an eye, no questions asked when she found out the truth about Rani. She stood staunchly by his side at the hospital when Rani tried to instigate her. Sona is a nice person, too much in love and a tad bit too idealistic, therein don’t lie her flaws. Her flaw is her compulsion to please Veena and be a perfect bahu which leads her to interfere in situations she should stay far away from. Rohit is not wrong in his POV either just a bit too impulsive with his words.

The only person I felt was not justified in her actioins was Veena. Don’t get me wrong, Veena is sweet and kind and is the glue that binds the Sippy family. But her rushing to berate Pari, slapping her twice and accusing Pari of being unable to contain her raging hormones and being a cheap gold digger was not warranted as Veena had not yet accosted her own creep of a son and had not chastised him for his grave sin. Her son had strayed in spite of being married after knowing he was to soon become a dad. The guy is shameless, tells Pari he doesn’t care, he still loves her and won’t let her go, he tells Rohit not to question him. Rohan is cheap, he plots and snares young vulnerable girls - his friend had warned him, Tanya had questioned him, he himself had seen the tracker but he shamelessly carries on. With such a son, Veena was wrong in assuming butter will not melt in Rohan’s mouth ‘cos of her faultless parvarish.

I still hold by what I had written yesterday, glad the Sippy’s’ truth was brought to light. I saw no one standing up for Sona when that friend of Naren’s was talking crap about Sona’s character. She had to defend herself, Veena did not open her mouth.

Deepa gives me the creeps sometimes, she was seen to be envious of the love and attention Sona was getting from Veena. She has slapped Pari too. Deepa could have disclosed the truth to the family and nipped the affair in the bud, she didn’t, instead she plots alongside of Tanya to do a public expose of Pari. The Sippys are so protective of Puja and even pay a woman to come act as her mother but they care two hoots about Pari’s reputation, airing the video in front of their friends at the party would have further ruined Pari’s (maybe nonexistent?) reputation.

I would say the Sippys got what was coming to them. Truth will out somehow and it did.

How much time she needs .instead of lying she gave 1cr to her co star when rohith asked her she could tell truth in 10 minutes

Sona can't be justified in not telling to rohith

Originally posted by: soapwatcher1

Very well analyzed , Reshmi. I think everyone was justified to an extent in acting the way they did in the heat of the moment. Rohit’s frustration and blaming Sona was understandable, him keeping at it was irritating but Sona seemed to get it that Rohit was just venting unreasonably and in anger. He does gain some measure of control over himself and shuts up at the Rastogi house.

I totally agree that Pari was not after Rohan for his money, doesn’t make what she did less despicable but I don’t think she is a gold digger, she is hot headed, has a vengeful streak in her, is selfish to the core but money was not what she was after.

Also true that Suman’s character has been considerably softened from the initial portrayal of her. She chastises Pari more, is more caring of Sona, and has overall been made palatable for the audience.

Btw, Pari is the one who alludes to Rohan’s string of affairs prior to her. Tanya was going to expose Rohan and Pari publicly and that would not have been less of a tamasha. It just got averted by Tanya’s heartbreak at seeing that video so it would have been a Sippy that humiliated the Sippys by washing their dirty linen in public.

Suman, in her defense, was not specific with her taunts but the moment the great Naren Sippy called the guards to throw her out is when her vitriol came gushing out.

Rohit stopped questioning Rohan not because Rohan asked him to stop but because Sona stopped Rohit by cautioning him to talk later.

in Sona’s defense, she did try to tell Rohit about the blackmailer, he was too lost in his nervousness about the surgery and instead of adding to his worries, Sona decided to handle it herself. Things have been unraveling too fast, she hasn’t had time to digest about Ajit’s gambling habit to tell Rohit about it. She forgave Rohit in the blink of an eye, no questions asked when she found out the truth about Rani. She stood staunchly by his side at the hospital when Rani tried to instigate her. Sona is a nice person, too much in love and a tad bit too idealistic, therein don’t lie her flaws. Her flaw is her compulsion to please Veena and be a perfect bahu which leads her to interfere in situations she should stay far away from. Rohit is not wrong in his POV either just a bit too impulsive with his words.

The only person I felt was not justified in her actioins was Veena. Don’t get me wrong, Veena is sweet and kind and is the glue that binds the Sippy family. But her rushing to berate Pari, slapping her twice and accusing Pari of being unable to contain her raging hormones and being a cheap gold digger was not warranted as Veena had not yet accosted her own creep of a son and had not chastised him for his grave sin. Her son had strayed in spite of being married after knowing he was to soon become a dad. The guy is shameless, tells Pari he doesn’t care, he still loves her and won’t let her go, he tells Rohit not to question him. Rohan is cheap, he plots and snares young vulnerable girls - his friend had warned him, Tanya had questioned him, he himself had seen the tracker but he shamelessly carries on. With such a son, Veena was wrong in assuming butter will not melt in Rohan’s mouth ‘cos of her faultless parvarish.

I still hold by what I had written yesterday, glad the Sippy’s’ truth was brought to light. I saw no one standing up for Sona when that friend of Naren’s was talking crap about Sona’s character. She had to defend herself, Veena did not open her mouth.

Deepa gives me the creeps sometimes, she was seen to be envious of the love and attention Sona was getting from Veena. She has slapped Pari too. Deepa could have disclosed the truth to the family and nipped the affair in the bud, she didn’t, instead she plots alongside of Tanya to do a public expose of Pari. The Sippys are so protective of Puja and even pay a woman to come act as her mother but they care two hoots about Pari’s reputation, airing the video in front of their friends at the party would have further ruined Pari’s (maybe nonexistent?) reputation.

I would say the Sippys got what was coming to them. Truth will out somehow and it did.

👍🏼

Originally posted by: soapwatcher1

Very well analyzed , Reshmi. I think everyone was justified to an extent in acting the way they did in the heat of the moment. Rohit’s frustration and blaming Sona was understandable, him keeping at it was irritating but Sona seemed to get it that Rohit was just venting unreasonably and in anger. He does gain some measure of control over himself and shuts up at the Rastogi house.

I totally agree that Pari was not after Rohan for his money, doesn’t make what she did less despicable but I don’t think she is a gold digger, she is hot headed, has a vengeful streak in her, is selfish to the core but money was not what she was after.

Also true that Suman’s character has been considerably softened from the initial portrayal of her. She chastises Pari more, is more caring of Sona, and has overall been made palatable for the audience.

Btw, Pari is the one who alludes to Rohan’s string of affairs prior to her. Tanya was going to expose Rohan and Pari publicly and that would not have been less of a tamasha. It just got averted by Tanya’s heartbreak at seeing that video so it would have been a Sippy that humiliated the Sippys by washing their dirty linen in public.

Suman, in her defense, was not specific with her taunts but the moment the great Naren Sippy called the guards to throw her out is when her vitriol came gushing out.

Rohit stopped questioning Rohan not because Rohan asked him to stop but because Sona stopped Rohit by cautioning him to talk later.

in Sona’s defense, she did try to tell Rohit about the blackmailer, he was too lost in his nervousness about the surgery and instead of adding to his worries, Sona decided to handle it herself. Things have been unraveling too fast, she hasn’t had time to digest about Ajit’s gambling habit to tell Rohit about it. She forgave Rohit in the blink of an eye, no questions asked when she found out the truth about Rani. She stood staunchly by his side at the hospital when Rani tried to instigate her. Sona is a nice person, too much in love and a tad bit too idealistic, therein don’t lie her flaws. Her flaw is her compulsion to please Veena and be a perfect bahu which leads her to interfere in situations she should stay far away from. Rohit is not wrong in his POV either just a bit too impulsive with his words.

The only person I felt was not justified in her actioins was Veena. Don’t get me wrong, Veena is sweet and kind and is the glue that binds the Sippy family. But her rushing to berate Pari, slapping her twice and accusing Pari of being unable to contain her raging hormones and being a cheap gold digger was not warranted as Veena had not yet accosted her own creep of a son and had not chastised him for his grave sin. Her son had strayed in spite of being married after knowing he was to soon become a dad. The guy is shameless, tells Pari he doesn’t care, he still loves her and won’t let her go, he tells Rohit not to question him. Rohan is cheap, he plots and snares young vulnerable girls - his friend had warned him, Tanya had questioned him, he himself had seen the tracker but he shamelessly carries on. With such a son, Veena was wrong in assuming butter will not melt in Rohan’s mouth ‘cos of her faultless parvarish.

