Posted:
Posted: 01 June 2015 at 1:18pm | IP Logged
Report Quote
I would like to add a few of my thoughts
Neil and Ragini divided the kids. I do no know what criteria they used to divide the kids.
But it seems pretty unfair on the kids because they got divided like inanimate objects.
It is not right. I mean court orders one parent to have custody and the other to have visiting rights. And the richer parent contributes . Kind of all kids are treated equally in such cases.
Now why Aarav and Nishi were "chosen" to go with Ragini I do not know.
Ragini is only one fiftieth times rich as Neil seems to be.
Neil is fifty times richer than Ragini.
While it is Ragini's decision to live with her resources it is unfair on Aarav and Nishi to be with Ragini like they "belong" to her and do what she wishes them to do.
And for Ranbir and Agam to be so much richer than these two kids forced to be middle class "thanks" to Ragini.
No wonder they are angry with Ragini.
Ragini is angry with Neil feels cheated has no wish to live off his wealth. But why should the kids suffer because of Ragini's personal feelings?
For Nishi and Aarav Neil is their father. They have a right to get angry with Neil if he cheated their mom but no more than Agam and Ranbir who were made to live with Neil .
Whoever divided the kids did wrong be it Ragini or Neil. Ragini has no right to forcer her feelings on the kids Nishi and Aarav.
And cheat Ranbir and Agam of their motherly love.
No wonder Nishi and Aarav blame Ragini.
Anupamaa
Real Estate
