3rd partner

Unfair advantage to Sushant since Rashmi Desai is a terrific dancer
Akhil is already weak and struggling and he gets Sonali who's more famous for her comic timing.

she was good on znd but not always top scorer

even I feel the same........clearly few jodis will get undue advantages over others......... this is totally unfair.

its unfair yes .... sushant and shampa should have gotten a weak dancer and akhil for example a strong dancer .... just to equalize it

I don't know if it is an advantage or not- there are different ways to see it.

1.) Judges tend to like cute kiddie acts. Plus I expect they will go lenient on the kids.
2.) Sarita Joshi is elder than everyone. She will always get the age factor advantage. Not blaming the judges here- even I would whistle at her if she shakes a leg to some nice rocking no.

At the end of the day, its the concept that holds a lot of importance. A cleverly chosen concept and clever choreography can work wonders. those who have got kids, can do a number of cute acts which will make the judges go awww..... So who's getting the advantage now? :-)

As I said above, it's just the lens by which we see things. Rather than analyse what others got, its always better to think about the positives of what you have got, is what I believe.

whaat are u guys talking about?

Originally posted by: ekta_salman

its unfair yes .... sushant and shampa should have gotten a weak dancer and akhil for example a strong dancer .... just to equalize it

lol salman got two hot girls over there ahahha tht made me laugh :P i hope she can dance :)

But at the end of the day, the contestants are gonna be evaluated, not the celebrity guests.😊

I have seen that when you pair up one very good dancer with a bad one, then the discrepancies of the weak dancer is noticed more. Just my opinion.

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

But at the end of the day, the contestants are gonna be evaluated, not the celebrity guests.😊

I have seen that when you pair up one very good dancer with a bad one, then the discrepancies of the weak dancer is noticed more. Just my opinion.

yeh but imagine if akhil got a good dancer ... then the act would have looked much better overall ... but if he gets weak dancer its gonna spoil it ... so in the end the guests are gonna affect the contestants marks i think

Originally posted by: ekta_salman

yeh but imagine if akhil got a good dancer ... then the act would have looked much better overall ... but if he gets weak dancer its gonna spoil it ... so in the end the guests are gonna affect the contestants marks i think

I do agree. I just wanted to point that just getting a good dancer does not mean all will be hunky dory.

Personally I think it is the concept which is going to influence everything else- three people on stage with equal emphasis on each is a difficult task. Those who have kids can do some cute 'family' dance, and I think I'm going to enjoy it a lot and cheer for the kids. Imagine Sarita Joshi doing Munni badnaam hui, won't it be fun??? I'm sure judges will give standing ovation. Rashmi Desai will be pani kam chai in front of her then.

Its like, you can see the glass both ways- half empty or half full. that is why I said choreographers should capitalise on what they've got.

Plus why is everyone picking out only on Sushant? Even Neha Marda and Jay Soni are very good dancers.