story isnt correct man

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

soulstarspirit

@soulstarspirit

Dazzler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#11

i agree.they are potraying akbar as cruel n heartless emperor which was not the case.
Akbar was quite generous towards his people.He was dominating,angry young man types and egoistic(which all the kings n emperors used to be during those times) but he never did wrong with his people.
Akbar did change post his marriage with Jodha but this doesnt mean that he was a cruel villain before that.
I would say CVs have just over dramatized Akbar's character.They need to tone down a bit

Edited by sur. - 12 years ago

Quote

libran90

@libran90

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 12 years ago

#12

I feel that Ekta Kapoor is trying to explore the relationship of Bairam Khan and Akbar...because there is not much description given as to how Bairam Khan influenced Akbar's life...and ofcourse spicing it up more than normal...

Even in the movie we did not see much of Bairam Khan and Akbar...but this is fiction...here more is better...Akbar won't get married to Jodha so soon...the show has just begun...there's a lot to go...

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

_innocent_

@_innocent_

Achiever

+ 4

Posted: 12 years ago

#13

The history writers themselves wrote from their own perspective of the history itself, and the amount of obscurity in this story always favour the directors as they can twist and play it the way they want! No-one has the true accounts of what had truly occured! We also know Akbar had 3 wives (from historical perspective, but cvs wont indulge on that, and we also have no definite proof that Jodha Bai even existed name wise, or whether or not she was his love/wife, or grand-daughter! And as the person above stated, bear a thought to the disclaimer😃

PS! Because of no definite proof, its literally dependable on the writers' own perspective in those loop holes, hence no-one will agree with it because obvz everyone's has a different POV! Hence try and not get too into it being extremely accurate and citing it as a legitimate source😆😆😆 as even historians from those eras disagreed😆😆😆

Edited by _innocent_ - 12 years ago

Quote

1 2

story isnt correct man - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics