Poor judging last week.......... - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

13

Views

1.7k

Users

12

Likes

23

Frequent Posters

vickosh thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#11

I personally think that the audience has the right to judge a contestant on whatever basis they feel right. They could vote based on the appearance, gender, personal taste....whatever it is, it is OK. But the judges need to give the correct score to every contestant. They have to put aside any personal perferences and base their scores on pure dancing alone. They should not feel bad to give score of 4 or 5 to contestants that are weak. This way two things are accomplished.

One is the contestant knows that they need to work hard and to work on things that they are weak at. For example if Ragini or Mahi is told that she has a particular flaw when needs to improve then know that they have to improve on it. Just saying that you were very good or fantastic when they were not is not helping them.
The second point is that if the judges score are correct, they will be able to compensate for the voting by the audience which is purely based on personal liking rather than good dancing. This will help people like Yana or the other model who got eliminated in the first round.
Judges should encourage the contestants for sure. So if Ragini and Mahi started getting score of 3, 4 or 5 in the beginning and then improved to 4, 5, 6 and then to 5, 6, 7 that would be understandable. Giving them scores of 8 or 9 or 10 when they are clearly not at that point must be very frustrating to other contestants when they are far better but receive score of 7.
Anyways, looks like I have ruffled a lot of feathers with my comment/observations about Mahi and Ragini,.......................
infinity00 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: vickosh

I personally think that the audience has the right to judge a contestant on whatever basis they feel right. They could vote based on the appearance, gender, personal taste....whatever it is, it is OK. But the judges need to give the correct score to every contestant. They have to put aside any personal perferences and base their scores on pure dancing alone. They should not feel bad to give score of 4 or 5 to contestants that are weak. This way two things are accomplished.

One is the contestant knows that they need to work hard and to work on things that they are weak at. For example if Ragini or Mahi is told that she has a particular flaw when needs to improve then know that they have to improve on it. Just saying that you were very good or fantastic when they were not is not helping them.
The second point is that if the judges score are correct, they will be able to compensate for the voting by the audience which is purely based on personal liking rather than good dancing. This will help people like Yana or the other model who got eliminated in the first round.
Judges should encourage the contestants for sure. So if Ragini and Mahi started getting score of 3, 4 or 5 in the beginning and then improved to 4, 5, 6 and then to 5, 6, 7 that would be understandable. Giving them scores of 8 or 9 or 10 when they are clearly not at that point must be very frustrating to other contestants when they are far better but receive score of 7.
Anyways, looks like I have ruffled a lot of feathers with my comment/observations about Mahi and Ragini,.......................

Its more fun this way!!!😉😉 No I understand what you are saying, but judges judgments in voting contest doesnt matter that much as fans would vote there favourites no matter how bad they would perform. Coming to Ragini,s points, mostly she got, 6s and 7s. only once she got 30, and once 26, but she had, 19, then 21 and 20 as well, she will be out one day if she doesnt do better and I will not be surprised but if meantime she can perform well hopefully she will prove the critics wrong, hopefully but if not , the exit door is clearly marked. But at the same time fans of Sushant or Yana can not just claim that they are the only best contestant there, there is a room for everybody to perform , not every performer is professionaly trained , they all have fair chance of improving and the audiance should appreciate it.
debayon thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#13
No offense to anybody, but I have always been irked by this season's judges.

Remo mostly rests his points on the choreography for some reason, and gives out 2-3 comments about the participants, and then keeps going on about how the choreography was. Only last time was he really talking about the dancing aspect of it, but then he got really technical about it.....as if the contestants were from DID, and not JDJ. Perhaps he is still getting the hang of this show, or just has sort of an identity crisis. Anyways...

I was so excited when I heard that none other than Madhuri Dixit has been asked to judge the show...I was looking forward to it, but to my surprise, she has kinda disappointed me. She is indeed very witty and bubbly, her presence is quite vivacious and all, but honestly don't see any connection between her comments and her scoring.

Malaika...hmmm she has actually been very critical(in a positive way) about the dancing...she is kinda like the Saroj Khan of this season....she might be harsh sometimes, but her points are valid....but of late, I have seen her going off-course.....

I wish we could have Vaishnavi Merchant, Shaimak etc back....
--Rachna-- thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 14 years ago
#14
^^ Shiamak Davar was the best judge! 😃 I liked Vaibhavi too 😛 You spelled her name wrong 😆

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".