Bribed judges gave Sid more marks than Mukti!!! - Page 4

@Damoncrazy You surely dont mean by doing music videos one can become a celeb...

Originally posted by: DiehardYMfan

@Damoncrazy You surely dont mean by doing music videos one can become a celeb...

and also being a contestant on ZND does not make her a celeb automatically..she was just a contestant!!

Its not everything just onscreen which makes one a celeb. Mukti has also participated in certain prestigious competitions, & is making a name for herself if you go a more into the dance side of the industry. She's not Shakti Mohan, but sh has her own name in that sector. And since JDJ is a DANCE SHOW (though practically it hardly is one), I thibk it makes perfect sense for her to be here.

Originally posted by: TheRowdiest

If a non-Celeb Mukti can be in the show as a celeb along with celebs like Sid, shaan , Drashti etc ... even salman , punit r bigger celebs than her then why not Sid can score same marks as her ??? and Sid is not a trained dancer by "Terence " 😉 ... he got what he deserved for his own performance

Agree with you .. well I also noticed that about two lifts they lose balance .. but compared to sid and mohena .. Muktis dance was far better .. at least they should have given same marks ...

Originally posted by: DiehardYMfan

@Damoncrazy You surely dont mean by doing music videos one can become a celeb...

and also being a contestant on ZND does not make her a celeb automatically..she was just a contestant!!

Originally posted by: HashiBoo

Agree with you .. well I also noticed that about two lifts they lose balance .. but compared to sid and mohena .. Muktis dance was far better .. at least they should have given same marks ...

This year judges are unbareble ..

Originally posted by: dazzlingflora

agree as far i know about rumba. it has less dance for boys and more of expression.

Originally posted by: lostinsideurluv

But there's difference between samba and rumba so the execution is different,so just cos of lifts the marks are not deducted its the whole act per se which could have been better..😊

Originally posted by: HashiBoo

Oh ..I actually didnt watch judges comments and marks .. well i am not aware of sumba and Rubma thing .. as performances I saw Muktis one was better .. Thanks for the information ..

Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan

One thing I have learned about Jhalak,

Is not to compare marks between contestants.

Because everyone has their own graph, and own journey. I know its stupid and it should not be like this.

But I feel that they give marks according to that person progress and past performances. We all Siddharth is a horrible dancer so him getting a 9 is different than Mukti getting a 8 or 7 or whatever.

Mukti is under-performing, she was a lot better in ZND, shes not doing as good as she can. So in that way, the marks I would say are fair.

Its just like the kids, they are CLEARLY the best dancers there, but they always a get a 9. They get a 9 bcuz the judges KNOW they can do better, now if Siddharth gets a 9, it doesn't mean he is better than them.

hope it makes sense, but that's what I think is happening here.