I still hold by what I had written yesterday, glad the Sippy’s’ truth was brought to light. I saw no one standing up for Sona when that friend of Naren’s was talking crap about Sona’s character. She had to defend herself, Veena did not open her mouth.

Deepa gives me the creeps sometimes, she was seen to be envious of the love and attention Sona was getting from Veena. She has slapped Pari too. Deepa could have disclosed the truth to the family and nipped the affair in the bud, she didn’t, instead she plots alongside of Tanya to do a public expose of Pari. The Sippys are so protective of Puja and even pay a woman to come act as her mother but they care two hoots about Pari’s reputation, airing the video in front of their friends at the party would have further ruined Pari’s (maybe nonexistent?) reputation.

I would say the Sippys got what was coming to them. Truth will out somehow and it did.

Exactly that's why in my real life also I encourage my kids to be transparent..i.never hide secrets .

Truth has a bad habit of getting revealed some how .

Truth will.only hurt once.lies will.hurt u.multiple times

Originally posted by: soapwatcher1

Very well analyzed , Reshmi. I think everyone was justified to an extent in acting the way they did in the heat of the moment. Rohit’s frustration and blaming Sona was understandable, him keeping at it was irritating but Sona seemed to get it that Rohit was just venting unreasonably and in anger. He does gain some measure of control over himself and shuts up at the Rastogi house.

I totally agree that Pari was not after Rohan for his money, doesn’t make what she did less despicable but I don’t think she is a gold digger, she is hot headed, has a vengeful streak in her, is selfish to the core but money was not what she was after.

Also true that Suman’s character has been considerably softened from the initial portrayal of her. She chastises Pari more, is more caring of Sona, and has overall been made palatable for the audience.

Btw, Pari is the one who alludes to Rohan’s string of affairs prior to her. Tanya was going to expose Rohan and Pari publicly and that would not have been less of a tamasha. It just got averted by Tanya’s heartbreak at seeing that video so it would have been a Sippy that humiliated the Sippys by washing their dirty linen in public.

Suman, in her defense, was not specific with her taunts but the moment the great Naren Sippy called the guards to throw her out is when her vitriol came gushing out.

Rohit stopped questioning Rohan not because Rohan asked him to stop but because Sona stopped Rohit by cautioning him to talk later.

in Sona’s defense, she did try to tell Rohit about the blackmailer, he was too lost in his nervousness about the surgery and instead of adding to his worries, Sona decided to handle it herself. Things have been unraveling too fast, she hasn’t had time to digest about Ajit’s gambling habit to tell Rohit about it. She forgave Rohit in the blink of an eye, no questions asked when she found out the truth about Rani. She stood staunchly by his side at the hospital when Rani tried to instigate her. Sona is a nice person, too much in love and a tad bit too idealistic, therein don’t lie her flaws. Her flaw is her compulsion to please Veena and be a perfect bahu which leads her to interfere in situations she should stay far away from. Rohit is not wrong in his POV either just a bit too impulsive with his words.

The only person I felt was not justified in her actioins was Veena. Don’t get me wrong, Veena is sweet and kind and is the glue that binds the Sippy family. But her rushing to berate Pari, slapping her twice and accusing Pari of being unable to contain her raging hormones and being a cheap gold digger was not warranted as Veena had not yet accosted her own creep of a son and had not chastised him for his grave sin. Her son had strayed in spite of being married after knowing he was to soon become a dad. The guy is shameless, tells Pari he doesn’t care, he still loves her and won’t let her go, he tells Rohit not to question him. Rohan is cheap, he plots and snares young vulnerable girls - his friend had warned him, Tanya had questioned him, he himself had seen the tracker but he shamelessly carries on. With such a son, Veena was wrong in assuming butter will not melt in Rohan’s mouth ‘cos of her faultless parvarish.

I still hold by what I had written yesterday, glad the Sippy’s’ truth was brought to light. I saw no one standing up for Sona when that friend of Naren’s was talking crap about Sona’s character. She had to defend herself, Veena did not open her mouth.

Deepa gives me the creeps sometimes, she was seen to be envious of the love and attention Sona was getting from Veena. She has slapped Pari too. Deepa could have disclosed the truth to the family and nipped the affair in the bud, she didn’t, instead she plots alongside of Tanya to do a public expose of Pari. The Sippys are so protective of Puja and even pay a woman to come act as her mother but they care two hoots about Pari’s reputation, airing the video in front of their friends at the party would have further ruined Pari’s (maybe nonexistent?) reputation.

