Birbal's entry....time to rejoice....:) -DT NT Pg 7 - Page 6

Originally posted by: Sandhya.A

I can only see one reason for rushing in of Salim

The inability of BT to project the Chittore war from Akbar's pov. Fear of attack from Senas.🤔

When the enemity is projected from MP's pov, it is absolutely jaayaz to show Akbar like a monster. But from Akbar's pov, to praise his emphatic win is blasphemous perhaps according to the ph and trp janta as well. Also they can't give Jodha begum credits for the win.😡

Originally posted by: adianasr

Khushi let us hope Birbal does not become a Tansen part 2 or a TM part 2 - also Birbal entry ka matlab H and H ki kahani khatam and that means soon the story will be fastforwarded to 1569 and Salim's birth - Khushi I still state that November will see the end of season 1 at the year 1574 with Sikri declared as the new capital - and 6 months later shd see season 2 with a grown up Salim in the year 1591 - that is if there is a season 2 which I doubt!!!

Kindly refrain from posting and discussing history else post will have to b closed and if its the same person making the error repeatedly then Stricter action will b taken against them

JA DT

Originally posted by: Sandhya.A

I can only see one reason for rushing in of Salim

The inability of BT to project the Chittore war from Akbar's pov. Fear of attack from Senas.🤔

When the enemity is projected from MP's pov, it is absolutely jaayaz to show Akbar like a monster. But from Akbar's pov, to praise his emphatic win is blasphemous perhaps according to the ph and trp janta as well. Also they can't give Jodha begum credits for the win.😡

Originally posted by: -RD-

Kindly refrain from posting and discussing history else post will have to b closed and if its the same person making the error repeatedly then Stricter action will b taken against them

JA DT

Originally posted by: Donjas

Sorry to be blunt but this argument is ridiculous to me. Ekta is not following history, she is being inspired by it(I am in a generous mood today). She will include whatever historical events she wants to show, exclude whatever events she does not want to show and invent incidents that have no bearing with history.

Ekta, can do all this and no one in his right mind is going to protest. If someone asks why didn't you show brutal side of Akbar at Chittor. Ekta's answer will be, I have already shown the savage side of his personality in the beginning of the serial. If Ekta wants, she does not need to show a single battle in Akbar's active career and there will not be a peep from anybody. Of course that will lower the quality of the show, so a fine balance between the two is needed.

I have not seen a single historical serial which slavishly follows facts from history. Our serial still has some resemblance to history, in another serial running on SONY at the moment, Akbar has already been defeated numerous times.

There may be leap or not, but not for the Chittor case.

Don't remind me of that show that I used to see the closing moments of, when I used to watch Yudh. It is blasphemous and too staged...even the last few minutes were a torture. But if it is shown and even if Akbar's brutality is toned down, MP has to be discussed in unfavourable terms by the Mughals which is a risk that EK would not want to take. It is an open secret that her Jai Jodha Sangraam itself is a result of her obsession with heroine mahaanta and the wish to please Senas.(That is why we have the R word used profusely in a celebrated way)

Originally posted by: adianasr

Btw Sands did u read the pm that I had sent with a link to the chittore war interpretation of Muni Lal???

Originally posted by: Sandhya.A

Don't remind me of that show that I used to see the closing moments of, when I used to watch Yudh. It is blasphemous and too staged...even the last few minutes were a torture.

Here what I meant is that if there is no leap, Ekta cannot ignore Chittore. It is too big an incident in Akbar's life to be ignored.It would be like omitting Birbal.

But if it is shown and even if Akbar's brutality is toned down, MP has to be discussed in unfavourable terms by the Mughals which is a risk that EK would not want to take. It is an open secret that her Jai Jodha Sangraam itself is a result of her obsession with heroine mahaanta and the wish to please Senas.(That is why we have the R word used profusely in a celebrated way)

Ok will pm again and do chk the pm I sent today some half hour back

Originally posted by: Sandhya.A

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif">🤔...no.😕</font>

Originally posted by: Donjas

I think you are giving too much importance to this incident. In which history book about Akbar is this incident discussed. Most people don't even know about it. In most histories, this incident is barely mentioned and if it is, it is part of the account of a long series of battles, in which the incident itself is lost in the details.

I myself has no idea of the Chittor incident before the movie Jodha Akbar and what I learned, I did not learn from any historical records about Akbar, but from the rantings of fundamentalists protesting about the movie. Even there, it was a non issue, only the name Jodha mattered to the protesters.

Ekta can easily exclude it.

Ok guys...so how will Birbal's entry be in the show???