Originally posted by: Filza.
In my opinion R's children did disrespect her numoerous times before N came into their lives.
Having wishes is not wrong but Nishi and Aarav failed to understand their mother even before N made an entry and labelled her a dictator and rigid when their demands were not met and wishes not fulfilled. You say they understood their mother,valued her and thought highly of her. Right. That is the reason they said they feel suffocated and out of frustration googled their father and wished for him to get back into their lives. Had they really valued their mother and considered her enough for them they would never wish for N to come back to their lives.
I'm not going into why Nishi called her father but the fact is she called her father behind her mother's back, lied to her, went to see him when she very well knew her mother will not like this. This is the biggest ever disrespect for her mother from Nishi. What she did was a direct insult to all what R has done for the two of them in15 years all alone as a single parent. By asking for help from N she put her mother down in front of the whole world.
She wanted to invite N for her wedding against her mother's wishes and how rudely she had announced that to R. How was that respect for their mother.
And Aarav was not forced to do business by N. There is a big difference between force and support. N only allowed him and supported him on certain conditions.
And Ragini never called Aarav in those 9 months, never went to see him and its only now since the past few days that she is shown missing him. How and why should i assume R mourned for Aarav for 9 months and was in an internal conflict when nothing of that sort was even mentioned or shown and when she decided to get engaged when her son was rotting in prison. Her way of mournng i suppose.
lastly whatever you think of N and your view that he deserves anger and bashing is your opinion and i dont necessarily have to agree.
Also i dont view him as a complete or even somewhat evil.
This was the reason I am trying to explain and wrote in my post.
You don't have to agree with anything that I say, you are entitled to your opinion.
Now how I know Ragini mourned because she said in her conversations that she did.
As for the children, yes they had tiffs with their mother but they still understood her. That is concluded from the flashbacks and thinking again on their decisions that upsets their mother prior the leap.
And this is what I argued my whole post, why Nishi googled their father, I gave the reason. It was because of desperation and not having their demands met. children have this type of thing with every parents, it is the parent's responsibility whether they understand or not. It was frustration but that frustration wouldn't have turned into taking sides if neil had not supported them. After Neil entered their lives, they became unable to understand their mom at all. Listen you can disagree yet I still believe that Neil is accountable to the disrespect they show toward's ragini and the broken connection.
You say there was no connection but remember when it was revealed that Ragini saved Ranbir, Nishi apologized to her mom. When Aarav insulted ragini at his birthday part and when ragini returned upset, he came home and tried console her, saying she must not have eaten because she never eats when they have a fight and fed her.
They had bonds with their mother and like every child they had differences with their mom but that one argument and desperation when they decided to contact their dad does not speak for their entire life. They knew their mom was rigid but they knew when they were wrong too. Its just a strongly shown that when Neil came, their views for their mom altered greatly due to the support they were receiving (nishi) and overall wealth (Aarav).
They were influenced by their Dad.
Again I stated this that Neil is not evil but today he has to be held accountable for his mistakes. Do not take me the wrong way that I am bashing Neil solely, no one is evil in the show, everyone has motives and especially the leads, I already mentioned they all made faults but today's portrayal of neil is why I made these statements.
Again you do not have to agree with it and yes we can argue but the concept will remain debatable