I would say the Sippys got what was coming to them. Truth will out somehow and it did.

This is beautiful! Especially the bit about Deepa, It's so valid! I hadn't even thought of her that way until now.😲

Veena is definitely a pendulum. I'm finding it hard to analyze what she is. That way it's easier with Suman, who was shown as a negative character from day one. She always gave Pari a clean chit and was after Sona for even the smallest of things.

I found it hard to believe that Veena didn't even react when Pari mentioned the girls Rohan had been with before her.

Even at the jewelry exhibition, No one but Rohit even approached Rohan. I know that the Sippys belong to a certain 'class', 'stature' etc butmeverything seemed so fake in yesterday's episode.

Next week, we're getting guns. What do you guys think it's about? Because I'd like to think KHKT has't dropped so low that they'll give us another suicide attempt when the last one is still fresh in our memory, but then again, There were a lot of things I thought KHKT wouldn't resort to, but they've done it anyway..😭

Originally posted by: YoursDearly

This is beautiful! Especially the bit about Deepa, It's so valid! I hadn't even thought of her that way until now.😲

Veena is definitely a pendulum. I'm finding it hard to analyze what she is. That way it's easier with Suman, who was shown as a negative character from day one. She always gave Pari a clean chit and was after Sona for even the smallest of things.

I found it hard to believe that Veena didn't even react when Pari mentioned the girls Rohan had been with before her.

Even at the jewelry exhibition, No one but Rohit even approached Rohan. I know that the Sippys belong to a certain 'class', 'stature' etc butmeverything seemed so fake in yesterday's episode.

Next week, we're getting guns. What do you guys think it's about? Because I'd like to think KHKT has't dropped so low that they'll give us another suicide attempt when the last one is still fresh in our memory, but then again, There were a lot of things I thought KHKT wouldn't resort to, but they've done it anyway..😭

No one will slap scum.rohan .every one will blame Sona and Rohit character will be butchered to make Sona the victim.

That's what CV will do

Originally posted by: soapwatcher1

Very well analyzed , Reshmi. I think everyone was justified to an extent in acting the way they did in the heat of the moment. Rohit’s frustration and blaming Sona was understandable, him keeping at it was irritating but Sona seemed to get it that Rohit was just venting unreasonably and in anger. He does gain some measure of control over himself and shuts up at the Rastogi house.

I totally agree that Pari was not after Rohan for his money, doesn’t make what she did less despicable but I don’t think she is a gold digger, she is hot headed, has a vengeful streak in her, is selfish to the core but money was not what she was after.

Also true that Suman’s character has been considerably softened from the initial portrayal of her. She chastises Pari more, is more caring of Sona, and has overall been made palatable for the audience.

Btw, Pari is the one who alludes to Rohan’s string of affairs prior to her. Tanya was going to expose Rohan and Pari publicly and that would not have been less of a tamasha. It just got averted by Tanya’s heartbreak at seeing that video so it would have been a Sippy that humiliated the Sippys by washing their dirty linen in public.

Suman, in her defense, was not specific with her taunts but the moment the great Naren Sippy called the guards to throw her out is when her vitriol came gushing out.

Rohit stopped questioning Rohan not because Rohan asked him to stop but because Sona stopped Rohit by cautioning him to talk later.

in Sona’s defense, she did try to tell Rohit about the blackmailer, he was too lost in his nervousness about the surgery and instead of adding to his worries, Sona decided to handle it herself. Things have been unraveling too fast, she hasn’t had time to digest about Ajit’s gambling habit to tell Rohit about it. She forgave Rohit in the blink of an eye, no questions asked when she found out the truth about Rani. She stood staunchly by his side at the hospital when Rani tried to instigate her. Sona is a nice person, too much in love and a tad bit too idealistic, therein don’t lie her flaws. Her flaw is her compulsion to please Veena and be a perfect bahu which leads her to interfere in situations she should stay far away from. Rohit is not wrong in his POV either just a bit too impulsive with his words.

