Bribed judges gave Sid more marks than Mukti!!! - Page 3

Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan

One thing I have learned about Jhalak,

Is not to compare marks between contestants.

Because everyone has their own graph, and own journey. I know its stupid and it should not be like this.

But I feel that they give marks according to that person progress and past performances. We all Siddharth is a horrible dancer so him getting a 9 is different than Mukti getting a 8 or 7 or whatever.

Mukti is under-performing, she was a lot better in ZND, shes not doing as good as she can. So in that way, the marks I would say are fair.

Its just like the kids, they are CLEARLY the best dancers there, but they always a get a 9. They get a 9 bcuz the judges KNOW they can do better, now if Siddharth gets a 9, it doesn't mean he is better than them.

hope it makes sense, but that's what I think is happening here.

Originally posted by: lostinsideurluv

First of there's difference between samba and rumba..accordingly,what mukti did was mediocre..wish there was more power..choreo could have been definitely better but loved her expressions whereas rumba for sid was really darn good..he brought in the right emotion,body language(except in one place) n right timing..

second of there should be some kinda improvement which was pretty evident in sid's performance..

this is just my pov..😳