Jodha Akbar 212: Manna from Heaven or a mrigtrishna ? - Page 6

Originally posted by: munnirony

draupadi's anger & dialogues was totally justified, bcoz whtever maybe the issue the reality is her husbands r totally at fault. but jalal's anger was justified. & its not true tht jalal didnt trusted her. infact, jalal trusted her despite he saw her going into the hut. now if jodha's doesnt tell him the truth, wht will he do??? she also misunderstood him many time regarding SKLL. did she said or felt srry???? & one more thing im sure if TE was in pandav's place duryodhan would have been dead then & there.

Originally posted by: aashyagh

I m waiting for the day Jalal gets to know Shariffuddin's lust for her, he will be in rage.

Shyamala, a small write up about today's episode. Letter reading, Jalal's feelings and the last scene where our Jodha defends Jalal. She can only defend him in his absence, never supports him in his presence.

Originally posted by: Mallika-E-Bhais

@Shre: Yes, she looked SO pretty! 😳 and very cute!

I loved the way she looked aorund her room, as if acknowledging that this room, this fort is her Home & thinking how much she'll miss it. 😳

But her dramatic pronouncement that Jalal should've looked into her eyes & would've known the Truth?

Mughaliya Harriya-E-Potteriya, people? 😆

Originally posted by: munnirony

i liked jodha defending jalal. it was really cute. but tht scene also gave us the hint tht pilgrim tax will also be removed by jodha. again jalal wont get any credit.😕

Originally posted by: Sandhya.A

Aunty,

I thought that the wordings of the letter were a let down. The SW who wrote for angry Jalal on Friday did his homework well and covered all the points. But today the letter which is supposed to be a very important part of the story was a let down

The part saying, had I loved another man... I would have done jauhar part was fine.

But couldn't it have been ...though I grina-ed you initially later as I told you it changed. Prem ka kamal or whatever had begun to bloom and you crushed it with your anger. What else but love would prompt a person to drink poison for another. But you mocked even that. In what action of mine thus far did you see me capable of zinakari. You had once accused me of adultery earlier, that you yourself proved wrong. But at that time you trusted me. But now you declare to have fallen in love with me. Why not the similar trust? My silence I agree was hurting you. But I wish you had trusted me a little more. Given me a little more time to prove myself . Has our relationship that has progressed from distinct hatred for each other to love, seen extremes and withstood thunderstorms capable of that. I agree, you were not at fault either...the circumstances forced you to think otherwise...but was adultery the only explanation you could come up with. I am not blaming you but perhaps bhagya is not my friend.

I felt angry and fought against your earlier accusation of adultery. But this time I feel hurt and broken and cannot bear it as I have fallen in love with you. I cannot take it again and again and hence I leave.

Then...the don't send sena part... and wherever I am my prayers are there for you.

The vachan and hriday part of the letter sounded totally irrelevant and in fact strangely funny. The letter itself in most parts was incoherent and contradictory.