The only person I felt was not justified in her actioins was Veena. Don’t get me wrong, Veena is sweet and kind and is the glue that binds the Sippy family. But her rushing to berate Pari, slapping her twice and accusing Pari of being unable to contain her raging hormones and being a cheap gold digger was not warranted as Veena had not yet accosted her own creep of a son and had not chastised him for his grave sin. Her son had strayed in spite of being married after knowing he was to soon become a dad. The guy is shameless, tells Pari he doesn’t care, he still loves her and won’t let her go, he tells Rohit not to question him. Rohan is cheap, he plots and snares young vulnerable girls - his friend had warned him, Tanya had questioned him, he himself had seen the tracker but he shamelessly carries on. With such a son, Veena was wrong in assuming butter will not melt in Rohan’s mouth ‘cos of her faultless parvarish.

I still hold by what I had written yesterday, glad the Sippy’s’ truth was brought to light. I saw no one standing up for Sona when that friend of Naren’s was talking crap about Sona’s character. She had to defend herself, Veena did not open her mouth.

Deepa gives me the creeps sometimes, she was seen to be envious of the love and attention Sona was getting from Veena. She has slapped Pari too. Deepa could have disclosed the truth to the family and nipped the affair in the bud, she didn’t, instead she plots alongside of Tanya to do a public expose of Pari. The Sippys are so protective of Puja and even pay a woman to come act as her mother but they care two hoots about Pari’s reputation, airing the video in front of their friends at the party would have further ruined Pari’s (maybe nonexistent?) reputation.

I would say the Sippys got what was coming to them. Truth will out somehow and it did.

Thank you for this post. Beautifully analyzed 👏. I agree with you regarding Sona, Pari, Rohan, Veena, Suman and even Deepa. Rohit also to an extent. I just don't agree with the fact that what Rohit said to Sona can just be excused because he was angry. He questioned his marriage to Sona and also blamed Sona and her family as if they were directly involved in the affair. I didn't hear anything from him about Rohan's fault when he was confronting Sona. That in my opinion was very wrong of him. I would have even been ok if he was mad for Pari being involved and was venting out, but he was saying "Sona and her family are to be blamed". That was wrong and uncalled for.

Originally posted by: LoveInAutumn26

Thank you for this post. Beautifully analyzed 👏. I agree with you regarding Sona, Pari, Rohan, Veena, Suman and even Deepa. Rohit also to an extent. I just don't agree with the fact that what Rohit said to Sona can just be excused because he was angry. He questioned his marriage to Sona and also blamed Sona and her family as if they were directly involved in the affair. I didn't hear anything from him about Rohan's fault when he was confronting Sona. That in my opinion was very wrong of him. I would have even been ok if he was mad for Pari being involved and was venting out, but he was saying "Sona and her family are to be blamed". That was wrong and uncalled for.

Exactly! The Rohit Sippy that the show has built over the last few months would never, under no circumstances say something like this. That's what makes the entire situation worse. Suddenly, the writers have turned him into what he's not. I really don't get it.. Why did they do so? It's not like we would have missed any of the things he said.. Rather we'd be much happier without those dialogues.

Originally posted by: soapwatcher1

Very well analyzed , Reshmi. I think everyone was justified to an extent in acting the way they did in the heat of the moment. Rohit’s frustration and blaming Sona was understandable, him keeping at it was irritating but Sona seemed to get it that Rohit was just venting unreasonably and in anger. He does gain some measure of control over himself and shuts up at the Rastogi house.

I totally agree that Pari was not after Rohan for his money, doesn’t make what she did less despicable but I don’t think she is a gold digger, she is hot headed, has a vengeful streak in her, is selfish to the core but money was not what she was after.

Also true that Suman’s character has been considerably softened from the initial portrayal of her. She chastises Pari more, is more caring of Sona, and has overall been made palatable for the audience.

Btw, Pari is the one who alludes to Rohan’s string of affairs prior to her. Tanya was going to expose Rohan and Pari publicly and that would not have been less of a tamasha. It just got averted by Tanya’s heartbreak at seeing that video so it would have been a Sippy that humiliated the Sippys by washing their dirty linen in public.

Suman, in her defense, was not specific with her the great Naren Sippy called the guards to throw her out is when her vitriol came gushing out.

