As for Jodha's defence counsel's arguments, they were necessary to buttress the main assertion, by asserting his bonafides in the matter. She would have done the same if it had been anyone else, for this is a question of fairness and a matter of the facts.
As for the only change, that she does not now attribute ulterior motives to him, as she did during their first post-Mohan squabble, I have covered that in my post.
It is very nice to have you back.
Shyamala Aunty
Originally posted by: Super Kool
Nice post aunty...👍🏼
I would just like to make one point...I absolutely agree when you say her sense of right and wrong is very strong...it is reflected when she said how can they ask for something which doesn't belong to amer?...but...her defence of jalal became a bit personal when she emphasised that jalal has taken pains to arrange this marriage, he held on to his temper, it's he who is being cheated...yes, she knows jalal is a man of his words...who will know it better than her? She always refused to acknowledge it even to herself (except once)...it is this acknowledgement( nothing more nothing less) that caught my attention...VoiceOver for jodha- bingo!!! Cvs want to keep their option openToday's epi- if jodha gonna blurt out everything to jalal without any proofs I am gonna jump from my room's window (it stay at groundfloor)...
366