Rohit stopped questioning Rohan not because Rohan asked him to stop but because Sona stopped Rohit by cautioning him to talk later.

in Sona’s defense, she did try to tell Rohit about the blackmailer, he was too lost in his nervousness about the surgery and instead of adding to his worries, Sona decided to handle it herself. Things have been unraveling too fast, she hasn’t had time to digest about Ajit’s gambling habit to tell Rohit about it. She forgave Rohit in the blink of an eye, no questions asked when she found out the truth about Rani. She stood staunchly by his side at the hospital when Rani tried to instigate her. Sona is a nice person, too much in love and a tad bit too idealistic, therein don’t lie her flaws. Her flaw is her compulsion to please Veena and be a perfect bahu which leads her to interfere in situations she should stay far away from. Rohit is not wrong in his POV either just a bit too impulsive with his words.

The only person I felt was not justified in her actioins was Veena. Don’t get me wrong, Veena is sweet and kind and is the glue that binds the Sippy family. But her rushing to berate Pari, slapping her twice and accusing Pari of being unable to contain her raging hormones and being a cheap gold digger was not warranted as Veena had not yet accosted her own creep of a son and had not chastised him for his grave sin. Her son had strayed in spite of being married after knowing he was to soon become a dad. The guy is shameless, tells Pari he doesn’t care, he still loves her and won’t let her go, he tells Rohit not to question him. Rohan is cheap, he plots and snares young vulnerable girls - his friend had warned him, Tanya had questioned him, he himself had seen the tracker but he shamelessly carries on. With such a son, Veena was wrong in assuming butter will not melt in Rohan’s mouth ‘cos of her faultless parvarish.

I still hold by what I had written yesterday, glad the Sippy’s’ truth was brought to light. I saw no one standing up for Sona when that friend of Naren’s was talking crap about Sona’s character. She had to defend herself, Veena did not open her mouth.

Deepa gives me the creeps sometimes, she was seen to be envious of the love and attention Sona was getting from Veena. She has slapped Pari too. Deepa could have disclosed the truth to the family and nipped the affair in the bud, she didn’t, instead she plots alongside of Tanya to do a public expose of Pari. The Sippys are so protective of Puja and even pay a woman to come act as her mother but they care two hoots about Pari’s reputation, airing the video in front of their friends at the party would have further ruined Pari’s (maybe nonexistent?) reputation.

I would say the Sippys got what was coming to them. Truth will out somehow and it did.

Yes you are right...Suman got more angry when Naren intervened ...as he himself is characterless but bears a mask as most high society ppl do...they have all issues and no one in their families is really good but still they are ready to pounce on middle class families questioning upbringing .....

Also right abt Veena ...better to be what you show to the world then be sweet and behave bad ..she has simply no courage to support or defend Sona but she expects her to sacrifice everything ...she looks seeet but when she speaks she is cruel ...

Sonakshi agree that she is trying to save her marriage and support both families so is in a fix sometimes but the common problem with serials is they show too much good or too much bad.:.which is irritating ...why she could not have told Rohit abt Ajit ...and it is not abt delay ...she does not have any intention as to wo Devi hain ...or even the too much sacrifice shown ...understand that a lady would look at the best option and not want to hurt anyone ...but not always will she keep quiet ...and she should be able to stand by the right ...here Sonakshi blindly does things for her husband’s family ....whether Veena or this Ajit thing or anything else ...

Originally posted by: Reshmi.parekh78

Yes you are right...Suman got more angry when Naren intervened ...as he himself is characterless but bears a mask as most high society ppl do...they have all issues and no one in their families is really good but still they are ready to pounce on middle class families questioning upbringing .....

Also right abt Veena ...better to be what you show to the world then be sweet and behave bad ..she has simply no courage to support or defend Sona but she expects her to sacrifice everything ...she looks seeet but when she speaks she is cruel ...

Sonakshi agree that she is trying to save her marriage and support both families so is in a fix sometimes but the common problem with serials is they show too much good or too much bad.:.which is irritating ...why she could not have told Rohit abt Ajit ...and it is not abt delay ...she does not have any intention as to wo Devi hain ...or even the too much sacrifice shown ...understand that a lady would look at the best option and not want to hurt anyone ...but not always will she keep quiet ...and she should be able to stand by the right ...here Sonakshi blindly does things for her husband’s family ....whether Veena or this Ajit thing or anything else ...

That's the prob of some itv soaps.they r hell bent on showing FL as mahaan like sona

That will make us disassociate from character